similar to: dns resolution behind proxy

Hello Guus, thanks for Your fast reply. Does it mean only socks is affected and http proxy should work? If this is the case then this may be a temp. solution. Thanks and regards! Uwe Am 27.10.2015 14:08:36, schrieb Guus Sliepen: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 12:33:35PM +0000, Uwe Werler wrote: > > > I wonder why tinc tries to resolve host names before connection even > > with

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 02:08:36PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote: > > I wonder why tinc tries to resolve host names before connection even > > with configured (socks5) proxy which fails behind restrictive firewalls. > > [...] I'll try to change tinc so it will allow connections via SOCKS5 > even if it cannot resolve the hostname itself. I added the ability for tinc to

Hi List, I''m trying to get my ListCtrl to work. Currently I''ve managed to fill my ListCtrl with items, but I think it''s not the most beautiful way: class MyList < Wx::ListCtrl def initialize(parent, *args) super(parent, :style => Wx::LC_REPORT|LC_HRULES ) create_layout fill_list end def create_layout self.insert_column(0, "Name")

> Winton-- > > Excellent! Absolutely wonderful. > > I'm wondering which apps/encapsulators support 4A? This gets me > around > the DNS leakage problem quite nicely. > > Incidentally, we do need SOCKS5 support -- if for no other > reason, the > fact that there's *operating system* level support in OSX for SOCKS5 > redirection. So

Hi all. I was getting something working over socks5 and was trying to figure out why it kept using socks4. It wasn't, it was just a misleading debug message.... Patch applies to either OpenBSD or Portable. -- Darren Tucker (dtucker at zip.com.au) GPG key 8FF4FA69 / D9A3 86E9 7EEE AF4B B2D4 37C9 C982 80C7 8FF4 FA69 Good judgement comes with experience. Unfortunately, the experience

is openssh going to ever contain socks4/5 proxy support (http://www.socks.nec.com/) the same way ssh (nonfree version) does? Without this support, openssh is completely unusable behind a firewall. Hayden A. James

Hi there, I'm Vladimir Olteanu (or just Vlad, for short), and I'm working on the SOCKSv6 protocol. It is being discussed at the IETF (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-olteanu-intarea-socks-6-10). The spec has matured somewhat and is currently undergoing an adoption call at the Intarea WG. I would like to get your opinion on this newer version of the protocol, in particular on how

Attached is a very small patch that allows the ssh clients to use the socks5 library. It should work with socks4 but is untested. Tested on linux only configure --with-socks configure --with-socks5 Also included is a configure option to disable scp statistics --disable-scp-stats modified files openssh-2.9.9p2/acconfig.h openssh-2.9.9p2/channels.c openssh-2.9.9p2/configure.in

Hi all, I am currently deploying tinc as an alternative to OpenVPN. My setup includes a lot of nodes and some of them are sitting together behind the same router on the same network segment. (E.g. connected to the same switch.) I noticed, that those nodes do never talk directly to each other via their private ip-addresses, but instead use the NATed address they got from the router.

Is there any plan to add socks 4 or socks 5 support to openssh like the original ssh developed in finland?? Michael Michael at bizsystems.com

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 12:33:35PM +0000, Uwe Werler wrote: > I wonder why tinc tries to resolve host names before connection even > with configured (socks5) proxy which fails behind restrictive firewalls. You are right that it shouldn't be necessary to do this with SOCKS5. With SOCKS4, it needs to know the exact address, and then I just used that for SOCKS5 as well. > Is there

Hi, Some programs, which requires network, do not support proxy mechanism such as SOCKS5. There is a tool called proxychains (http://proxychains.sf.net) which provides us to redirect all of the network traffic to a defined server can be SOCKS4, 5, or others. For instance, I can use proxychains wget http://www.google.com to download the homepage of google if I am behind the proxy. This is quiet

This provides SOCKS4A support, which allows a SOCKS4 client to provide a host name instead of an IP address. It indicates that it's doing so by using a known-invalid IP address 0.0.0.x (where x != 0), and then appending the NUL-terminated hostname to the connection request. Although we check for the terminating NUL manually and the 'fatal(len %d > have %d)' should never happen, the

My desire is to form a connection from my laptop running ubuntu to a SOCKS5 server listed on the Internet. I have read the Ubuntu man page on OpenSSH client program. The description indicates that I have to connect to given host name (assumed to be an ip address?) with optional username. I want the server receive my Internet traffic in SOCKS5 protocol and respond to my computer the requested

I love SSH's ability to dynamically forward ports using SOCKS (either -D or DynamicForward) (ie "ssh -D 1081 private.mine.net"). But the thing that has caused me some pain, is that only SOCKS4 is supported. The SOCKS4 proxy specification does not permit hostnames, but only IP addresses. This isn't much of a problem if the target host is a public Internet host or otherwise DNS

Folks, I've just released the first prelease for the 5.10 series. The intention is to leave 5.02-pre3 where it is and move to 5.10-pre1. The only difference between 5.02-pre3 and 5.10-pre1 is the merge of the lwip branch (and a single commit to fixup the -DDEBUG=2 build), which warranted a bump in the version minor number. See the shortlog below for details of the differences between

Dear C?dric, If I am using windows version of tinc, how can I check the connection list? Regards, Eric -----Original Message----- From: tinc-bounces at tinc-vpn.org [mailto:tinc-bounces at tinc-vpn.org] On Behalf Of tinc-request at tinc-vpn.org Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 6:00 PM To: tinc at tinc-vpn.org Subject: tinc Digest, Vol 90, Issue 17 Send tinc mailing list submissions to tinc at

Hi all, This is a client side only implementation of reversed dynamic (SOCKS) TCP forwarding, which means it is compatible with any existing servers have 'remote forward' capability. To establish such forward, use "ssh -R [BIND_ADDRESS:]PORT ...". The server will listen on that port and address and accept SOCKS traffics. Hope this will be useful for you. There was an

if I: ssh -fND localhost:6000 somebody at 192.168.56.5 -p PORTNUMBER from computer "A" to computer "B" [B = 192.168.56.5] then I can set the SOCKS proxy for e.g.: Firefox to use "localhost:6000" on computer "A". Ok. I can surf the web through "B". But: - Can anyone sniff the traffic of "A"? [e.g.: computers on same subnet as

I have a few patches for AIX. The patchfile is attached below. The patch has been tested on AIX4.2 and AIX4.3. The patch is on openssh-1.2.1pre25, with openssl-0.94, using RSAref. 1) authenticate support - this function allows the system to determine authentification. Whatever the system allows for login, authenticate will too. It doesn't matter whether it is AFS, DFS, SecureID, local.