similar to: tinc 1.1 never seems to accept UDP packets from 1.0.24 hosts

Hi all, I have two nodes, connected to a switch, using Tinc 1.1 from git. They connect each other with sptps, and to other nodes in the Internet with old protocol because they have Tinc 1.0. There is no problem with remote nodes, but between my 2 local nodes, they see 1518 PMTU. But local network is 1500 MTU !!! So nodes can ping each other but larger data does not go. test1=sllm1 test2=sllm2

Hi guys, thanks in advance for any answers. Trying to get tinc up and running, I hit a roadblock though. What I’m trying to do is to connect to my roaming notebook to my company network. All hosts on our network live in the 10.42.x.x range, netmask is 255.255.0.0. Tinc 1.1pre14 service is running on a Windows host 10.42.2.50. Public ports are natted through, telnetting public ip port 655 the

Hi all, I'm back again with my speed issues. The past issues where dependant of network I used. Now I run my tests in a lab, with 2 configurations linked by a Gigabit switch : node1: Intel Core i5-2400 with Debian 7.2 node2: Intel Core i5-3570 with Debian 7.2 Both have AES and PCLMULQDQ announced in /proc/cpuinfo. I use Tinc 1.1 from Git. When I run an iperf test from node2 (client) to

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:28:23PM +0200, Sven-Haegar Koch wrote: > I have a couple of tinc hosts in the same network, some using the latest > tinc 1.1 git and some using 1.0.24. > > It seems like traffic between 1.1 and 1.0 nodes is always transfered > using TCP (and an intermediate node, if not directly connected), never > with UDP. [...] > # tinc log 5 | grep 2.3.4.5

Hallo, Another strange and difficult to understand thing - seems like all the easy bugs in 1.1 are gone ;) waehring (1.1) | +-------------------+--------------+ | | | vpnhub1 (1.1) igor (1.1) turing (1.0) | | | +-------------------+--------------+ | tokamak Whenever another node outside of the graph connects to vpnhub or igor

Hi, I propose that the "ad-hoc connections" (localdiscovery) are also displayed in the graph (graphdumpfile) as it is useful for debugging. I find the command-line tooling a bit cumbersome to find out where the problem is - maybe a web-interface can be added to tincd? Implementing a http server is trivial I found out. Folkert van Heusden -- Curious about the inner workings of your

On Fri, 15 May 2015, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:26:46PM +0200, Sven-Haegar Koch wrote: > > > Another strange and difficult to understand thing - seems like all the > > easy bugs in 1.1 are gone ;) > [...] > > Got ADD_EDGE from aaa_vpnhub1 (1.2.3.4 port 443) for haegar_tokamak > > -> igor which does not match existing entry (Local

Hello. I found that anonymous structures does not work on gcc-2.95. If you guys want to support a bit older platforms I suggest fixing it. You can check out patch I created to fix this issue. I just added 2 extra structures to remove anonymous structs inside connection_status_t and node_status_t. Patch is here: ftp://borg.uu3.net/pub/unix/tinc/tinc.patch Attaching it as well. Regards, Borg

On Sat, 16 May 2015, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 12:09:52AM +0200, Sven-Haegar Koch wrote: > > > This change is not so good: > > > > Connection with aaa_vpnhub1 (1.2.3.4 port 443) activated > > Error while translating addresses: ai_family not supported > > > > (And then the tinc process exists) > > Hm, I couldn't reproduce

Hi everybody. Is there a way to have a list of reacheable partners and its connection status? I need to list all partners in any tinc instance, its status (connected / disconnected) and connection method (direct, relayed thru other partner, etc.) Thanks! -- *Ing. Guillermo Bisheimer* *B&S Sistemas de Control y Equipamientos* Av. de los Constituyentes 1172 (E3116CIX) Crespo, Entre Ríos

On Tue, 5 May 2020 13:32:50 +0100 Jonathan Plews <SRS0=286U=6T=yahoo.co.uk=pl3w5y at mijnuvt.nl> wrote: > I didn't study the internals but maybe changing DirectOnly, Forwarding > and IndirectData will have an impact on per packet performance and > speed stability by disabling some of the meshing features? I will definitely try those. > Although it probably just hit the CPU

Hi - Thanks to Sven-Haegar and Donald, but still having issues setting up with Windows. Machine1 can't ping the VPN address of machine2. Regular IPv4 address for both machines in 192.168.1.xxx range. Router: Forwarding port 655 to 101.102.103.1, UDP and TCP Forwarding port 656 to 101.102.103.2, UDP and TCP Tinc.conf on machine user1 just three lines: Name = vpnuser1 ConnectTo =

Hi all, As title, is that possible to develop a python version of tinc, that will be interesting:) Tks. Cong -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc-devel/attachments/20161213/fcd83914/attachment.html>

------- TL;DR ------- Performance seems slow (around 300-400Mbit peak). How to improve? ------- The Long Version ------- I tried to test tinc performance for an upcoming project that may need to use NFS over a VPN. Our current tinc network seems to be able to transmit at around 30-40 MB/s. (I used an 1GB random testfile to copy to/from /dev/shm/; using netcat and http.) In comparison, HTTP and

On Mon, 4 May 2020 18:45:19 +0200 (CEST) Sven-Haegar Koch <haegar at sdinet.de> wrote: > On Mon, 4 May 2020, Pallinger Péter wrote: > > > ------- TL;DR ------- > > > > Performance seems slow (around 300-400Mbit peak). > > How to improve? > > Not sure if that could be the case for you, my links are not that > fast: > > Make sure to disable

Hallo, trying to compile the current 1.1 git snapshot under Debian Wheezy gives me: configure.ac:7: option `info-in-builddir' not recognized autoreconf: automake failed with exit status: 1 Do I now need a specific newer version of automake? Seems to be the result of commit 13f9bc1ff199bea46 "Add support for out-of-tree ("VPATH") builds." Undoing the change to

Hi Sven, 2008/1/25, Sven Koch <haegar at sdinet.de>: > Package: nut > Version: 2.2.1-1 > Severity: normal > > I am using a Mustec PowerMust 1000 USB, connected with a USB cable to > the PC. > > With nut 2.2.0-2.1 everything works without problems - but since the > 2.2.1-1 update the "upsdrvctl start" from the init script just fails, > executing the

I'm writing a storage app for storing the Ed25519 pub keys and want to do some basic verification when a user submits their public key. Is it just A-Za-z0-9 ? or can it contain special chars as well? I'm assuming it will be in the range of printable characters? Martin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20316 Summary: modesetting freeze pc Product: xorg Version: git Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: high Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy:

Hi, I have an DNAT ISSUE with PREROUTING. This is my setup. I have 2 firewalls running iptables. Pls asume 1.2.3.4/29 is the internet interace of FIRST firewall. 2.3.4.5/29 is the internet interface of SECOND firewall. it has DMZ zone. in that DMZ zone, mail server runnig @ 192.168.100.3 Now I want to DNAT port 25 of FISRT firewall ( i.e - its ip address - 1.2.3.4/29) to the internet ip