similar to: implementing folder hashing

Thank you for your reply. One questionthough, if you add a mount point how do you know what user to move ? On 9/23/20 7:35 PM, Manuel Delgado wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > It depends much on your site configuration. > > In our case, we have several mount points and we distribute our user > mailboxes using username hash (%N)[1] and limit this hash to the > number of mount

Hi Adrian, It depends much on your site configuration. In our case, we have several mount points and we distribute our user mailboxes using username hash (%N)[1] and limit this hash to the number of mount points. We preferred %N over %H because the distribution of users was much better. Ex. xstore%2.3Nn turns to xstore00, xstore01 and xstore03. Regards Manuel Delgado [1]

I think I don't understand the question. Dovecot knows where the user's home is, you don't need to guess. With mail_home or with Passdb variables you can define the user's home location and you can use 'doveadm user' to show where the home directory is in the filesystem. However, if you are migrating I would use dovecot sync or similar tool instead of doing the manual

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:04:52PM -0500, Stephen Checkoway wrote: > > On Jan 16, 2013, at 10:07 AM, Brad Smith <brad at comstyle.com> wrote: > > > I was wondering if someone with more familiarity with MC > > on X86 could consider looking into adding support for > > the hyphenated versions of the VIA Padlock instructions? > > > Take a look at

On Jan 16, 2013, at 10:07 AM, Brad Smith <brad at comstyle.com> wrote: > I was wondering if someone with more familiarity with MC > on X86 could consider looking into adding support for > the hyphenated versions of the VIA Padlock instructions? Take a look at llvm/lib/Target/X86InstrSystem.td perhaps. -- Stephen Checkoway

I was wondering if someone with more familiarity with MC on X86 could consider looking into adding support for the hyphenated versions of the VIA Padlock instructions? If anyone is up for it there are details within these two bug reports.. http://www.llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8556 http://www.llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10266 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous

Also you should probably use dovecot director to ensure same user sessions end up on same server, as it's not supported to access same user on different backends in this scenario. Aki > On 10/01/2020 19:49 Adrian Minta <adrian.minta at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > you need to "clone" the first server, change the ip address, mount the same

Hello, is it possible to use Last Login Plugin with mysql instead of redis ? http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/LastLogin .-- Best regards, Adrian Minta

Hello, I would like to host my mails and I would like to retrieve my existing mailbox content from my ISP My ISP ====== I don't have root access on the server The server seem to use Dovecot according to the banner. My machine ========== I have root access on the server I use Dovecot 2.2.21 I use Maildir I read this page multiple times but it's not clear to me

Howdy, I'd like an adive on what to use. I have sql users, and i want to have the lastlogin of them, what is the native option for this: * Using last_login plugin which will give me the last login? * Use postlogin for imap and pop3n which will give me besides lastlogin the IP and protocol? Thanks in advanced, -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

On 24.02.2015 20:29, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > don't allow senders which you would not receive mail for - period > Seems interesting, at least until the bots adapt to this. Any idea how could this be implemented ? -- Best regards, Adrian Minta

Hello, about the CVE-2015-0204, in apache the following config seems to disable this vulnerability: SSLProtocol All -SSLv2 -SSLv3 SSLCipherSuite HIGH:MEDIUM:!aNULL:!eNULL:!EXPORT:!CAMELLIA:!DES:!MD5:!PSK:!RC4 Is something similar possible with dovecot ? If yes, what are the implications with old mail clients ? -- Best regards, Adrian Minta

Hi there, (context: I was optimizing Roundcube mailbox list server response, and in that 300-400ms response time, around 170ms is spent on single fgets() call which is waiting IMAP repsonse to "SELECT MyMailbox" command) I straced dovecot and of the whole request/response process, around 30ms is spent for everything else, and overwhelming majority of time (150-170ms) is spent for

On 04.03.2015 18:19, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: > On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 06:13:31PM +0200, Adrian Minta wrote: >> Hello, >> about the CVE-2015-0204, in apache the following config seems to disable >> this vulnerability: >> SSLProtocol All -SSLv2 -SSLv3 >> SSLCipherSuite >> HIGH:MEDIUM:!aNULL:!eNULL:!EXPORT:!CAMELLIA:!DES:!MD5:!PSK:!RC4 >> >> Is

If you just want active/standby, you can simply use corosync/pacemaker as other already suggest and don?t use Director. I have a dovecot HA server that uses floating IP and pacemaker to managed it, and it works quite well. The only real hard part is having a HA storage. You can simply use a NFS storage shared by both servers (as long as only one has the floating IP, you won?t have issue with the

On 24.02.2015 20:40, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 24.02.2015 um 19:37 schrieb Adrian Minta: >> On 24.02.2015 20:29, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>> don't allow senders which you would not receive mail for - period >>> >> Seems interesting, at least until the bots adapt to this. >> Any idea how could this be implemented? > > with the

Hi, Cool howto, and for protocol would this have that option also? From: dovecot <dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Minta via dovecot Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2019 18:37 To: dovecot at dovecot.org Subject: Re: LastLogin update Hi, this seems to work very well: https://docs.iredmail.org/track.user.last.login.html You could also add "rip = $rip" in

Thank you all for the replies.... I have the test environment with the same configuration. But I have been asked to go with same environment for HA/Resilience in Live. Yes, I have only one Live server. It is configured in "Maildir" format. The data stores on a Network / Shared Storage (But definitely not local disk, its a mount point). I have been asked to create a HA/Resilience for

Hello, is it possible to disable indexing on dovecot-lda ? Right now postfix delivers the mail directly to the nfs server without any problems. If I switch to dovecot-lda the system crashes do to the high I/O and locking. Indexing on lda is not very useful because the number of of imap logins is less than 5% that of incoming mails, so an user could wait for 3 sec to get his mail index, but a

Yes, multiple imap servers using one shared nfs storage. With the same config on 2.2.13 the public interface traffic was similar to the storage interface, around 100 mbps. After we switch to 2.2.27 the storage interface traffic jumped 10 times while the public interface stayed the same. This make us thinking that something is wrong and each time a user logs in the whole Inbox content is read