similar to: tinc performance relatively slow

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1400 matches similar to: "tinc performance relatively slow"

2020 May 05
2
tinc performance relatively slow
On Mon, 4 May 2020 18:45:19 +0200 (CEST) Sven-Haegar Koch <haegar at sdinet.de> wrote: > On Mon, 4 May 2020, Pallinger Péter wrote: > > > ------- TL;DR ------- > > > > Performance seems slow (around 300-400Mbit peak). > > How to improve? > > Not sure if that could be the case for you, my links are not that > fast: > > Make sure to disable
2020 May 07
2
tinc performance relatively slow
On Tue, 5 May 2020 13:32:50 +0100 Jonathan Plews <SRS0=286U=6T=yahoo.co.uk=pl3w5y at mijnuvt.nl> wrote: > I didn't study the internals but maybe changing DirectOnly, Forwarding > and IndirectData will have an impact on per packet performance and > speed stability by disabling some of the meshing features? I will definitely try those. > Although it probably just hit the CPU
2020 May 05
0
tinc performance relatively slow
On Tue, 5 May 2020 10:56:01 +0200 Pallinger Péter <pallinger at dsd.sztaki.hu> wrote: > On Mon, 4 May 2020 18:45:19 +0200 (CEST) > Sven-Haegar Koch <haegar at sdinet.de> wrote: > > On Mon, 4 May 2020, Pallinger Péter wrote: > > > > Make sure to disable compression, that is a known CPU hog. > > Compression was disabled. I've successfully slowed
2015 May 16
1
tinc 1.1 "Got ADD_EDGE ... which does not match existing entry"
On Sat, 16 May 2015, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 12:09:52AM +0200, Sven-Haegar Koch wrote: > > > This change is not so good: > > > > Connection with aaa_vpnhub1 (1.2.3.4 port 443) activated > > Error while translating addresses: ai_family not supported > > > > (And then the tinc process exists) > > Hm, I couldn't reproduce
2016 Sep 21
2
List of reacheable partners
Hi everybody. Is there a way to have a list of reacheable partners and its connection status? I need to list all partners in any tinc instance, its status (connected / disconnected) and connection method (direct, relayed thru other partner, etc.) Thanks! -- *Ing. Guillermo Bisheimer* *B&S Sistemas de Control y Equipamientos* Av. de los Constituyentes 1172 (E3116CIX) Crespo, Entre Ríos
2008 Jan 25
3
Bug#462468: nut: megatec_usb ups not detected since 2.2.1 update anymore
Hi Sven, 2008/1/25, Sven Koch <haegar at sdinet.de>: > Package: nut > Version: 2.2.1-1 > Severity: normal > > I am using a Mustec PowerMust 1000 USB, connected with a USB cable to > the PC. > > With nut 2.2.0-2.1 everything works without problems - but since the > 2.2.1-1 update the "upsdrvctl start" from the init script just fails, > executing the
2020 May 04
0
tinc performance relatively slow
On Mon, 4 May 2020, Pallinger Péter wrote: > ------- TL;DR ------- > > Performance seems slow (around 300-400Mbit peak). > How to improve? Not sure if that could be the case for you, my links are not that fast: Make sure to disable compression, that is a known CPU hog. Greetings, Haegar -- Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead. - Ben F.
2016 Dec 12
4
Is that possible develop a python version of tinc?
Hi all, As title, is that possible to develop a python version of tinc, that will be interesting:) Tks. Cong -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc-devel/attachments/20161213/fcd83914/attachment.html>
2020 May 07
0
tinc performance relatively slow
On Thu, 7 May 2020, Pallinger Péter wrote: > Also, my question about the stability of tinc 1.1 still stands. Is it > ready for production? I am personally only using tinc 1.1 pre17+git, but in our network are also still some older nodes. No problems seen currently. c'ya sven-haegar -- Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead. - Ben F.
2015 May 15
2
tinc 1.1 "Got ADD_EDGE ... which does not match existing entry"
On Fri, 15 May 2015, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:26:46PM +0200, Sven-Haegar Koch wrote: > > > Another strange and difficult to understand thing - seems like all the > > easy bugs in 1.1 are gone ;) > [...] > > Got ADD_EDGE from aaa_vpnhub1 (1.2.3.4 port 443) for haegar_tokamak > > -> igor which does not match existing entry (Local
2015 Jul 21
1
Please help debug Windows setup
Hi - Thanks to Sven-Haegar and Donald, but still having issues setting up with Windows. Machine1 can't ping the VPN address of machine2. Regular IPv4 address for both machines in 192.168.1.xxx range. Router: Forwarding port 655 to 101.102.103.1, UDP and TCP Forwarding port 656 to 101.102.103.2, UDP and TCP Tinc.conf on machine user1 just three lines: Name = vpnuser1 ConnectTo =
2009 Nov 16
2
tcp-only still needed?
