similar to: linking non-neighboring networks together?

I am currently running dovecot 2.0.9 on a CentOS 6 server with the following layout for mailboxes: mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir I would like to change the layout to this format to match the output of other software packages such as offlineimap, mbsync, etc: mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir:LAYOUT=fs:INBOX=~/Maildir/INBOX Is there a way to convert the mailbox layout for all mail accounts

Hello, For my tests at home, I want configure a Samba server on a PC to allow others PCs clients to access to a share disk without login/password. >From XP home, I can access by network neighboring and by mounting a network drive, but from XP Pro, I can only mount a network drive. The network neighboring don't work with XP pro. Why ? Here contents my smb.conf file used :

Hello I have 2 class-B networks (172.22.0.0/16 and 172.23.0.0/16, over 130k of ip''s) and need to setup traffic tbf shapers with 64kb/s for each ip from 172.22.0.0/16 and 128kb/s for each ip from 172.23.0.0/16 just read lartc and don''t understand how to use u32 for decreasing number of rules and hashing

Hello, For my tests at home, I want configure a Samba server on a PC to allow others PCs clients to access to a share disk without login/password. >From XP home, I can access by network neighboring and by mounting a network drive, but from XP Pro, I can only mount a network drive. The network neighboring don't work with XP pro. Why ? Here contents my smb.conf file used :

Hi, I have a shorewall v4.0.7 installation on an older version of fedora. What is the proper way to add another network to the DMZ interface? Is it through virtual networks? If so, how is that done, given I''ve already designed the system around a single network on the DMZ? I have two physical interfaces on the firewall, with eth0 for external (192.168.1.0) and eth1 for the DMZ

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1434 Bug ID: 1434 Summary: Usability improvements, enabling creation of complex firewalls Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft

I have two interfaces on a centos machine with IPs 192.168.2.15 and 192.168.3.15. The routing table is: # route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.3.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 192.168.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 169.254.0.0 *

Hi, I have one firewall with 3 ethernet cards, 2 internet links, one cisco 2920 and one problem in RTNETLINK ;o) Let me explain my network : | *** Internet Link 1 *** *** Internet Link 2 *** 10.1.0.1| Serial Serial | 10.2.0.1 |||| +--------------+ +------------+

Hi all, I have a similar question like many asked before I know but Please help as i cant figure out where the problem is and how should I tackle. I have 2 ISP connections. I want to share the bandwidth from both. I have copied the script from many places and created my own after changes. Problem is that only one connection is utilized at a time. Not both working. ratio of consuming

Dear list, I''m running Shorewall on a dedicated Fedora 7 box. Shorewall is working well as an office DSL router (dynamic IP) with loc and dmz zones. I am now trying to configure IPSec to connect a VPS, "casp", with a static IP to both the firewall and to the loc network behind it. The host to host SA works fine. However, pings from "loc" to "casp" can be

Hello, I'm trying to make browsing work over several routed subnets, but obviously, something goes wrong. Here's the situation : !-----------! ! hgsserver ! (SAMBA HOST) !-----------! | | | |192.168.2.0/24 !----------! 192.168.3.0/24 |-----------------! wifigate !------------- - - - | !----------! (several wireless WinXP boxes)

Hi, Some LLVM classes (e.g. ReturnInst) have explicit constructors with at least two parameters (with no default arguments). Why is that? E.g. what are they trying to prevent? -- Gaby -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150314/4d4cc6cc/attachment.html>

Hi - I have shorewall-1.3.8-1 on a RH 7.3 machine that acts as a firewall for my network. It was running the other day just fine, but today I have problems getting to the firewall. It is a frame-relay network with Cisco routers. Everything is 192.168.x.x / 24. I can''t ping the firewall from the WAN, but can from the main LAN. Sounds like a routing issue to me, but it was working for

Hi all, first time that i tried to use xen. My goal is to reach in ssh all the domUs after i manage to get a connection through openvpn. Like they were real servers. I installed the openvpn server on my dom0 (ubuntu 9.04 + default package + latest debian-xen-amd64 kernel) After connecting to the openvpn server I''m able to do direct ssh just to the dom0. For reaching domU i had do it with

Hi All, I am trying to setup the site-to-site VPN with TINC for connect my home network to company network. Here is the IP allocation and configuration for your reference. Home PC (192.168.1.2) ?-----? Home (OPENWRT Router, 192.168.1.1, 10.0.0.1) ?----------------? INTERNET ?-------------? COMPANY (Windows 7 PC,192.168.2.1, 10.0.0.2) ?------------? COMPANY (SERVER ZONE) ?----? SERVER A

Hello, I am trying to set up a PVM (a the moment Ubuntu as guest and Ubuntu server as Dom0). The main issue is that the DomUs can''t get direct net access, because the access is restricted by a DHCP server that also functions as proxy to the outside of the network. The server controls the MAC address and only http is allowed as outgoing connection. So the domUs shouldn''t appear

Hello, I''m trying to setup an 8 port wan configuration (pptp+pppoe) with one vlan trunk. My internal networks are : LAN(eth9): 10.0.0.0/16 VLAN10(eth9) 10.10.0.0/24 VLAN20(eth9) 10.20.0.0/24 VLAN30(eth9) 10.30.0.0/24 VLAN100(eth9) 10.100.0.0/24 I would like to post my configuration here since i don''t success to do the following: 1. Communicate between VLANxx to LAN