similar to: tinc memory usage very high for some instances

On Mon, 4 May 2020 18:45:19 +0200 (CEST) Sven-Haegar Koch <haegar at sdinet.de> wrote: > On Mon, 4 May 2020, Pallinger Péter wrote: > > > ------- TL;DR ------- > > > > Performance seems slow (around 300-400Mbit peak). > > How to improve? > > Not sure if that could be the case for you, my links are not that > fast: > > Make sure to disable

On Tue, 5 May 2020 10:56:01 +0200 Pallinger Péter <pallinger at dsd.sztaki.hu> wrote: > On Mon, 4 May 2020 18:45:19 +0200 (CEST) > Sven-Haegar Koch <haegar at sdinet.de> wrote: > > On Mon, 4 May 2020, Pallinger Péter wrote: > > > > Make sure to disable compression, that is a known CPU hog. > > Compression was disabled. I've successfully slowed

curiosity: are there routers out there supporting tinc natively? for a typical host -connectTo-> mainTincBoxes I use Railtrack https://github.com/JeevesTakesOver/Railtrack however it looks to me that your question was more about orchestration, python fabric or ansible are probably your best options for this task On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 at 09:40, al so <volkswak at gmail.com> wrote:

Peter, I think I agree with your answers to my comments. But it is so difficult to track the questions and answers when written! I've created a network diagram of my setup, and it may help!I'll attached the PDF to this email, but it might get stripped. If so, do email me directly. John   1. Problem with connecting another subnet (jradxl at yahoo.com)   2. Re: Problem with connecting

On 8.2.19. 17:01, jradxl at yahoo.com wrote: > Hello Peter, Hi John, > Your question is similar to my recent question, and I have a similar Ping problem.But yours, with two Tinc networks, is more complex than mine. > > All I can say, and I hope it helps, is that in my case I have found my Ubuntu Tinc Server nodes Ah, forgot to mention that I use Debian 9 here. > do not like

Hello tinc mailing list! Nice to be accepted here :) So I've been using tinc for a while just for itself and now I would like to use it to route to another network. To be exact I have two tinc networks with a "central node" that is connected to both tincs: tiutl: 172.16.0.0/24 tiosp: 172.16.1.0/24 I'm doing that because I can then do fancy firewalling on that central node.

Am 21.02.22 um 16:24 schrieb Fabian Arrotin: > On 21/02/2022 15:49, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: >> Hey all, back from vacation and seeing ansible 2.12 in the repos now. >> Anything to be aware of when upgrading from 2.9 to 2.12 in CS8? >> > > You'd be lucky if it works directly , as there were some semantic > changes in ansible, so you'll probably have to

I just don't know what else to try. I've beat my head on this for 3 days now and it's becoming obvious that either Ansible 2.3 is a complete disaster, or the CentOS 7 package is a complete cluster. Here's my problem. I am working on getting an ansible server to manage about 100 or so CentOS 6 servers. All have an unprivileged user account setup (up to 3 years before I got

Hi, I'm trying to set up provisioning LXC container running CentOS. And among other things, I need to install nginx + passenger from a non-official repo (the docs: https://www.phusionpassenger.com/library/install/nginx/install/oss/el7/). With this playbook: - hosts: all tasks: # https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/yum_repository_module.html - name: Add repository yum_repository:

As others have said, in the end, it's a matter of personal preference (e.g. vim or emacs). You could spend a week reading articles and forum discussions comparing all the different tools; but until you've really used them, it will mostly be an academic exercise. Of course, the particulars of your environment might naturally lend itself to one tool or the other, so it's certainly

On 03/09/2020 20:51, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: > > What would you recommend: ansible is in EPEL8 and ConfigSIG. > For the latter I do not see any sources in git.centos.org. > Where they come from? > > I wonder with which repository I should use (long term)? > > dnf not checking gpg signature sounds scary: > >

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 03:41:00PM +0000, Chris . wrote: > I admit that I am not familiar with Tinc very well, but have Tinc running at approximately 20 sites and functioning as a mesh vpn/network. I am having issues adding an additional site as it will not communicate with the rest. I have taken the firmware of one and flashed it on another router to make it duplicate and then tested it

On 11 Apr 2018 09:48 Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 11/04/18 13:58, James Hogarth wrote: > > For those not aware ansible has been deprecated in RHEL7 from the extras > > repository. > > > > In the RHEL specific world it's now in an optional "product" (basically an > > optional subscription) that is part of any RHEL subscription, but it's opt >

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:37:24PM +0530, Anil Moris wrote: > I have a use case where my tinc.conf ConnectTo can go upto 20 + hosts. > > I am planning to automate a periodic cleanup of ConnectTo in the tinc.conf > file, the issue is I am not able to figure out which ConnectTo is been used > and which are stale, say NOT used in last 2 to 3 days. > > I want to remove those

Hi Bob, On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 09:31:59 -0400, Robert Buck <robert.buck at som.com> wrote: > It seems as though, when I go from `clustering = no` to `clustering = yes`, > if I do a domain join, it will fail. However, if I do a `systemctl restart > ctdb` (knowing full well it will fail every time), if after this I add a > sleep(15), then do a domain join, then do a `systemctl

On 11/04/18 13:58, James Hogarth wrote: > For those not aware ansible has been deprecated in RHEL7 from the extras > repository. > > In the RHEL specific world it's now in an optional "product" (basically an > optional subscription) that is part of any RHEL subscription, but it's opt > in. > > As a result ansible is back in the EPEL7 repository for

I admit that I am not familiar with Tinc very well but see that Tinc is running their current vpn connections. We have a scenario that has 20 different sites currently and successfully using tinc on openwrt but I am having issues adding an additional site as it will not communicate with the rest. I am not the one that originally setup the system but that person is no longer available. I have

Check sambabox.io On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 00:01 Darin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello all, > > So I am working on a group policy-like system based around Ansible. > Essentially, I am going to use Ansible playbooks as a cross-platform > alternative to the Windows registry and Group Policy Objects (GPOs). In > Samba, the way the group policy is applied

Hello Peter, Your question is similar to my recent question, and I have a similar Ping problem.But yours, with two Tinc networks, is more complex than mine. All I can say, and I hope it helps, is that in my case I have found my Ubuntu Tinc Server nodes do not like being specified as a address on the same network as the local LANsSo I have a specific network for the Tinc Server nodes, and in this

thanks Guus for the quick response. I am using tinc 1.1 if I use AutoConnect = yes then will it automatically remove connections that are no longer in use? What are the security issues with 'AutoConnect = yes' I should be worried? for my use case I might go upto 20 to 30 + tinc hosts connected to single tinc box. as per the doc AutoConnect = yes is experimental, I am using it in our