Hi list, many moons ago I asked about preserving hardlink between identical messages when pigeonhole (for sieve filtering) was used. The reply was that, while hardlink worked well for non-filtered messages, using pigeonhole broke the hardlink (ie: some message-specific data was appended to the actual mail file). Here you can find the original thread: https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2015-November/102579.html I would ask the same things today: is dovecot+pigeonhole capable of storing the same incoming message, sent to multiple rcpt or to a group/alias expanding in multiple recipients, as a single hardlink? Note: I know about SIS, but it has some important drawback and I would avoid using it. Thanks. -- Danti Gionatan Supporto Tecnico Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it email: g.danti at assyoma.it - info at assyoma.it GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8
On 19/12/19 11:08, Gionatan Danti wrote:> Hi list, > many moons ago I asked about preserving hardlink between identical > messages when pigeonhole (for sieve filtering) was used. > > The reply was that, while hardlink worked well for non-filtered > messages, using pigeonhole broke the hardlink (ie: some message-specific > data was appended to the actual mail file). Here you can find the > original thread: > https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2015-November/102579.html > > I would ask the same things today: is dovecot+pigeonhole capable of > storing the same incoming message, sent to multiple rcpt or to a > group/alias expanding in multiple recipients, as a single hardlink? > > Note: I know about SIS, but it has some important drawback and I would > avoid using it. > > Thanks.Hi all, any thoughts on the matter? Thanks. -- Danti Gionatan Supporto Tecnico Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it email: g.danti at assyoma.it - info at assyoma.it GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8
Il 23-12-2019 12:04 Gionatan Danti ha scritto:> On 19/12/19 11:08, Gionatan Danti wrote: >> Hi list, >> many moons ago I asked about preserving hardlink between identical >> messages when pigeonhole (for sieve filtering) was used. >> >> The reply was that, while hardlink worked well for non-filtered >> messages, using pigeonhole broke the hardlink (ie: some >> message-specific data was appended to the actual mail file). Here you >> can find the original thread: >> https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2015-November/102579.html >> >> I would ask the same things today: is dovecot+pigeonhole capable of >> storing the same incoming message, sent to multiple rcpt or to a >> group/alias expanding in multiple recipients, as a single hardlink? >> >> Note: I know about SIS, but it has some important drawback and I would >> avoid using it. >> >> Thanks. > > Hi all, any thoughts on the matter? > Thanks.Sorry for the bump, anyone with some suggestions? Thanks. -- Danti Gionatan Supporto Tecnico Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it email: g.danti at assyoma.it - info at assyoma.it GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8
Seemingly Similar Threads
- Dovecot, pigeonhole and hardlinks
- Questions about hardlinks, alternate storage and compression]
- Questions about hardlinks, alternate storage and compression
- Questions about hardlinks, alternate storage and compression
- Questions about hardlinks, alternate storage and compression