similar to: [RFC] [PATCH] Mode=Switch: add per-VLAN forwarding database

On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 12:31:20PM +0100, Michael Braun wrote: > I'm inter-connecting AccessPoints using a tinc mesh and have bridge-nodes to bridge this vpn into some existing backbone. > The AccessPoints bridge their users into 802.1q VLANs (per WiFi-Client, there can be multiple VLANs active on each AP) in the tinc mesh, and the bridge nodes bridge some vlans into the backbone. >

Hi, thanks for the feedback. > This is an interesting problem. I wonder how you would solve it if you > would have a real (managed) switch instead of tinc to connect the > access points and bridge nodes together? in the backbone we have HP ProCurve switches and all of them (except for the oldest series from more than 10 years ago) separate their forwarding database per vlan. HP calls

Hi folks. This message may be a bit verbose and not as techie as the ones I''ve seen in this list, but describing the scenario will save a lot of messages. Scenario: A building with 17 floors, each floor with 24 offices (totals 408 offices) connected to the backbone through a border switch (1 vlan for each office). The offices can lease bandwidth of 64k, 128k, 256k, 512k, 1M and 2Mbps,

On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 09:49:59AM +0100, M. Braun wrote: > > This is an interesting problem. I wonder how you would solve it if you > > would have a real (managed) switch instead of tinc to connect the > > access points and bridge nodes together? > > in the backbone we have HP ProCurve switches and all of them (except for > the oldest series from more than 10 years

As the issue concerns both the -user (configuration) and -devel (OOPS), I''m sending this message to both lists. Some time ago I complained about two problems: - VLANs are not working on machines with 100 Mbit cards - I get a kernel Oops (sometimes panic) when I try to use bonding and VLANs with Xen The root of the issue is the same in both cases: VLAN interfaces must *not* be

As the issue concerns both the -user (configuration) and -devel (OOPS), I''m sending this message to both lists. Some time ago I complained about two problems: - VLANs are not working on machines with 100 Mbit cards - I get a kernel Oops (sometimes panic) when I try to use bonding and VLANs with Xen The root of the issue is the same in both cases: VLAN interfaces must *not* be

OK, thanks again for all your help. I have resolved this, finally. The problem was that I configured VLAN 48 as the native VLAN on the trunk port.That was a mistake as apparently the native VLAN is the one where Cisco does not bother to tag packets. For now I set the native VLAN to VLAN 1 and that works. Cheers, Boris. On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Boris Epstein <borepstein at

Hello, I'm looking for any information on setting up VLANs to seperate the telephony network from the ordinary network. I have google'd around but haven't found a lot of information in the best way to go about this. Has anyone managed to do this successfully in conjunction with asterisks? If so, could they provide an overview of what they did and how they find it? Did the performance

Hi, I have a 64bit Debian Lenny server with two physical network interfaces, one is connected to a switch without VLANs (eth0), the other (eth1) is connected to a switch with tagged VLANs (eth1). I''m running a couple of paravirtualized VMs that have no problem using the eth0 interface (bridged). I''m also running a couple of fully virtualized VMs, one being a Linux box (with a

Hello, I use a script network-multi vlan and network-bridge-vlan for multiple VLANs in domu. Several domu uses the bridge vlanbr30. Need to dom0 as was in this vlan''e. How? I tried to put a bridge interface ip, but with him until the rest domu in vlanbr30 not get through. How to understand the need to create a virtual interface (vifx.y) and add it to the bridge vlanbr30. How?

I am running KVM guests under Redhat 6. I tried to setup a bridge device to an interface with a vlan trunk connected to a Juniper switch. On the KVM host, I am able to define vlans and access them via the vlan trunk. I was not able to access a vlan from the kvm guest connected to the bridged interface. I believe this would be what is commonly called QinQ or 802.1ad. Is this possible to do? I

I've searched around but haven't found a definitive answer yet, is it possible to kickstart from a tagged VLAN? I found this bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431915 But I can't find out how far the vlan support goes. I haven't found anything about it in any kickstart docs. I have two tagged vlans: Vlan 100 - server subnet Vlan 101 - backup subnet From

Do you need the whole configuration? On the switch end, we have the relevant VLAN (VLAN 48) with the assigned IP address of 192.168.48.101 and the range of ports (Gi1/0/1 - Gi1/0/8) assigned to that VLAN. Seems - and acts - like a legitimate setup and works fine, except for this particular instance. Thanks. Boris. On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < dennisml at

I am running CentOS 5.3 x86_64 as my dom0 and CentOS 5.3 on my domU's. On the dom0, I have two interfaces that are bonded and have tagged VLANs. I can get the networks to the domU's by creating a bridge for each of the VLANS (bond0.3, bond0.4, etc). On the domU, the interfaces show up as eth0, eth1, etc. Is there a way to set up the network on the dom0 so my domU's see a single

Hi there, can anyone point me to the docs needed to support Tagged Vlans through Shorewall. I might just be blind or my understanding of Tagged Vlans isn''t good enough yet to find it. Axel

Hello, I am creating a configuration where a Redhat server running bridge-tools 0.9.5 will be bridging between different VLANs on the same physical interface (for example: a bridge consisting of eth1.100 and eth1.110). This physical interface is being connected to modern Cisco switches running PVST+. The Cisco switch does not like this configuration as the tags on its BPDUs are being changed

Steve, Thanks, makes sense. I just don't see why I have to effectively waste an extra IP address to get my connection established. Boris. On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Stephen Harris <lists at spuddy.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 07:10:57PM -0500, Boris Epstein wrote: > > > This makes two of us. I've done everything as you have described and it > >

Hello, can anybody help me how to configure vlans? There are vlans: vlan2 vlan3 vlan30 Server has one nic - eth0. vlan2 should be dom0 eth0(peth0) for management Each vlan3 and vlan30 should be has its own bridge. How to make it? Br Peter _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

hi everyone, I'm trying to get vlans tagged in libvirt as my switch's end (yes traffic will be leaving the host and into network switches) allows only tagged vlans. But with network as such: ...   <portgroup name='vlan-55'>     <vlan trunk='yes'>       <tag id='55'/>     </vlan>   </portgroup> </network> and guest as:    

I'm planning to set up a libvirt/kvm system using a card with SR-IOV support. I'd like to use the vf pool option rather than statically assigning a vf to each vm. However, I'd also like each vm to have a static MAC address and I have multiple VLANs they will be on. I found in the documentation a syntax for specifying a MAC and a vlan when the vf is statically assigned, but I don't