similar to: Unable to get IP address from DHCP on remote end.

Hi all, I have finally got tinc working, but it?s only between server/client. Client can receive broadcast packets from server ethernet, and pings between them is fine. If I ping tinc client(192.168.88.166) from any machine in my server lan, 192.168.88.0/24, all packets timed out, and nothing received by the client. Any ideas? Thanks! Regards, Quan Zhou +------------------------+ |pub

Hi. I have several Linux machines running the Debian unstable distribution. Until recently I used rsync version 2.4.6 without any problems, but after upgrading to version 2.5.1 (using apt-get) rsync fails. The command that produces the error is run on oldmill (128.135.72.4): rsync -av --password-file=/etc/rsyncd.pw armada::rsync /backup/armada/home/ And the error is: @ERROR: access denied to

Is there a way to get rid of all the routes in a routing table ? This is more or less what I do: route add 146.64.80.0/24 192.168.0.100 route add 146.141.0.0 -interface tun1 route add 146.182.0.0 -interface tun1 route add 146.230.0.0 -interface tun1 netstat -rn inet 146.64.80.0/24 192.168.0.100 UGS 0 0 sis0 146.141.0.0/16 tun1 US 0

Will this (in theory) work, or have I been around too much magic smoke that has escaped from fried equipment??? I have a system with two different internet connections. One connection is a WISP via an external bridging radio (ethernet to proprietary wireless back haul). The other connection is PPPoE ADSL via the local phone company. (I think) I am wanting to use equal cost multi path

Hi, I'm trying a VPN via ssh between Linux (Suse 10.3, 5.0) and OpenBSD (4.2, 4.7). But it doesn't work... On Linux: sudo ssh -v -f -w 0:1 $OPENBSD true sudo /sbin/ifconfig tun0 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.2 sudo /sbin/route add -net 192.168.17.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev tun0 On OBSD: sudo ifconfig tun1 10.1.1.2 10.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 sudo /sbin/route add 10.0.3.0/24 10.1.1.1 And add a

Hi! Can I create the unnumbered GRE tunnel with iproute2 utility? Can someone provide me a link/howto/example_config how to do it? The topology is one tunnel between two linux boxes: -- eth1-|__|-eth0 <-------------> eth0-|__|-eth1 -- I''m trying now with: ip tu add tun1 mode gre local loc.IP remote rem.IP ttl 255 dev eth0 ip addr add tun1 0.0.0.0 ip link set tun1 up but it

[192.168.0.0/24 Lan] v [Shorewall box ''Curtain'', 192.168.0.254, DHCP to ISP, and a OpenVPN tunnel 10.4.0.2] v [Internet] v [Shorewall box ''statler'' 130.241.25.165, and an OpenVPN tunnel 10.4.0.1] Now, i have set a rule on statler ACCEPT vpn $FW tcp smtp and i have as below. root@statler:/etc/shorewall# cat zones | grep -v ^# net Net Internet

If an ssh server receives a tun/tap tunnel request and sets up the tunnel concerned, as far as I can see there is currently no way for the server to configure the tunnel in a manner dependent upon (e.g) the key used to set up the ssh session. Whilst an id based on the key can be passed to the ssh child process, where the tunnel is dynamically allocated, its tunnel name is lost. This patch

Hi all, I have succesfully joined together three LANs using OpenVPN over Linux (Debian) gateways at the 'exit' of each one of these LANs. The VPN seems to be OK, as I can ping network hosts from one LAN to another using their private IP addresses with no problem at all. However network browsing through the VPN is not working. The network diagram for my setup is at

I have a setup with two Internet providers. One circuit (net0 == eth1) is used primarily for employees and tunnels to other sites. The other (net1 == eth2) is for the production machines that customers access. Everythung works in teh sense that packets get to where they are sent (mostly) but I recently I had a sniffer on the system and noticed a problem I cannot solve. traffic coming in

Hi everybody, I want to do the following setup : | | Tun1 - Link 1 | Tun1 | | Router A | teql | INTERNET Link - | | teql |router B | | Tun2 - Link 2 | Tun2 | | This should permit to agregate Link 1 and Link 2 (less the cost of the encapsulation). The two tunnels are GRE ip tunnel. It seems to work fine

Hi, I don't know, if this is a developer question, but it is too strange for the user list and maybe a possible bug. My setup is a little bit complicated, but I will try to explain as simple as possible. I've got 3 server: All Server: System: Debian 6 Interfaces on server1: eth0 tun0 tun1 $ ssh -v OpenSSH_5.5p1 Debian-6+squeeze1, OpenSSL 0.9.8o 01 Jun 2010 Server 1 is for connecting

Hi, i've got this problem with my jail and i'm abolutly lost as in the why of it. I previously posted this on comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc but i was advised to send here I was unable to find help on google :( To resume quick, when i'm in a jail, netstat doesn't work properly. Hopefully i have provided sufficient information for anyone willing to help me :p First of all, my system :

Dear list, I am having a problem with openvpn. I have the following arrangement, running two instances of openvpn on "home fw". I want to protect my WLAN in back of the home fw and that works fine. I can see "Peer connection initiated with 192.168.1.3:5000" in daemon.log on homefw. Nothing gets initiated with officefw, nor can I ping the other end of the tunnel at officefw.

Hi, I''m running a Debian 2.2r2 on a university server with 3 public ip on one ethernet card (but soon we will have three cards). There''s a tunnel (implemented with vtund on a tun interface with local address 192.168.1.10 and remote 192.168.1.20) from this server to another server without public ip and behind a router. I wanted to make the second server visible to the world, so

Hi, [Summary] There seems to be a bug when using the "+" wildcard notation in the interfaces file, in that rules are not generated in the fwd chain to permit traffic going out an interface with a "+" in it. [Details] The interface entries: loc tun0 detect routeback,newnotsyn loc tun1 detect routeback,newnotsyn loc tun2

Hi, this reminds me of my troubles of setting up samba BDC at remote company branch. Connection was done by IPSEC tunnel between 2 mikrotik routers. Thing was, ipsec supports only unicast, but not multicast,nor broadcast. Solved it by adding L2TP tunnel that support the above mentioned mechanisms. So ended up with the l2tp (which has very weak encryption and is very old and vulnerable)

Excuse me form reposting the quesiton, but I didn''t find any solution. Any suggestion is welcome Hi, I''m running a Debian 2.2r2 on a university server with 3 public ip o(1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2 and 3.3.3.3 on one ethernet card (but soon we will have three cards). There''s a tunnel (implemented with vtund on a tun interface with local address 192.168.1.10 and remote

Hi folks, I have three network cards on my Slackware box and eth0 and eth1 are for two Internet connections. They have imq0 and imq1. All traffic shaping works fine. Internal eth2 does no traffic shaping. But recently I have put two OpenVPN tunnels (tun devices) and both work via eth0. So my question is - how to shape the traffic on these tun0 and tun1 devices? Thanks Remus

I''ll take it from the begining... About one year ago I only had 1 IP and used wondershaper. It worked great. Now I got /27 (32 IPs) and a gw computer that talks to two ISPs via a two tunnels. See: http://www.flashdance.cx/pics/flashdance-LAN.png I _really_ have a need to do QoS on my connection, for example I host websites that uses all available upstream. When I download at the same