similar to: Is there any problem that can arise from remapping gidNumber?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Is there any problem that can arise from remapping gidNumber?"

2015 Jan 13
2
Is there any problem that can arise from remapping gidNumber?
On 01/13/2015 06:35 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 13/01/15 11:33, John Lewis wrote: >> This morning I remapped gidNumber from primaryGroupID to gidNumber. I >> did that because I could not change the integer in primaryGroupID wit >> ldbedt as root. >> >> I mapped to to a new attribute called gidNumber which has no specific >> meaning in samba. Is there any
2015 Jan 13
2
Is there any problem that can arise from remapping gidNumber?
On 01/13/2015 09:23 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 13/01/15 14:06, John Lewis wrote: >> On 01/13/2015 06:35 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 13/01/15 11:33, John Lewis wrote: >>>> This morning I remapped gidNumber from primaryGroupID to gidNumber. I >>>> did that because I could not change the integer in primaryGroupID wit >>>> ldbedt as root.
2015 Jan 13
2
Is there any problem that can arise from remapping gidNumber?
On 01/13/2015 10:41 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 13/01/15 15:11, John Lewis wrote: >> On 01/13/2015 09:23 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 13/01/15 14:06, John Lewis wrote: >>>> On 01/13/2015 06:35 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>>> On 13/01/15 11:33, John Lewis wrote: >>>>>> This morning I remapped gidNumber from primaryGroupID to
2015 Jan 13
2
Is there any problem that can arise from remapping gidNumber?
On 13/01/15 16:25, John Lewis wrote: > On 01/13/2015 11:10 AM, John Lewis wrote: >> On 01/13/2015 10:41 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 13/01/15 15:11, John Lewis wrote: >>>> On 01/13/2015 09:23 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>>> On 13/01/15 14:06, John Lewis wrote: >>>>>> On 01/13/2015 06:35 AM, Rowland Penny wrote:
2015 Jan 13
0
Is there any problem that can arise from remapping gidNumber?
On 13/01/15 15:11, John Lewis wrote: > On 01/13/2015 09:23 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 13/01/15 14:06, John Lewis wrote: >>> On 01/13/2015 06:35 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>> On 13/01/15 11:33, John Lewis wrote: >>>>> This morning I remapped gidNumber from primaryGroupID to gidNumber. I >>>>> did that because I could not change the
2015 Jan 13
0
Is there any problem that can arise from remapping gidNumber?
On 01/13/2015 11:10 AM, John Lewis wrote: > On 01/13/2015 10:41 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 13/01/15 15:11, John Lewis wrote: >>> On 01/13/2015 09:23 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>> On 13/01/15 14:06, John Lewis wrote: >>>>> On 01/13/2015 06:35 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>>>> On 13/01/15 11:33, John Lewis wrote:
2015 Jan 13
1
Is there any problem that can arise from remapping gidNumber?
On 13/01/15 17:22, John Lewis wrote: > On 01/13/2015 12:03 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 13/01/15 16:25, John Lewis wrote: >>> On 01/13/2015 11:10 AM, John Lewis wrote: >>> I figured out that the RID was the last few numbers on the end of the >>> objectSid. >>> >>> How do I change the object Rid so I can change the GID of the group? >>
2019 Aug 19
4
winbind on DC : how use gidNumber instead of primaryGroupID as user's primary group
Hi Samba Team ! My Samba AD DC server run an NFSv4 server so I need correct RFC2307 id mapping between the server and the clients. On the client side it's very easy with the new smb.conf options : idmap config SAMDOM:unix_nss_info = yes idmap config SAMDOM:unix_primary_group = yes But on the server side winbind use the gidNumber of the group corresponding to the user's primaryGroupID.
