similar to: tinc version 1.1

On Tue, 5 May 2020 13:32:50 +0100 Jonathan Plews <SRS0=286U=6T=yahoo.co.uk=pl3w5y at mijnuvt.nl> wrote: > I didn't study the internals but maybe changing DirectOnly, Forwarding > and IndirectData will have an impact on per packet performance and > speed stability by disabling some of the meshing features? I will definitely try those. > Although it probably just hit the CPU

On Sat, 16 May 2015, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 12:09:52AM +0200, Sven-Haegar Koch wrote: > > > This change is not so good: > > > > Connection with aaa_vpnhub1 (1.2.3.4 port 443) activated > > Error while translating addresses: ai_family not supported > > > > (And then the tinc process exists) > > Hm, I couldn't reproduce

On Fri, 15 May 2015, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:26:46PM +0200, Sven-Haegar Koch wrote: > > > Another strange and difficult to understand thing - seems like all the > > easy bugs in 1.1 are gone ;) > [...] > > Got ADD_EDGE from aaa_vpnhub1 (1.2.3.4 port 443) for haegar_tokamak > > -> igor which does not match existing entry (Local

Hi everybody. Is there a way to have a list of reacheable partners and its connection status? I need to list all partners in any tinc instance, its status (connected / disconnected) and connection method (direct, relayed thru other partner, etc.) Thanks! -- *Ing. Guillermo Bisheimer* *B&S Sistemas de Control y Equipamientos* Av. de los Constituyentes 1172 (E3116CIX) Crespo, Entre Ríos

Hallo, I have a couple of tinc hosts in the same network, some using the latest tinc 1.1 git and some using 1.0.24. It seems like traffic between 1.1 and 1.0 nodes is always transfered using TCP (and an intermediate node, if not directly connected), never with UDP. Viewed from host W (tinc 1.1): (All after successfully pinging an IP behind the remote side to trigger UDP path probing, and

Hallo, Another strange and difficult to understand thing - seems like all the easy bugs in 1.1 are gone ;) waehring (1.1) | +-------------------+--------------+ | | | vpnhub1 (1.1) igor (1.1) turing (1.0) | | | +-------------------+--------------+ | tokamak Whenever another node outside of the graph connects to vpnhub or igor

Hi all, As title, is that possible to develop a python version of tinc, that will be interesting:) Tks. Cong -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc-devel/attachments/20161213/fcd83914/attachment.html>

Hi - Thanks to Sven-Haegar and Donald, but still having issues setting up with Windows. Machine1 can't ping the VPN address of machine2. Regular IPv4 address for both machines in 192.168.1.xxx range. Router: Forwarding port 655 to 101.102.103.1, UDP and TCP Forwarding port 656 to 101.102.103.2, UDP and TCP Tinc.conf on machine user1 just three lines: Name = vpnuser1 ConnectTo =

HI, Is there an init script to start stop tinc tinc-1.1pre10 for debian. I am running tinc -n name --pidfile /dir/name start from /etc/rc.local sometimes it's not creating the pid file but I see the process running. It would be great if we can manage it from /etc/init.d/ Thanks Anil -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I'm writing a storage app for storing the Ed25519 pub keys and want to do some basic verification when a user submits their public key. Is it just A-Za-z0-9 ? or can it contain special chars as well? I'm assuming it will be in the range of printable characters? Martin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, Thanks to John Wice for helping me with an earlier question. My two PCs behind the same router are still having problems connecting. Would appreciate thoughts on what I?m doing wrong? Router: Port 655 forwarded to 192.168.1.45, both TCP and UDP Port 656 forwarded to 192.168.1.51, both TCP and UDP Machine #1. ========== Local IP address on LAN = 192.168.1.45 Windows Firewall

Hi all, wasnt sure whether this was the best place to put this information; but something seems to have gone 'backwards' in the later pre-releases of 6.03 regarding network booting. below are results of me testing - i did each a few times to make sure they are valid results. hope it helps identify something that's gone awry ? so far, 6.03 pre11 and pre13 (excluding efi32) seem most

Hallo, trying to compile the current 1.1 git snapshot under Debian Wheezy gives me: configure.ac:7: option `info-in-builddir' not recognized autoreconf: automake failed with exit status: 1 Do I now need a specific newer version of automake? Seems to be the result of commit 13f9bc1ff199bea46 "Add support for out-of-tree ("VPATH") builds." Undoing the change to

> > From: Matt Fleming [matt at console-pimps.org] > > Sent: 25 June 2014 07:39 > > To: Andrew Rae > > Cc: Gene Cumm; syslinux at zytor.com > > Subject: Re: [syslinux] testing out 6.03 network booting... > > > > Andrew, could you try out syslinux-6.03-pre18? Peter pushed the release > > button yesterday and -pre18 contains my change. It would be

Hello, Please tell me if it's possible to use tinc together with OSPF (instead of static routes in LAN). By OSPF I mean Quagga's GNU/Linux daemon. Namely, I have a group of LANs (private 192.168.x.0/24 each). Each LAN has a GNU/Linux default gateway, 192.168.x.1, that also connects to the Internet via a public IP address (does NAT and firewall for the LAN "behind" it). tinc

Saverio My current tinc 1.0.35 is running fine on CentOS, and recently and I upgrade the OpenSSL of the OS to 1.1.1a. After the upgrade, tinc works fine, but since the OpenSSL library is on a separate folder compared with previous version, I doubt tinc doesn’t use the new OpenSSL. Also, I doubted about whether tinc 1.0.35 support OpenSSL 1.1.1a as well, should I use the lastest tinc 1.1pre7 to

Especially you who are doing large-scale network booting, please try out 4.10-pre17 *and report the results*. I'm hoping with Gene Cumm's fixes that we have can promote this to a full release shortly, but I really need test reports -- good or bad. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

On Thu, 7 May 2020, Pallinger Péter wrote: > Also, my question about the stability of tinc 1.1 still stands. Is it > ready for production? I am personally only using tinc 1.1 pre17+git, but in our network are also still some older nodes. No problems seen currently. c'ya sven-haegar -- Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead. - Ben F.

Let's try to get this thing released. Dag: will you do your RPM buildathon on this drop? Changes in 3.74: * New UI directive, which allows a more natural way to specify a menu system (or not.) With the UI directive specifying the menu system, the DEFAULT directive can be used to select the default entry inside the menus. * kbdmap.c32: new module

Hi, I finally managed to test pxelinux 4.10 pre17 in our VMware environment and can report that HTTP booting seems to work reliably now. Downloads are fairly fast. As a side note, rosh "ls" and "pwd" commands now work as expected with a HTTP TFTP prefix, cool! I'll leave it in production use now and report about any further issues. Can you already tell when a 4.10