similar to: Configuration advice on a single interface server

Sorry, Guus I know how to bridge an internal adapter to a tap device. My problem is that this box only has one physical interface. Internet ----->[Cisco router]------------[network switch]--------{PCs, Linux VPN server} A typical server bridge setup is for the LAN side of the adapter to be bridged to the tap, and the external client connecting to its external adapter be serviced by the vpn

Hi, I am trying to set up a VPN that allows mobile users to access multcast information from an information vendor. Hence Tinc is configured as a switch. Internet --[ router1 ]------[eth0 VPN eth1]--------------[ router2 ]--------- mobile users VPN server is running Ubuntu 10.04 and is also configured as a dhcp server that hands out IP address to connecting mobile users. A bridge (br0) is

I have a tinc mesh consisting of 6 Windows servers. All are configured identically and all but one work without any problems. On that one server however the tinc service starts, but the connection does not come up (no packets get routed, ping times out). If I stop and start the service manually, the connection is up in like half a second. If I start tinc on the command line, it works every time.

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:38:24AM +0800, Terry T wrote: > Is it possible to configure a bridge mode VPN with only a single physical > interface eth0. The scenario is that the proposed tinc server is assigned a > static 10.10.145.254/24 that is connected to a Cisco router. Incoming > traffic can be set up to be forwarded to this server. An example of how to set up tinc with a bridge

Gus: I guess my primary point of confusion is that the non-vpn LAN ip addresses are duplicated in each cluster. So within a cluster, the LAN addresses are unique. But when you look at 2 clusters, 2 different servers share the 10.99.0.11 address. So that is why I created a VPN for inside the cluster on the LAN interfaces using the private 10.0.1.xx range. THen, I created a separate VPN on the

yes, ip_forward was turned on. iptables is defaulted to ACCEPT policy on all the 3 chains. On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 1:24 AM, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 12:06:51AM +0800, Terry T wrote: > > > I have a Debian 8 64-bit machine set up as a server and apt-got the tinc > > package. I configured tinc as a bridge and everything seems

Hi, if we are to configure Tinc just like a traditional server-client VPN, what would be the options to set in the configuration file to achieve that. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20160501/b5d5935f/attachment.html>

thanks, but i was able to make it work based on some suggestion on tomato shibby forums. Regards Ramesh On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 06:53:07PM +0000, Guillermo Bisheimer wrote: > > > I've setup a Tinc VPN for a bunch of nodes divided in two groups: > > > > Group 1: > > IP Range

Hi, I have macosx 10.5.8 and Tunnelblick (openvpn) installed before. I have installed tinc using port and got version 1.0.11 (Jun 29 2010 15:10:51) now I have 2 problems: 1) the interface variable from the tinc.conf is not used, instead I have a tun0 interface (or tap0). 2) the tinc-up script seems to be fired too early as I get an error: ifconfig: interface /dev/tap0 does not exist when I run

Hi Tinc group, I have recently got an adsl connection at home, which only provides a single static ip address. I want to set up a tinc vpn from home to my workplace. I am trying to decide what hardware I need to do the above. At the moment, I am aware that I could use an Alcatel Speedtouch USB modem directly connected to a Linux vpn box at my home. ( Wall socket---adsl cable---Speedtouch---usb

Hello, At FOSDEM 2010 (http://fosdem.org/2010/), I will give a lightning talk titled "tinc: the difficulties of a peer-to-peer VPN on the hostile Internet". The talk will probably be on Saturday 7th of Februari at 15:20 CET, but this might still change. If you would like to meet at FOSDEM with me or other persons using or developing tinc, just reply to this email. The abstract of the

Hello, At FOSDEM 2010 (http://fosdem.org/2010/), I will give a lightning talk titled "tinc: the difficulties of a peer-to-peer VPN on the hostile Internet". The talk will probably be on Saturday 7th of Februari at 15:20 CET, but this might still change. If you would like to meet at FOSDEM with me or other persons using or developing tinc, just reply to this email. The abstract of the

Hi to all. I've setup a Tinc VPN for a bunch of nodes divided in two groups: Group 1: IP Range 10.100.0.2 to 10.100.127.255 Group 2: IP Range 10.100.128.1 to 10.100.255.255 Server IP: 10.100.0.1 Every client connects only to the server. In the server I have the following tinc.conf: Name = server AddressFamily = ipv4 Interface = tun0 TunnelServer = yes Forwarding = kernel ListenAddress =

Hi, All Recently, one of my tinc client always suffer connection drop, I was suspect the connection was not stable to cause this issue, and BTW, I’ve set the PingTimeout to 10 seconds already, but this situation still happens a lot sometimes, but when the connection drop happens, the connection recovery pretty fast, normally in a minutes. In order to deep dive into the cause, or proven the

Hi everyone again. I run tinc with the following command: /usr/sbin/tincd -d1 --logfile=/var/log/tinc.log That creates the file "/var/log/tinc.log" correctly and reports into it. Well, because I want to have a log file by day, I have created a logrotate file (/etc/logrotate.d/tinc) that contains the following lines: ----------------------------------------- /var/log/tinc.log {

Since Fedora is pushing NSS SSL instead of OpenSSL, has someone tested tinc-vpn against NSS? As i recall, a single machine can not have OpenSSL and mod_nss installed at the same time anymore. So if you have apache running, you _may_ have problems running tinc? The nss api is supposed to mostly similar to openssl api, but there are some things openssl supports and somethings nss supports. Is

Dear all, we have a very strange problem, - we have 3 VPN endpoints - all are in one NETWORK - all daemons come up and connect without any problem and normally we have no problem working through the VPN but in some cases the connection does not work because the traffic leaves the TAP interface on one VPN endpoint but never arrives on the other end, the similarities between the packages seem to

I mean exactly the same configuration, including the pub-pri key. Sent from iPhone

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 I'm trying to make a VPN network with the help of my friends. Tinc seems to support multiple connect to options, but isn't it tricky? Will it cause unsynchronized hosts etc? Will the 1.1 invite support it? PS: every nodes are not 24/7 on, maybe a node will be online but another not. - -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]