similar to: FTS Index based on UserDB preference

On 18.9.2020 17.45, Scott Q. wrote: > Does anyone know if it's possible to do FTS Index based on a userdb > preference ? Basically if the preference is 'on' , dovecot goes ahead > with the fts indexing for that particular user. > > I'm guessing right now it's not possible but is there anyone that > could envision writing such a patch ? If so, can you contact

Hi, I've just enabled FTS via Lucene on my Dovecot 2.2.24 installation but I see the indexer crashing ?always?. This simple testcase with a very tiny testing mailbox exposes the issue immediately: doveadm -v index -u anmesse INBOX Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. rescan_clear_unseen_mailbox (rescan_ctx=rescan_ctx at entry=0x0, vname=0x555555839820 "INBOX.Testfolder

Core was generated by `dovecot/indexer-worker'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0x00007f30f7ad056d in __exchange_and_add (__val=-1, __mem=0xfffffffffffffff8) at /usr/src/debug/gcc-4.8.5-20150702/obj-x86_64-redhat-linux/x86_64-redhat-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/atomicity.h:49 49 { return __atomic_fetch_add(__mem, __val, __ATOMIC_ACQ_REL); } (gdb) bt full #0

On 10 May 2015, at 06:19, Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dovecot at reub.net> wrote: > > I'm now seeing these crashes in the indexing code: > > May 10 12:22:32 tornado.reub.net dovecot: master: Dovecot v2.2.17.rc1 (3903badc4ee0+) starting up for imap, lmtp, sieve > ... > May 10 13:07:50 tornado.reub.net dovecot: indexer: Error: Indexer worker disconnected, discarding 1

Hi, THis is a core problem in Dovecot in my understanding. In my opinion, the rescan in dovecot should send to the FTS plugin the list of "supposedly" indexed emails (UID), and the plugin shall purge the redundant UID (i..e UID present in the index but not in the list sent by dovecot) and send back the list of UID not in its indexes to dovecot, so Dovect can send one by one the

In such case, as long as the API is not upgraded, should doveadm index -A -q \* be considered a replacement of doveadm fts rescan On 2019-02-14 16:24, Timo Sirainen via dovecot wrote: > Hi, > > The rescan() function is a bit badly designed. Currently what you could do what fts-lucene does and: > - Get list of UIDs for all mails in each folder > - If Xapian has UID that

Hi all, I have recently worked on fts plugin for ElasticSearch. https://github.com/filiphanes/fts-elastic It is forked from fts-elasticsearch as you can see in PR https://github.com/atkinsj/fts-elasticsearch/pull/21 with following changes (maybe some more) - no duplicate json keys in indexed documents, so compatible with ES 7.x - 1 elastic index for all users with routing by username -

Am Donnerstag, den 04.07.2019, 12:27 +0300 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot: > On 4.7.2019 12.22, Maciej Milaszewski IQ PL via dovecot wrote: > > Hi > > So you're advised to use a solr or something else? > > > > Using any FTS is advisable, currently suitable ones would be SOLR or > Xapian (see https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian) > Hi Aki, I didn't yet

>> A few clients have 25K and more e-mail >> >> I thinking about use solr like: >> ?fts = solr >> ?fts_solr = debug url=http://IP:8983/solr/ (solr in external machine) >> >> Does it make sense ? use dovecot_indexes and fts ? >> What is the difference in performance? >> > Hi! > > Dovecot indexes are not actually related to FTS that

Hi I have a question about tunning dovecot-2.2.36.x Mail was stared in storage via nfs in MAILDIR via /home/us/username at domain.ltd/MAILDIR/ I use additionally local dovecot_indexes via SSD disk (/var/dovecot_indexes%h) A few clients have 25K and more e-mail I thinking about use solr like: ?fts = solr ?fts_solr = debug url=http://IP:8983/solr/ (solr in external machine) Does it make sense ?

Hello, Im getting problem on FTS on new created folders (mailboxes). How to simulate: - Enable FTS (solr on our case) - Create a new folder (mailbox) - Move some message to that mailbox - Try to search for the message contents *doveadm search -u user at domain text sometext* # Found nothing, but if i move the message to another mailbox, the search catch the message. # I tried doveadm index

Hi, FTS Xapian matches my targets for the plugins (replacing deprecated fts-squat in a production environment) https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian Please do not hesitate to add "issues" on github, if the case happen Hope it helps JM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I'm using Dovecot 2.2.13 with Dovecot Director, Doveadm server and FTS. I want to run doveadm on Director hosts, but Dovecot server on backend hosts reject "fts *" commands. On Dovecot Director hosts: # doveadm fts optimize -u u0001 at example.jp # echo $? 75 # doveadm fts rescan -u u0001 at example.jp # echo $? 75 doveadm index -u u0001 at example.jp INBOX #

Hi, sorry for previous message, i accidentaly send it before it was complete. Recently, i was configuring a setup with one proxy, which is doing authentication and multiple backends, which doesn't have access to user database (see https://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot at dovecot.org/msg70123.html ). Now i wanted to use FTS (solr) on backends but i'm getting this error everytime

I've built a new dovecot + fts-solr instance; I've now picked up & am running the recently released solr 8.7.0. In a test account, I've one message -- in the 'Drafts' folder. On exec of fts 'index' doveadm index -u testuser at example.com -q '*' I get a 401 unauthorized indexing failure, only for the one dir+message in 'Drafts', 2020-11-13

> On 02/11/2020 15:11 PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 11/2/20 12:44 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > you should try removing use_libfts from your config line and let solr do that part. > > sry, i'm a bit confused. > > you'd suggested I _add_ it, > > https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2020-October/120258.html > > > I

Hi all, I have just stumbled over an issue with the FTS plugin of dovecot. For our primary namespace, INBOX and its subfolders, searching works without any problems but in a second namespace, which I have created for old/archived mails, searching of the mail text/body does not work. I can see the search request in the tomcat log but no result is created and the mail client (Thunderbird) keeps

I don't know if this was supposed to have changed with dovecot2, but http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS shows fts = squat solr so, since I have the lucene plugin?"fts = lucene" works by itself?I tried fts = squat lucene but: $ doveadm index '*' doveadm(dave): Error: fts: Failed to initialize backend 'squat lucene': Unknown backend So, is that syntax

I've had squat running on dovecot 2.0 and have been updating all users mailbox indexes nighty via cron with this command: doveadm -v search -A text xyzzyx I've just updated to 2.1 and I'm migrating to lucene indexes, but reading the documentation I'm having a hard time understanding the semantic differences between indexing and rescanning. If I were to continue to run an

Hi, I'm currently looking over the FTS pages to enable it in my dovecot. But I'm unsure what the best settings of the lucene plugin are, if you receive german and english mails. Wiki says: textcat_conf=<path> textcat_dir=<path>: If specified, enable guessing the stemming language for emails and search keywords. This is a little bit problematic in practice, since indexing and