similar to: Cannot ping subnet hosts

I have done it... added on both routers a new firewall zone covering the tinc interface, policy in accept, out accept, fwd accept, interzone forwarding from/to LAN.... when I do it, I am not even able to ping the routers between them, even though the PING PONG is ok in the tinc debug.... 2018-05-24 20:28 GMT+02:00 Naemr . <naemrr at gmail.com>: > did you add a forwarding allow rule from

did you add a forwarding allow rule from tinc interface to lan and vise versa on both ends? even with firewall off default is to not forward till told to do so. On Thu, May 24, 2018, 10:07 AM Davide L <davide.lovreglio at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear all, > > I am trying to configure a basic TINC vpn between two sites using OpenWRT > routers. The link seems to work, the ping

I have a three tinc server setup, similar to "4.3 How Connections Work" using the configuration mostly likehttp://ostolc.org/site-to-site-vpn-with-tinc.html The clients (Ubuntus, Debians and Windows 10s) can all ping (and SSH) to each other remotely. As far as that is concerned it's working great - thanks so much for some great software. However, on each of the Tinc servers (A and

Guus, Thank you for your help (a)>>You said:- First, if you are already using "ip" to assign an address..... Why should I use "ip route" instead of "route add..." Surely both write same to the Routing table? (b) My problem was, that Tinc servers could not ping remote clients, whereas clients could ping successfully across VPNWhen pinging Client to Client

Hi List, I am new at this and trying to set up shorewall. I was using mnf-en to do it but it was using an old version of shorewall (shorewall-2.0.8-2mdk) and didn''t have the features I wanted. So I''ve installed shorewall-2.4.0-1mdk. Other bits of interest: iproute2-2.6.10-1mdk iptables-1.2.9-8mdk I''m trying to get the providers feature working. show capabilities:

* Thomas Leuxner <tlx at leuxner.net> 2015.08.25 09:45: > > http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/64c73e6bd397 > > ==> /var/log/dovecot/dovecot.log <== > Aug 25 09:42:07 nihlus dovecot: imap(tlx at leuxner.net): Error: net_connect_unix(/var/run/dovecot/imap-hibernate) failed: Permission denied > Aug 25 09:42:07 nihlus dovecot: imap(tlx at leuxner.net): Error:

Thank you, Parke and Guus. I have now understood and got it working. Because of my beginner belief, I assumed that the tinc vpn end points needed to be on the same network. I have now discovered that the tinc vpn IP end points addresses can be arbitrary, and different! So I have set the end points to be local to the LAN they connect, and added on each tinc server a dev route to ensure

Hi, I've been struggling for almost a week now, but I can't get the following setup to work. At home I have class A network: 10.0.0.0/16 with a masquerading gateway 10.0.0.1 running tinc. At work (http://www.eastsite.nl) we have a 192.168.0.0/24 network. The gateway is called 'ed' I've set up tinc on 'gateway' and everything is working fine from

http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/64c73e6bd397 Today I finally committed the "imap-hibernate" feature that I first started developing about a year ago (and had been thinking about for several years before that). The main purpose here is to reduce the number of imap processes and the amount of memory they use by moving IDLEing connections into imap-hibernate processes where they are

Hi All, I am trying to setup the site-to-site VPN with TINC for connect my home network to company network. Here is the IP allocation and configuration for your reference. Home PC (192.168.1.2) ?-----? Home (OPENWRT Router, 192.168.1.1, 10.0.0.1) ?----------------? INTERNET ?-------------? COMPANY (Windows 7 PC,192.168.2.1, 10.0.0.2) ?------------? COMPANY (SERVER ZONE) ?----? SERVER A

Hi Who concern, I setup TINC VPN follow these. 192.168.1.x / 24 (Client groups) | 192.168.1.1 (eth1) (GW1) 202.44.34.206 (eth0) || Internet || 202.44.45.14 (eth0) (GW2) 192.168.2.1 (eth1)

Hi - I have shorewall-1.3.8-1 on a RH 7.3 machine that acts as a firewall for my network. It was running the other day just fine, but today I have problems getting to the firewall. It is a frame-relay network with Cisco routers. Everything is 192.168.x.x / 24. I can''t ping the firewall from the WAN, but can from the main LAN. Sounds like a routing issue to me, but it was working for

--Multipart_Thu_Oct__9_10:41:03_1997-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII In case you did not realize how much this is related to R : --Multipart_Thu_Oct__9_10:41:03_1997-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Return-Path: s-sender@utstat.toronto.edu From: "Steven M. Boker" <sboker@calliope.psych.nd.edu> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 97 16:37:05 -0500 To: s-news@utstat.toronto.edu Subject:

I have a server, server A, with three NICs: two to the Internet via separate ADSL modems, and one to the LAN. The two ''net'' interfaces are configured as described at http://www.shorewall.net/MultiISP.html. This has been working for a number of months. I am now testing an OpenVPN link between server A and another (currently single-ISP) server (server B). I can establish the VPN

I am not proxying the media, but never the less I am forced to store the source media IP in my CDR, for regulatory reasons. Asterisk gets that information when the reinvite comes, but how do I store it? If I don't figure this out my next email will be from Federal Prison. Kindly help me stay away from those guys. Eventually we all need to save that information or we shall not be able to stay

A number of weeks ago I had huge help from many of you configuring routing on a server with multiple Internet facing nics. Thanks for all of your help!!!! I am still having a routing issue that I am hoping someone can help me tweek. This server, besides acting as our gateway to the internet, is also our web and email server. The server has 4 nics. Two are connected to the internet and the

Hi, I just set up tinc between two hosts (for now). All seems to work fine, but now I run in to a routing issue: I gave both of my vpn routers an IP in the 172.16.100.0/24 range, and used the Subnet-directive to inform tinc of this. This works fine, I can ping both hosts from both sides of the vpn. Ofcourse both vpn routers give access to other subnets, but they don't know the IP-ranges

I've asked a couple of other questions on here, which people have kindly answered and I'm waiting for the opportunity to implement what they have suggested. In the meantime: We are running out of IP addresses! We currently use 192.168.2.0/24 and it's proving to not be enough addresses. I'm considering changing to 192.168.4.0/22 to virtually quadruple the number of addresses we

opensuse 10/find / samba-3.0.20b-3.3 I'm trying to change directory permissions on a share so all users can modify files in the share and when I do as suggested in Ch15 of Samba Howto the following happens $ find `directory_name' -type d -exec chown nobody:users {}\; find: missing argument to `-exec' Chris Boyd Systems Engineer USIT 19-21 Aston Quay Dublin 2 Ireland Tel: +353 1

Hi all! This is a repost to this list, hoping to draw some extra attention because I got NO reply whatsoever to the original posting :( I would really appreciate if someone could comment om which of both strategies as described below is best. I am having some trouble with a samba domain distributed over 2 subnets (192.168.0.0/23 (supernetted) & 192.168.4.0/24). These subnets are