similar to: Sieve filter script EXECUTION FAILED

On 30 Oct 2020, at 11:25, Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd at petrovitsch.priv.at> wrote: > On 30/10/2020 17:11, @lbutlr wrote: > [...] >> echo $1 | sed -e '|</head>|<style>* {color:white !important; background-color: black !important; } </style></head>|' > > What should the sed stuff do? Changes </head> to <style>* {color:white

So, I have the sieve working up to the point that it calls the script, and the script is called (I get different errors if the script is not there, for example). filter action execute program `darkmode.sh' [[EXECUTION ABORTED]] There's no other error logged (for example, when I had sieve_filter_bin_dir miss-set, I would get: sieve: action filter: failed to execute program

On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 03:58:53AM +0100, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: > On 02/12/2018 03:05, Michael A. Peters wrote: > [...] > > But - I would wager that over 95% of the time when someone hits the > > reply button on a list post, their intent is to reply to the list. > > Even if it's 99%: What is the lesser risk if someone get's it wrong? > > Apart from the

On 30 Oct 2020, at 12:34, @lbutlr <kremels at kreme.com> wrote: > I am not sure about the $1. I think filter just pipes the message (or part of the message. > > I will see what happens without the echo I suppose. > > Nope, still the same. > > 32: starting `:contains' match with `i;ascii-casemap' comparator: > 32: matching value `<!DOCTYPE

On 12/01/2018 05:49 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote: > * Michael A. Peters: > >> Netiquette posts are just someone's opinion, and they often don't take >> into account the vastly different way different types of minds work. > > Mailing list netiquette has been around for decades, for good reasons. > If Joe User's mind "works differently", Joe needs to

Hi all! On 11/12/2019 19:16, Benny Pedersen via dovecot wrote: > Atomia via dovecot skrev den 2019-12-11 17:37: [...] > wonderfull example on why mailman sooks on change sender from :// Reply-to munging is considered harmful - please fix that. And thunderbird shows in the "From", "Recipient", "Correspondents" and "Sender[@]" column only "dovecot

I am a newbie to dovecot but not postfix and centos I created a new VM with Centos 8 and installed dovecot and postfix.? Postfix is working fine but dovecot rejects connections from anything but the local machine. Locally ? Trying 10.10.100.157... ? Connected to 10.10.100.157. ? Escape character is '^]'. ? * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE

Hi Claudio Corvino via dovecot, We have received your request and a ticket has been created with Ticket ID - 22073. A support representative will be reviewing your request and will contact you shortly. To view the status of the ticket or add comments, please visit? https://support.atomia.com/helpdesk/tickets/22073 Speak to you soon, Atomia Support Team

This is probably quite an easy question, but I haven't been able to find the answer. I'm running a server where all the email addresses are in the format "user at domain.com". I've noticed that a large number of fake login attempts use the format "user" eg. reception, service, root, admin. Is it possible to prevent any such logins to these email users without an

Hi, This might be a silly question: which would be the best inode ratio for a 5 Tb filesystem dedicated to Maildir++ storage? I use ubuntu server, which has a preconfigured setting for mkfs.ext4 called "news" with inode_ratio = 4096, and after formating the fs with that setting and then with the defautl setting I see this difference of space (wasted space, but more inodes): 4328633696

On 02/12/2018 11:00, Hendrik Boom wrote: > There's an extensive email etiquette post somewhere on the net > explaining why setting 'reply-to' to the list is a bad idea. Lots of posts around about this, all self serving :) There may of course be an RFC floating around, but I admit to never having bothered to look, because good netizens reply to list, lists are public, they

On Fri, 2020-10-30 at 12:21 -0600, @lbutlr wrote: > On 30 Oct 2020, at 11:25, Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd at petrovitsch.priv.at> wrote: > > On 30/10/2020 17:11, @lbutlr wrote: > > [...] > > > echo $1 | sed -e '|</head>|<style>* {color:white !important; background-color: black !important; } </style></head>|' > > > > What

> I want to have it case-insensitive again, like in Pigeonhole version 0.4.24 i would also plea for making it case-insensitive again! We were hit by this too, and I never saw any mail system in which the local Part ist Case sensitive! Sincerly, Klaus Steinberger -- Rechnerbetriebsgruppe / IT, Fakult?t f?r Physik Klaus Steinberger FAX: +49 89 28914280 Tel: +49 89 28914287 --------------

Am 2015-04-02 um 17:49 schrieb Reindl Harald: > Am 02.04.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Edwardo Garcia: >> On 4/1/15, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: >>> Am 01.04.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch: >>>> On Mit, 2015-04-01 at 13:07 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>>> Am 01.04.2015 um 13:04 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch: >>>>>

On 4/1/15, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > > Am 01.04.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch: >> On Mit, 2015-04-01 at 13:07 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> Am 01.04.2015 um 13:04 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch: >>>> IMHO the larger the corporation is, the less are the chances for >>>> *long-term* benefits of the OSS/free

I have recently been working/testing with exchange 2016 and started thinking if I should even migrate to this platform. I assume more people here have experience with exchange and this idea. I was wondering if this is possible with a dovecot setup 1. public folder can be implemented with a public mailbox? 2. authorize users via groups access to mailboxes/folders of the public

you wouldnt know, your not a developer, shit processor maybe, but not a developer On 4/3/15, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > > Am 02.04.2015 um 18:19 schrieb Jogi Hofm?ller: >> Am 2015-04-02 um 17:49 schrieb Reindl Harald: >>> Am 02.04.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Edwardo Garcia: >>>> On 4/1/15, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at

Am 2015-04-02 um 18:24 schrieb Reindl Harald: > Am 02.04.2015 um 18:19 schrieb Jogi Hofm?ller: >> Am 2015-04-02 um 17:49 schrieb Reindl Harald: >>> Am 02.04.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Edwardo Garcia: >>>> On 4/1/15, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: >>>>> Am 01.04.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch: >>>>>> On Mit,

On Mit, 2015-04-01 at 13:07 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 01.04.2015 um 13:04 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch: > > IMHO the larger the corporation is, the less are the chances for > > *long-term* benefits of the OSS/free software (mainly because: usually > > commercial success is driven and defined from marketing to sales[1] sown > > to the techies which are forced into

* Ruben Safir: > On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 03:58:53AM +0100, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: > >> Let's hope that people who do not know how to use a tool - e.g. >> like a hammer - doesn't use that tool in the first place .... > > that is pretty unrealistic and I don't agree with it anyway. The tool metaphor is realistic. In my experience (which dates back to the