similar to: [Announce] Samba 4.11.5, 4.10.12 and 4.9.18 Security Releases Available

Hi, I understand that bug 12497 was originally made private before the fixes were released, since a CVE was involved. >From the summary details below, I think that some of my DCs might be suffering from this bug and I would like to find out more info on it - however, even after logging into bugzilla I still can't view the details. I'm not sure what samba policy is in cases such as

Hello all, some additional info: Samba version is 4.10.6 on Centos7 with sernet packages. I am using bind_dlz as dns. This happens on all DC regardless if scavening was enabled with the Windows DNS Manager. I enabled one new zone but this still happens. Replication is also not working then as the kcc seqfaults every view seconds. In the release notes it says: This support should however only be

Hello, according to this: https://gitlab.com/samba-team/samba/merge_requests/26 samba should support DNS record scavenging is this only true for the internal DNS or also BIND? Should this work? I enabled it (dns zone scavenging = yes) to try it out and got this (didn't enable it from the DNS Manager tool as I got the error first): Jul 24 16:39:20 dc1 samba[29071]: [2019/07/24

>> >> I was able to get replication working again by deleting DNS records that were conflicting in LDAP. >> >> Used ldapcmp tool to find conflicts >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba-tool_ldapcmp >> > > Ok, the problem seems to be back again. > > Ubuntu 16.04, samba 4.9.3 > > I’ve checked with: samba-tool ldapcmp > between dc1

Hai, Can you run this script on a good DC and the problem DC. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-collect-debug-info.sh Mail me both files. I'll have a quick check. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens M B via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 24 april 2019 14:48 > Aan: samba at

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.15 release series. Important Notes =============== There have been a few regressions in the security release 4.15.2: o CVE-2020-25717: A user on the domain can become root on domain members. https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2020-25717.html ????????????????? PLEASE [RE-]READ! ?????????????????

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.15 release series. Important Notes =============== There have been a few regressions in the security release 4.15.2: o CVE-2020-25717: A user on the domain can become root on domain members. https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2020-25717.html ????????????????? PLEASE [RE-]READ! ?????????????????

I read the 4.9 “Features added" release notes about newly available DNS scavenging features, and the problem with domains that were set up in earlier versions of samba AD. "It is now possible to enable scavenging of DNS Zones to remove DNS records that were dynamically created and have not been touched in some time.” “This support should however only be enabled on new zones or new

Hi! I have some problems with spill/reload and register scavenging which result in illegal code. As our apps, compiled by LLVM and our backend, become more and more complex we have the following problem with our backend: In most cases registers are spilled on function entry to stack slots and reloaded on function exit. At some points registers are spilled and reloaded via register scavenging.

We should test and post: OS, Samba version, and use all same loglevels in smb.conf I tested 4.11.6 with log level = 0 auth_audit:3 Robert is running samba 4.10.12 (not latest) and log level = 4 @Rowland what did you test? Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland penny via samba > Verzonden:

Release Announcements ===================== This is the fourth release candidate of Samba 4.9. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.9 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Release Announcements ===================== This is the fourth release candidate of Samba 4.9. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.9 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Thanks Jon and Hal for the helpful pointers. By returning true from requiresRegisterScavenging() and requiresFrameIndexScavenging(), LLVM handled all the scavenging effort. That is nearly painless for the target, so why do some targets seem to do scavenging on their own? When the scavenged register is loaded with a simple immediate, is it safe to search the BB and replace other uses of the same

======================================================== "Former police chief of Houston once said of me: “Frank Abagnale could write a check on toilet paper, drawn on the Confederate States Treasury, sign it ‘U.R. Hooked’ and cash it at any bank in town, using a Hong Kong driver’s license for identification.” Frank W. Abagnale, Catch Me If You Can: The True Story

======================================================== "Former police chief of Houston once said of me: “Frank Abagnale could write a check on toilet paper, drawn on the Confederate States Treasury, sign it ‘U.R. Hooked’ and cash it at any bank in town, using a Hong Kong driver’s license for identification.” Frank W. Abagnale, Catch Me If You Can: The True Story

Release Announcements ===================== This is the fifth release candidate of Samba 4.9. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.9 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Release Announcements ===================== This is the fifth release candidate of Samba 4.9. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.9 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steve King" <steve at metrokings.com> > To: jonathan at codesourcery.com > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 10:52:19 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] creating a vreg in eliminateFrameIndex() > > Thanks Jon and Hal for the helpful pointers. By returning true from > requiresRegisterScavenging() and

So in my case - is it safe to delete directly using ldbdel or using windows ADSI gui ldap editor? Or is there another way? What is the right way to do it? something like: ldbdel -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb -b"DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=mydomain,DC=com '(dNSTombstoned: TRUE)' ? I read in samba 4.9 new features release notes about scavenging but I'm not sure if it's the

Hi , I use Tranquil IT's repo. Best, Robert 2020. 02. 11. 10:16 keltez?ssel, Rowland penny via samba ?rta: > On 11/02/2020 06:51, Csorba R?bert via samba wrote: >> Hi, >> >> After I have updated my SAMBA AD environment from version 4.9.18 to >> version 4.10.12 on my secondary server the program is unable to start >> and displays the following error