On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 19:00:32 +0100 Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:> so you allow random envelope senders on your servers? > why?I know it is not necessarily a good idea... :) It is basicaly to allow fake home addresses from the office for some managers. Thanks for the smtpd_recipient_restrictions list, it sounds interesting! Luciano. -- /"\ /Via A. Salaino, 7 - 20144 Milano (Italy) \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN / PHONE : +39 2 485781 FAX: +39 2 48578250 X AGAINST HTML MAIL / E-MAIL: posthamster at sublink.sublink.ORG / \ AND POSTINGS / WWW: http://www.lesassaie.IT/
Am 24.02.2015 um 19:20 schrieb Luciano Mannucci:> On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 19:00:32 +0100 > Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > >> so you allow random envelope senders on your servers? >> why? > I know it is not necessarily a good idea... :) > It is basicaly to allow fake home addresses from the office for some > managers.don't allow senders which you would not receive mail for - period especially don't allow fakes - if your machine spews a large amount of mail here not bypass sender-verification because not SPF you would get blocked unconditionally IP based> Thanks for the smtpd_recipient_restrictions list, it sounds interesting!it's for submission only! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20150224/aa3dc7f5/attachment.sig>
On 24.02.2015 20:29, Reindl Harald wrote:> > > don't allow senders which you would not receive mail for - period >Seems interesting, at least until the bots adapt to this. Any idea how could this be implemented ? -- Best regards, Adrian Minta