2019 Aug 19
3
winbind on DC : how use gidNumber instead of primaryGroupID as user's primary group
Le lun. 19 ao?t 2019 ? 11:01, L.P.H. van Belle via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > > Hai, > > Fist of all, i must say it not very wise to have you NFS server on the AD-DC. > > I do about the same but my NFS server is on a member. > > Have you configured /etc/nsswitch.conf ? > If not do that. > > If you run : id username > I see :
2019 Nov 09
2
Samba 4.9 + winbind and 'domain users' gidNumber=513 problem
Hi I apologize for long introduction, but I hope it can clarify the problem. We use Samba in the following configuration: 1. Samba DC based on Samba4 2. Windows Member Server 2008/2012 where we manage users (windows admin tools have Unix Attributes) and where some users work with Win Programs 3. Multiple Samba4 Member Servers for Shares 4. Multiple Windows/Linux Workstations that use Samba AD for
2019 Aug 20
3
winbind on DC : how use gidNumber instead of primaryGroupID as user's primary group
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Prunk Dump via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 20 augustus 2019 10:20 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] winbind on DC : how use gidNumber > instead of primaryGroupID as user's primary group > > Le lun. 19 ao?t 2019 ? 12:37, Rowland penny via samba
2016 Nov 21
2
Use of gidNumber attribute in user entry
2016-11-21 16:00 GMT+01:00 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > > See inline comments: > > On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 14:47:13 +0000 > Brian Candler via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > A few questions about Unix groups in Samba. > > > > (1) "samba-tool user add" has an option to set --gid-number. However, > >
2016 Nov 21
2
Use of gidNumber attribute in user entry
A few questions about Unix groups in Samba. (1) "samba-tool user add" has an option to set --gid-number. However, I can't see that this attribute is ever used. Can someone confirm if this is true? From digging around previous mailing list postings (*), I surmise the following: - the user's Unix primary gid is taken from their primary *Windows* group (primaryGroupID, which
2019 Jun 05
3
Automatically assigning uidNumber / gidNumber attributes
All, I'm working on a script to automatically assign uidNumber and gidNumber attributes to users. I have a few questions: 1) Which users should be excluded from this assignment? I'm currently using this LDAP filter (simplified syntax used here): (objectClass=user) & (objectCategory=Person) & ~(sAMAccountName=krbtgt*) Specifically, based on recent conversations, I'm
2016 Jul 05
1
winbind idmap_ad rfc2037 can't read UIdnumber
Le 05/07/2016 à 19:40, Rowland penny a écrit : > On 05/07/16 17:56, Raphaël RIGNIER wrote: >> The strange behavior is the different output between group object and >> user object >> >> and >> net ads search -U administrator >> net ads search -P >> >> in Samba Wiki, primarygroupid refers to the one for User's "Unix >>
2019 Aug 22
1
winbind on DC : how use gidNumber instead of primaryGroupID as user's primary group
Le mer. 21 ao?t 2019 ? 17:04, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > > On 21/08/2019 15:14, Prunk Dump via samba wrote: > > Le mer. 21 ao?t 2019 ? 14:34, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> > > a ?crit : > > > >> On 21/08/2019 09:04, Prunk Dump via samba wrote: > >>> Le mar. 20 ao?t 2019 ? 14:30, L.P.H.
2019 May 06
2
Samba with AD : SID rejected
Am 06.05.19 um 16:06 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > Yes, user 'vincent' has uidNumber 10010, gidNumber 13010 and > primaryGroupID 513. > > 513 corresponds to the group "Domain Users", which have gidNumber > 13010 > > Vincent Might this be the problem? He has primaryGroupID set to 513 (hello calssicupgrade?) but "Domain Users" hast a gid of
2018 Jul 23
4
winbind behavior question
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 17:19:07 +0800 d tbsky <tbskyd at gmail.com> wrote: > 2018-07-23 17:02 GMT+08:00 Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org>: > > On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 16:46:50 +0800 > > d tbsky <tbskyd at gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> 2018-07-23 16:04 GMT+08:00 Rowland Penny via samba > >> <samba at lists.samba.org>: >
2017 Jun 30
2
User management scripts in AD mode...
Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > > I'm again a bit confused... ;-((( > Yes I can see that ;-) ;-) Sorry for the late answer, but i was busy on other things... > Hope this helps, but feel free to ask any questions. I try to summarize: a) as i supposed 'RFC2307 group membership' are totally ignored by samba, so i can use RFC2307 schema to
2015 Jun 19
1
(Samba 4.2.2) wbinfo -i does not get the (correct) unix primary group gid
Hi Rowland, > Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Juni 2015 um 13:52 Uhr > Von: "Rowland Penny" <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> > An: samba at lists.samba.org > Betreff: Re: [Samba] (Samba 4.2.2) wbinfo -i does not get the (correct) unix primary group gid > > On 19/06/15 12:26, Frank Grantz wrote: > > Hi Rowland, > > > >> Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Juni 2015