similar to: doveadm protocol bug

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "doveadm protocol bug"

2019 Jan 16
0
doveadm neglecting to exit in failure?
<!doctype html> <html> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> </head> <body> <div> Yeah. except in this particular case where it doesn't actually matter. Your expunge went thru. </div> <div> <br> </div> <div> Aki </div> <blockquote type="cite"> <div> On 15
2020 May 24
1
Re: missing man page for “doveadm dsync-server”?
> On May 24, 2020, at 2:58 PM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > > >> On 24/05/2020 21:56 Felipe Gasper <felipe at felipegasper.com> wrote: >> >> >> Hello, >> >> Is there a man page for this command? I don?t see one in the repository. Given its utility in, e.g., syncing mailboxes via SSH, it seems like documentation
2020 May 24
2
missing man page for “doveadm dsync-server”?
Hello, Is there a man page for this command? I don?t see one in the repository. Given its utility in, e.g., syncing mailboxes via SSH, it seems like documentation for this command would be useful? Thank you! -Felipe Gasper
2020 May 24
0
Re: missing man page for “doveadm dsync-server”?
> On 24/05/2020 21:56 Felipe Gasper <felipe at felipegasper.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > Is there a man page for this command? I don?t see one in the repository. Given its utility in, e.g., syncing mailboxes via SSH, it seems like documentation for this command would be useful? > > Thank you! > > -Felipe Gasper Hi! Man pages are in
2020 May 27
0
doveadm: extra lines?
I did a bit more digging, and the issue appears to manifest only when doveadm sends back an error code. Here is a ?user? and a ?kick?, both of which fail with error codes: > echo -ne 'VERSION\tdoveadm-server\t1\t0\nD\tharry\tuser\nD\t\tkick\tharry\n' | nc -U /var/run/dovecot/doveadm-server | xxd 0000000: 2b0a 0a2d 5553 4147 450a 0a2d 0a0a 2d4e +..-USAGE..-..-N 0000010: 4f54 464f 554e
2020 May 26
2
doveadm: extra lines?
Hello, I?m sending doveadm ?kick? commands to doveadm-server via the doveadm protocol. When ?kick? sends back a NOTFOUND error, though, it?s sending back additional output. strace shows: write(3<UNIX:[3158354->3156665]>, "\t\tkick\tmyssltest\n", 17) = 17 ... read(3<UNIX:[3158354->3156665]>, "\n-NOTFOUND\n\n-\n", 8192) = 14 Going by the protocol
2019 Jan 15
2
doveadm neglecting to exit in failure?
----- cpssltest at cpanelssltest.org [/usr/local/cpanel]# doveadm -v expunge -u cpssltest -- mailbox-guid b8a359119e771b58484a0000a841250d savedbefore 365days; echo $? doveadm(cpssltest): Error: net_connect_unix(/var/run/dovecot/stats-writer) failed: Permission denied 0 ----- ^^ In the above, shouldn?t the ?doveadm? command have exited nonzero to indicate a failure to connect? Thanks! -Felipe
2018 Oct 31
1
OCSP Stapling and Certificate Transparency
On 05/01/2018 09:08 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > >> On 01 May 2018 at 19:03 Felipe Gasper < felipe at felipegasper.com >> <mailto:felipe at felipegasper.com>> wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> For CAs that do not include a signed certificate timestamp in their >> newly-issued certificates, does Dovecot support either OCSP stapling >> or the
2018 May 01
0
OCSP Stapling and Certificate Transparency
<!doctype html> <html> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> </head> <body> <div> <br> </div> <blockquote type="cite"> <div> On 01 May 2018 at 19:03 Felipe Gasper < <a href="mailto:felipe@felipegasper.com">felipe@felipegasper.com</a>> wrote: </div>
2018 May 01
2
OCSP Stapling and Certificate Transparency
Hi, For CAs that do not include a signed certificate timestamp in their newly-issued certificates, does Dovecot support either OCSP stapling or the Certificate Transparency TLS extension? If the TLS extension is supported, how does the admin configure the timestamp for each certificate? I?m wondering if any MUAs will follow Google?s lead and insist on CT. Thank you! -Felipe Gasper
2020 May 20
1
Re: dsync “destination” argument
> On May 20, 2020, at 10:46 AM, Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > >> On 16. May 2020, at 3.46, Felipe Gasper <felipe at felipegasper.com> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> Some code that I didn?t write but am maintaining passes a local script?s path as dsync?s ?destination? argument, like so: >> >> dsync -D -u john -v backup
2018 Aug 23
2
Is the Doveadm HTTP API considered stable for production use?