Hi there, we are using tinc in switched mode for over a year now, currently with 18 clients which are connected 24 hours a day and many which aren't connected the whole day, also. If i'm reading the changes from 1.0.9 to 1.0.10 and 1.0.11 correctly, tinc should work now, although "TCPOnly = yes" isn't set in the config files of clients which are behind a NAT firewall, e.g. a
2015 May 13
2
tinc 1.1 never seems to accept UDP packets from 1.0.24 hosts
Hallo, I have a couple of tinc hosts in the same network, some using the latest tinc 1.1 git and some using 1.0.24. It seems like traffic between 1.1 and 1.0 nodes is always transfered using TCP (and an intermediate node, if not directly connected), never with UDP. Viewed from host W (tinc 1.1): (All after successfully pinging an IP behind the remote side to trigger UDP path probing, and
2015 Nov 22
2
Re: installation error
Thank you, The apt was set to look in the wheezy instead of the jessie one. > On 22 Nov 2015, at 13:30, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 05:12:19AM +0200, Keresztes Péter-Zoltán wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am trying to install libguestfs on a proxmox (debian jessie with some custom packages) and when I run make at a certain
2015 May 15
2
tinc 1.1 "Got ADD_EDGE ... which does not match existing entry"
Hallo, Another strange and difficult to understand thing - seems like all the easy bugs in 1.1 are gone ;) waehring (1.1) | +-------------------+--------------+ | | | vpnhub1 (1.1) igor (1.1) turing (1.0) | | | +-------------------+--------------+ | tokamak Whenever another node outside of the graph connects to vpnhub or igor
2017 Mar 14
2
Re: virt-customize fail to inject firstboot script when running it from script.
We are enforcing #!/bin/bash at the beginning of the scripts and bash is installed in every guest. Regards, Peter 2017. márc. 14. dátummal, 16:14 időpontban Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> írta: >> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 03:45:34PM +0200, Keresztes Péter-Zoltán wrote: >> I am running libguestfs version 1.34.2 > > As far as I know, this version should contain
2014 Jul 01
3
Re: libguestfs on proxmox
Unfortunately I cannot use the latest version of libguestfs therefore I am stuck with the 1.20 since the newest versions need augeas 1.0.0 where debian wheezy has only 0.7 in it’s repository. But I will try to compile the ocaml 4.01 and see what is the result. Keresztes Péter-Zoltán zozo@z0z0.tk I haven’t lost my mind, I know exactly where I left it. On 01 Jul 2014, at 18:19, Richard W.M. Jones
2014 Jul 01
3
libguestfs on proxmox
Hello, I have an issue with virt-resize on the newest version of proxmox which is running on debian wheezy. when I run the virt-resize on a windows 2008 qemu image I got an error. Here is the last part of the debug message: Copying /dev/sda1 ... libguestfs: trace: copy_device_to_device "/dev/sda1" "/dev/sdb1" "size:32210026496" 100%
2014 Jul 01
2
Re: libguestfs on proxmox
OK, that seam to work however it is not exactly the correct solution for me since I need to make it one command to be able to call it from an API I have no name!@(none):/# ntfsresize /dev/sda1 ntfsresize v2012.1.15AR.5 (libntfs-3g) ERROR: Volume is scheduled for check. Run chkdsk /f and please try again, or see option -f. I have no name!@(none):/# chkdsk /f bash: chkdsk: command not found I have
2015 May 13
0
tinc 1.1: d237efd32 "Only read one record at a time in sptps_receive_data()." breaks invite-join.test
Hallo, As part of building a debian package for my use of tinc 1.1 I run the "make check" testsuites. The current git breaks in invite-join.test: FAIL: invite-join ================= + ../src/tinc --config=/home/haegar/tinc/tinc/test/./invite-join.test.1 --pidfile=/home/haegar/tinc/tinc/test/./invite-join.test.1/pid Generating 2048 bits keys: ...........................+++ p ....+++