similar to: [Announce] Samba 4.11.2, 4.10.10 and 4.9.15 Security Releases Available

On 03/11/2019 11:37, Michael Lueck via samba wrote: > Greetings Samba team, > > It has been a long time since I needed to ask a Samba technical question. > > Server and workstation are both running the latest Samba packages via > Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. I recently applied the security updates... actually > that was yesterday I applied them. > > >> samba

Greetings Samba team, It has been a long time since I needed to ask a Samba technical question. Server and workstation are both running the latest Samba packages via Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. I recently applied the security updates... actually that was yesterday I applied them. > samba (2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.23) xenial-security; urgency=medium > > * SECURITY UPDATE: client code can

Hi everyone, I've posted some rpm builds of samba 4.11.2, 4.10.10 and 4.9.15 for RHEL/Centos 7.x (currently 7.7). The 4.11 rpms use the python3 and python3-devel rpms introduced in the standard RHEL/Centos repos at the same time as the 7.7 version. Comments and/or testing feedback would be most welcomed. http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.11.2

Hello. Samba 4.1.0pre1-GIT-aad669b, joined as a DC to an existing domain. At least 6 accounts behave like this: Kerberos: AS-REQ techgroup at KLIN.KIFATO-MK.COM from ipv4:192.168.1.31:33822 for krbtgt/KLIN.KIFATO-MK.COM at KLIN.KIFATO-MK.COM ldb: ldb_trace_request: SEARCH dn: <rootDSE> scope: sub expr: (&(objectClass=user)(userPrincipalName=techgroup at KLIN.KIFATO-MK.COM)) control:

On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Konstantin Shalygin wrote: > On 11/5/19 8:26 PM, vincent at cojot.name wrote: >> can you provide more detail? >> >> RHEL7 has libtomcrypt but no devel rpm for it. >> That's the onoy issue I had with it. > > tomcrypt.h is required for build this package. Yes, that's the reason I've rebuilt libtomcrypt from the RHEL sources (see

Hi Konstantin, True, for 4.11.y I didn't backport the changes I made on 4.9.x/4.10.x for glusterfs. Is this what you were talking about? Vincent On Fri, 14 Feb 2020, Konstantin Shalygin via samba wrote: >> Ah, good catch! I'll update it shortly. >> Thanks > > Vincent, this issue still not fixed even for samba 4.11.6 > > > > Thanks, > > k >

On 2/14/20 8:16 PM, vincent at cojot.name wrote: > True, for 4.11.y I didn't backport the changes I made on 4.9.x/4.10.x > for glusterfs. Is this what you were talking about? I mean libtomcrypt-devel is still commented in SPEC. k

Hai, ? If updated the repo's for amd64/i386 . ? Buster????samba 4.10.10 Stretch???samba 4.9.15 + 4.10.10 Bionic??? samba 4.9.15 + 4.10.10 ? No changes made by me. ? Repo info : https://apt.van-belle.nl/ ? Have fun with these.. ? ? Greetz, ? Louis ? ?

Sorry.. Centos.. yum update I dont know the Centos version of apt dist-upgrade. But check if ldb tdb tevent are upgrade. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > L.P.H. van Belle via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 10 juli 2019 10:12 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] error in

Am 10.07.19 um 14:39 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > Reindl/Harald, > > What is your first name? Sorry for asking, but always wondered about it. > I just wanted to note here that... Harald > 1) I have seen this also if samba is upgraded and not restarted. won't happen on original CentOS packages, they have restart triggers in the spec files > 2) if a packages is

Hi sambalist, I'm using sernet samba for several years. I found that there's error in the log.samba file like this: [2019/07/10 14:55:25.892988, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:79(fault_report) =============================================================== [2019/07/10 14:55:25.893187, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:80(fault_report) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 9906

Reindl/Harald, What is your first name? Sorry for asking, but always wondered about it. I just wanted to note here that... 1) I have seen this also if samba is upgraded and not restarted. Or 2) if a packages is not upgrade because an extra package is also needed at install. And that should be tested/checked/tried out first and if that all fails, then its needed to contact sernet support.

Hai, I have released the bionic-samba411 for amd64/i386, as in, these are now available in the repo. Ubuntu Bionic samba 4.11.2 Repo info : https://apt.van-belle.nl/ Buildlogs are also coming online, you can find these here for samba 4.11.2 http://downloads.van-belle.nl/samba4/Buildlogs/bionic/ If you upgrading from 4.10.X, due to a move of one file your upgrade will stop, its needed

Hi again. I apologize for my vague previous question. After some investigation I can be much more precise in my consult. Furthermore, I think I found a bug... Context: -Samba4 AD DC working fine with many user and machine accouns. -Windows7 client trying to connect via sqlplus to an oracle database residing in a Windows2008 server. Both machines are in the domain. -Server database is using

Anyone? My next concern is codepages. The latest source (I've moved to 4.5.5 now) doesn't have any >> codepages. The RPM spec file I'm customising lists and wants to install them here: >> >> /usr/share/samba/codepages >> /usr/share/samba/codepages/lowcase.dat >> /usr/share/samba/codepages/upcase.dat >> /usr/share/samba/codepages/valid.dat >>

The patch titled Subject: ufs: don't flush page immediately for DIRSYNC directories has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is ufs-dont-flush-page-immediately-for-dirsync-directories.patch This patch will shortly appear at

We've been having issues with the samba process PANICing for some time now (approx 24 months, though the log files have rotated so I can't give an exact date). For most of this time it was an annoyance - it occurred perhaps once a fortnight and didn't cause great disruption. Around the end of 2019 the PANIC's became more frequent. When they occur machines attempting to authenticate

On 15/02/17 14:40, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > On 13/02/17 10:18, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >> On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 10:00 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: >>> On 12/02/17 03:13, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>>> On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:34:23 +1100 >>>> Tom Robinson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>>>

Hello all, ? this is my first Post in a Mailing List I hope everything goes fine. ? We are running a Samba 4 DC (4.0.14, Version 4.1.4 has the same problem) as a second DC in our Windows Environment. This server is in a second site. ? So after a while Samba 4 hangs and it is not possible to talk to the server via the RPC Protocol. So all samba-tools Commands like ?samba-tool drs showrepl? run

On 03/03/15 09:56, Izan D?ez S?nchez wrote: > Hi again. I apologize for my vague previous question. After some > investigation I can be much more precise in my consult. Furthermore, I > think I found a bug... > > Context: > -Samba4 AD DC working fine with many user and machine accouns. > -Windows7 client trying to connect via sqlplus to an oracle database > residing in a