On 23.08.18 15:35, Felipe Gasper wrote: > >> On Aug 23, 2018, at 8:14 AM, James Beck <james.beck at aa.net.uk> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 09:54:44AM -0400, Felipe Gasper wrote: >>> If you don?t want to use the HTTP API, you can use the raw doveadm protocol. >>> >>> https://wiki.dovecot.org/Design/DoveadmProtocol >>>
2019 Mar 12
1
Re: “doveadm mailbox” command fails with UTF-8 mailboxes
> On Mar 12, 2019, at 3:28 PM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > > >> On 12 March 2019 21:20 Felipe Gasper via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >> >> >> Hello, >> >> I?ve got a strange misconfiguration where the following command: >> >> doveadm -f pager mailbox status -u spamutf8 'messages vsize
2020 May 16
2
dsync “destination” argument
Hello, Some code that I didn?t write but am maintaining passes a local script?s path as dsync?s ?destination? argument, like so: dsync -D -u john -v backup -R -1 "/code/dsync_client.pl" 127.0.0.1 john at mydomain.org dsync_client.pl establishes a TCP connection with a remote dsync process then acts as a proxy between the two dsync processes. ?127.0.0.1? and ?john at mydomain.org?
2018 Aug 23
0
Is the Doveadm HTTP API considered stable for production use?
> On Aug 23, 2018, at 8:44 AM, Reio Remma <reio at mrstuudio.ee> wrote: > > On 23.08.18 15:35, Felipe Gasper wrote: >> >>> On Aug 23, 2018, at 8:14 AM, James Beck <james.beck at aa.net.uk> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 09:54:44AM -0400, Felipe Gasper wrote: >>>> If you don?t want to use the HTTP API, you can use the
2019 Mar 12
0
Re: “doveadm mailbox” command fails with UTF-8 mailboxes
> On 12 March 2019 21:20 Felipe Gasper via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > Hello, > > I?ve got a strange misconfiguration where the following command: > > doveadm -f pager mailbox status -u spamutf8 'messages vsize guid' INBOX 'INBOX.*' > > ? fails with error code 68, saying that it can?t find one of the mailboxes. (It lists
2005 Sep 14
13
table sorting/manipulation library?
I have a library I''ve developed that I believe is the most flexible and useful table sorting/striping/row-selecting library around. Big features: Single and multiple-level sort Arbitrary sort criteria (IP address, date, etc.) Works with table headers that are > 1 row or column large Stripe tables and/or enable row selecting Row selecting supports drag-select and SHIFT-click No extra
2018 Aug 23
2
Is the Doveadm HTTP API considered stable for production use?
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 09:54:44AM -0400, Felipe Gasper wrote: > If you don?t want to use the HTTP API, you can use the raw doveadm protocol. > > https://wiki.dovecot.org/Design/DoveadmProtocol > > -FG Thanks, I didn't know about that. I suppose testing the HTTP API and then switching to the raw doveadm protocol over TCP if it turns out "crashy" wouldn't mean
2005 Sep 15
1
server push?
Has anyone done much work with server-side push and AJAX/J? (XML or JSON) As best I can tell, the ideal solution to this would be the multipart/x-mixed-replace MIME type. Mozilla''s XMLHttpRequest now has support for this, so this is on people''s minds, but how to make it work on the server end? You have to keep a connection open.....and a process on the server to go with it.
2020 Sep 28
1
custom userdb server, Exim, and proxying
Hi all, We have Exim using Dovecot for authentication. Dovecot, in turn, consults a custom internal server that answers Dovecot?s userdb queries. When IMAP connections arrive, for some users we want to forward those connections--without authentication--to an external IMAP server. For these users, we return ?proxy_maybe? and ?nopassword? in the authn response from our userdb server. This tells