similar to: Mixed Samba4 and 3.6 uids/gids

On 22/12/14 17:22, Denis Cardon wrote: > Hi William, > >> I have an AD domain (Samba 4.1.13 domain controllers) and some Samba 3.6 >> clients. >> I would like the uid/gid mappings to be consistent across the two >> sets of >> machines. >> >> The Samba4 DCs have the following line in smb.conf: >> >> idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes >>

Hi William, > I have an AD domain (Samba 4.1.13 domain controllers) and some Samba 3.6 > clients. > I would like the uid/gid mappings to be consistent across the two sets of > machines. > > The Samba4 DCs have the following line in smb.conf: > > idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes > > and their uids/gids are in sync across all four of them. > > The Samba 3.6 domain

After a user changes their password (CTRL-ALT-DEL) in our Samba 4 domain (4.1.12) they lose access to any stored passwords on their Windows PC. I've set the log level in smb.conf to 4 and enabled the GPO to record DPAPI log entries in Windows to get the below log data. My reading of the two is that the Windows PC believes it is failing to reset the access to its DPAPI store (where the saved

On 22/12/14 19:04, Rowland Penny wrote: >On 22/12/14 17:22, Denis Cardon wrote: >> Hi William, >> >>> I have an AD domain (Samba 4.1.13 domain controllers) and some Samba >>> 3.6 clients. >>> I would like the uid/gid mappings to be consistent across the two >>> sets of machines. >> >> By the way, samba 3.6 is going end of life pretty

On Sat, 20 Oct 2018 17:04:20 +0200 (CEST) tomict via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > OK, I have checked from Windows and my dns looks like this: > > DC2-| > > |- Forward Lookup Zone > > |- samdom.example.com > > You have much more dc2 entries, I only have 4 from my manual > additions. Your dns setup is the same as the setup that

Hi, We have encountered these timeout issues with Samba 4.7 as an RODC too. We created a ticket about it here : https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13502 One thing is that even after the timeouts got resolved, I still get a weird behaviour with two entries that keeps trying to update themselves when I run "samba_dnsupdate". The call succeeds, but the entries are actually

I noticed that rsync can preserve most of the file's characteristics when it is used with "-a" option (it includes -o and -g flags for preserving owners and groups). However, when I transfer data between systems, it affects my UIDs/GIDs, making the data hard to recover. Example: Sending side: /etc/passwd: mark:x:503:503::/home/mark:/bin/bash file: -rw-rw-r-- 1 mark mark

On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 09:50:10 +0200 Denis Cardon via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > A more expeditive way is to delete and recreate the zone using the > samba-tool dns zonedelete / zonecreate. The SRV entries are recreated > when the server restart. You should just be careful about having your > kerberos configuration properly so it does not needs DNS to find its

Hi, For a new samba domain, I need to create users and groups with Unix UIDs and GIDs. In the future, it is possible that there will be a trust with other domains, so I need to take care that there won't be any UID/GID conflict. Also, I assume that in the future Samba will be able to restore deleted objects, so I need to avoid conflicts with those objects as well. This makes me think that a

Is there any SIMPLE way to maintain consistent mappings between windows RIDs and UNIX/LINUX UIDs/GIDs among multiple samba servers servers running winbindd? Will that problem be addressed in future samba releases? I've read about the "idmap backend" possible solution but is that the only current one? Help!!!

Hello, I have a severe problem with gluster: User and Group IDs are broken, but not in all directories: drwxr-xr-x 103 p_kohn01 p0wess 4096 24. Jul 17:22 2013_07_24_17:22_10kupsilon_flat ?--------- ? ? ? ? ? 2013_08_10_00:44_500k_upsilon_flat ?--------- ? ? ? ? ? 2013_08_12_21:54_500k_upsilon_flat_1s drwxr-xr-x 2 p_kohn01 p0wess 6 6.

Le 14/01/2018 à 15:51, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : > On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:53:15 +0100 > Yvan Masson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> For a new samba domain, I need to create users and groups with Unix >> UIDs and GIDs. >> >> In the future, it is possible that there will be a trust with other >> domains, so

Hi All, Yesterday, I've upgraded my Samba server from 3.021c to 3.023 through yum upgrade samba*. I'm running Fedora Core 4 Kernel 2.6.17-1.2142 on this server. After upgrade has been completed, I lost the attributes of ownership and groups. I noticed that the uids/gids have changed for all AD accounts. This means that users can't have total access for their files and no access

Hi Wayne et al, I've been using Linux for a little over a year now. I'm making improvements to the English phrasing used by luckyBackup which uses rsync. English is my first language and I'm doing this so that I can, then, more accurately make translations for the Spanish language. I would like to know how rsync would manage the situation where the UID and GID(s), of a file being

Kevin Korb <kmk <at> sanitarium.net> writes: > > 3) --numeric-ids copies both as the number. This is what you normally > want for backups. This way you have the exact UID and GID stored on > the backups regardless of what those numbers mean to the backup > system. Just remember to use --numeric-ids when you restore. This is > especially important if you have to

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm wondering how essential it is to ensure that Samba User/Group to UIDs/GIDs mapping across various Samba servers remain consistent. I realise that Samba uses the extended ACLs and also uses extended attributes to store blobs of Windows ACL information; specifically the reason for this is that Windows ACLs don't map 1:1 with POSIX

Hello, I?m trying to use winbind to allow my AD users to logon to our linux computers. I?m using FC6 and Samba 3.0.23c-2. I have several problems: 1. When I start linux machine and immediately ofter logging in I try to check trust secret by running wbinfo -t I receive this error: checking the trust secret via RPC calls failed error code was NT_STATUS_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_NOT_FOUND (0xc0000233)

On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:53:15 +0100 Yvan Masson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > For a new samba domain, I need to create users and groups with Unix > UIDs and GIDs. > > In the future, it is possible that there will be a trust with other > domains, so I need to take care that there won't be any UID/GID > conflict. Also, I assume that in the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 No, rsync would store the files with the numeric UID and GID as is on the source without regard to the existence or non-existence of a matching account. This could mean that ls would show numbers in those columns, or incorrect names in those columns, or (perhaps by coincidence) show the correct names in those columns. The important thing is that if

Hello! I've got users that access linux file server from Win stations using Samba and winbind authentication but also have AIX based workstations accessing the same server using nis authentication. They have the same username registered in NIS domain and in Windows domain. Is it possible to map winbind users (usually using uid & gid > 10000) to nis users, so user john