similar to: Per-user sieve_before settings?

> centos 7.x is latest, so if you need help upgrade make a bug report to > centos, not waste your time here since you choiced a precompiled > problem, reporting here 7s helpfull if you use dovecot compiled with > the latest version here, this migth be a unknown bug you then have > found, but not if you use precompiled problems, then report to the > maintainers of such software

Il 26-11-2015 15:15 John R. Dennison ha scritto: > You are strongly encouraged to update that CentOS system. Current is > 6.7 (released some 3 months ago) and dovecot-2.0.9-19. Ouch! I copied outdated information from my old post. My current system _is_ CentOS 6.7 with dovecot dovecot-2.0.9-19.el6_7.2.x86_64 Sorry for the confusion. Still, the problems remain > If you find you need a

Hi Javier, thanks for your reply. I already checked SIS and, while interesting, is not what I want, because: 1) it can be difficult to restore a single message/attachment from a backup 2) only the attachments, and not the entire messages, are deduped. Message-based hardlinks really exists for a reason. The good news is that I found _why_ they are not working: it depends from how dovecot and

Hi, We're running dovecot 2.2.13, virtual users, with postfix. We have an olddomain and a new domainname. To 'translate' *@olddomain into *@newdomain, I have configured: > cat /etc/postfix/canonical > @olddomain.com @newdomain.com While this seems to work, lately we have noticed that dovecot occasionally creates mailboxes for non-existent users, like: >

Thanks again Rowland for getting back to me.  Here's my comments below: >> /etc/hosts: >> 127.0.0.1       localhost >> 192.168.0.17    ad.domain.intranet ad >> 192.168.0.21    domain-ad.domain.intranet     domain-ad > > Remove the line above, this is the old AD domain and shouldn't have > anything pointing to the new one. Have deleted this line. 

Hi, On one of my servers (old one, version 1.2.5) user reported that vacation message for basic address works fine, but not for the aliases. I know that this is an old version, but we can't simply switch them to the most current dovecot release without preparing and testing everything... So I'm rather asking for help with debugging the case :) This person has email my.name at

On 14/07/15 12:26, Steffen Kaiser wrote: > > You asked about "newer dovecot versions", v2.2 does so. > Fair enough :) So, with v2.2+ the hardlink approach is irremediably gone, at least with LMTP (and without relying to SiS)? -- Danti Gionatan Supporto Tecnico Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it email: g.danti at assyoma.it - info at assyoma.it GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8

On 8/23/2017 4:30 AM, lists wrote: > Hi, > > Not sure what the lack of replies means... As postfix is also > involved, should I better ask there? > > It seems a little bit in between postfix and dovecot... > > Just to clearify one thing I wrote: > > On 22-8-2017 16:23, lists wrote: >> We're running dovecot 2.2.13, virtual users, with postfix. We >>

Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2004 11:34 am Post subject: Samba/winbind and ADS problem I almost have this. I have read the docs, I have read this, I have purchased both books from the samba team, and I cannot find any help from any of these. We are trying to migrate from OLDDOMAIN (an NT4 Domain) to NEWDOMAIN (our Win2k3 Domain). I have a two way trust right now between the domains. I have

On 8/23/2017 2:53 PM, mj wrote: > > On 08/23/2017 06:03 PM, Noel wrote: >> Don't use wildcard aliases.? They break recipient validation and >> cause postfix to accept all addresses. >> >> Instead use 1-1 aliases, such as >> user1 at olddomaon? user1 at newdomain >> user2 at olddomaon? user2 at newdomain > > But we have 500+ addresses in ldap,

Hi, When installing Samba, I made it a PDC in a new domain. Now I would like the old NT4 PDC in the old domain to become a plain host in my Samba domain. Is this possible? I need to keep the old NT4 machine because it's running the Symantec Corporate Edition NAV. In other words, I have NEWDOMAIN with Samba PDC and all clients OLDDOMAIN with NT4 PDC alone, no client Can my NT4 PDC become

Hello, I'm trying to migrate mail accounts from an old server to a new one. As I need to migrate dozens of accounts which take about 1G each, I need to do stateful sync to make my migration in two times : 1 - I run a : doveadm -D -o mail_fsync=never -o imapc_user=user1 at olddomain.fr sync -s "" -R -1 -u user1 at newdomain.fr imapc: > /tmp/firstsync.log 2>&1 my

I was wondering if somebody could help me with an Apache re-write rule. Apparently CentOS 6.8 is running apache-2.2.15-53. I am trying to redirect all pages except for two pages. The apache rewrite directives in the httpd config are: RewriteEngine on RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI}!^/test/ RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI}!^/my-folder/ RewriteRule (.*) http://www.newdomain.com/$1 [R=301,L] These commands

Hi all, I have some updates on the hard-link discussion. First, let me explain that I installed a test machine with CentOS 7.1 and dovecot/pigeonhole version 2.2.10-4 and the results where identical on what I had on CentOS 6.7 and dovecot 2.0.9-19 The bottom line is that hardlinking works only when no, or at most only one, RCPT have sieve filtering. For example: - if no RCPT has sieve

Il 01-06-2017 19:42 Jeremy Allison ha scritto: > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 03:11:53PM +0200, Gionatan Danti wrote: >> However, *no* user authentication is possible on samba shares when >> the VPN tunnel is down? >> >> Do you have any suggestions? > > I think Uri and Volker did the work on this. Uri, can you > give an update on where we stand with offline auth

Sorry for the bump... Anyone know if it is possible to have multiple protocols instances with different ssl_protocols settings? Regards. On 07/02/15 00:03, Gionatan Danti wrote: > Hi all, > anyone with some ideas? > > Thanks. > > Il 2015-02-02 23:08 Gionatan Danti ha scritto: >> Hi all, >> I have a question regarding the "ssl_protocols" parameter.

Hi list, we all know why ZFS is not included in RHEL/CentOS distributions: its CDDL license is/seems not compatible with GPL license. I'm not a layer, and I do not have any strong opinion on the matter. However, as a sysadmin, I found ZFS to be extremely useful, especially considering BTRFS sad state. I would *really* love to have ZFS on Linux more intergrated with current CentOS. From

Il 23-12-2019 12:04 Gionatan Danti ha scritto: > On 19/12/19 11:08, Gionatan Danti wrote: >> Hi list, >> many moons ago I asked about preserving hardlink between identical >> messages when pigeonhole (for sieve filtering) was used. >> >> The reply was that, while hardlink worked well for non-filtered >> messages, using pigeonhole broke the hardlink (ie:

Hi list, many moons ago I asked about preserving hardlink between identical messages when pigeonhole (for sieve filtering) was used. The reply was that, while hardlink worked well for non-filtered messages, using pigeonhole broke the hardlink (ie: some message-specific data was appended to the actual mail file). Here you can find the original thread:

Hi all, I have a question regarding the "ssl_protocols" parameter. I understand that editing the 10-ssl.conf file I can set the ssl_protocols variable as required. At the same time, I can edit a single protocol file (eg: 20-pop3.conf) to set the ssl_protocols for a specific protocol/listener. I wander if (and how) I can create a different listener for another POP3 instance, for