Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "missing man page for “doveadm dsync-server”?"
2020 May 24
1
Re: missing man page for “doveadm dsync-server”?
> On May 24, 2020, at 2:58 PM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On 24/05/2020 21:56 Felipe Gasper <felipe at felipegasper.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there a man page for this command? I don?t see one in the repository. Given its utility in, e.g., syncing mailboxes via SSH, it seems like documentation
2020 May 20
1
Re: dsync “destination” argument
> On May 20, 2020, at 10:46 AM, Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote:
>
>> On 16. May 2020, at 3.46, Felipe Gasper <felipe at felipegasper.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Some code that I didn?t write but am maintaining passes a local script?s path as dsync?s ?destination? argument, like so:
>>
>> dsync -D -u john -v backup
2018 Oct 31
1
OCSP Stapling and Certificate Transparency
On 05/01/2018 09:08 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
>> On 01 May 2018 at 19:03 Felipe Gasper < felipe at felipegasper.com
>> <mailto:felipe at felipegasper.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> For CAs that do not include a signed certificate timestamp in their
>> newly-issued certificates, does Dovecot support either OCSP stapling
>> or the
2020 May 16
2
dsync “destination” argument
Hello,
Some code that I didn?t write but am maintaining passes a local script?s path as dsync?s ?destination? argument, like so:
dsync -D -u john -v backup -R -1 "/code/dsync_client.pl" 127.0.0.1 john at mydomain.org
dsync_client.pl establishes a TCP connection with a remote dsync process then acts as a proxy between the two dsync processes. ?127.0.0.1? and ?john at mydomain.org?
2018 May 01
2
OCSP Stapling and Certificate Transparency
Hi,
For CAs that do not include a signed certificate timestamp in their newly-issued certificates, does Dovecot support either OCSP stapling or the Certificate Transparency TLS extension?
If the TLS extension is supported, how does the admin configure the timestamp for each certificate?
I?m wondering if any MUAs will follow Google?s lead and insist on CT.
Thank you!
-Felipe Gasper
2019 Jan 15
2
doveadm neglecting to exit in failure?
-----
cpssltest at cpanelssltest.org [/usr/local/cpanel]# doveadm -v expunge -u cpssltest -- mailbox-guid b8a359119e771b58484a0000a841250d savedbefore 365days; echo $?
doveadm(cpssltest): Error: net_connect_unix(/var/run/dovecot/stats-writer) failed: Permission denied
0
-----
^^ In the above, shouldn?t the ?doveadm? command have exited nonzero to indicate a failure to connect?
Thanks!
-Felipe
2020 May 26
2
doveadm: extra lines?
Hello,
I?m sending doveadm ?kick? commands to doveadm-server via the doveadm protocol. When ?kick? sends back a NOTFOUND error, though, it?s sending back additional output. strace shows:
write(3<UNIX:[3158354->3156665]>, "\t\tkick\tmyssltest\n", 17) = 17
...
read(3<UNIX:[3158354->3156665]>, "\n-NOTFOUND\n\n-\n", 8192) = 14
Going by the protocol
2020 May 24
0
Re: missing man page for “doveadm dsync-server”?
> On 24/05/2020 21:56 Felipe Gasper <felipe at felipegasper.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Is there a man page for this command? I don?t see one in the repository. Given its utility in, e.g., syncing mailboxes via SSH, it seems like documentation for this command would be useful?
>
> Thank you!
>
> -Felipe Gasper
Hi!
Man pages are in
2020 May 18
2
dsync multiple mailboxes per connection?
Hello,
Is it possible to batch syncs of multiple mailboxes in a single dsync session?
We?re transferring users between servers and want to use dsync to transfer the mail; ideally we?d like to avoid creating a separate TCP connection per user.
Thank you!
cheers,
-Felipe Gasper
2019 Mar 12
1
Re: “doveadm mailbox” command fails with UTF-8 mailboxes
> On Mar 12, 2019, at 3:28 PM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On 12 March 2019 21:20 Felipe Gasper via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I?ve got a strange misconfiguration where the following command:
>>
>> doveadm -f pager mailbox status -u spamutf8 'messages vsize
2005 Sep 14
13
table sorting/manipulation library?
I have a library I''ve developed that I believe is the most flexible and
useful table sorting/striping/row-selecting library around.
Big features:
Single and multiple-level sort
Arbitrary sort criteria (IP address, date, etc.)
Works with table headers that are > 1 row or column large
Stripe tables and/or enable row selecting
Row selecting supports drag-select and SHIFT-click
No extra
2020 Sep 28
1
custom userdb server, Exim, and proxying
Hi all,
We have Exim using Dovecot for authentication. Dovecot, in turn, consults a custom internal server that answers Dovecot?s userdb queries.
When IMAP connections arrive, for some users we want to forward those connections--without authentication--to an external IMAP server. For these users, we return ?proxy_maybe? and ?nopassword? in the authn response from our userdb server. This tells
2019 Mar 12
6
“doveadm mailbox” command fails with UTF-8 mailboxes
Hello,
I?ve got a strange misconfiguration where the following command:
doveadm -f pager mailbox status -u spamutf8 'messages vsize guid' INBOX 'INBOX.*'
? fails with error code 68, saying that it can?t find one of the mailboxes. (It lists the user?s other mailboxes.) The name of the mailbox in question is saved to disk in UTF-8 rather than mUTF-7, but strace shows that doveadm
2018 Aug 23
2
Is the Doveadm HTTP API considered stable for production use?
On 23.08.18 15:35, Felipe Gasper wrote:
>
>> On Aug 23, 2018, at 8:14 AM, James Beck <james.beck at aa.net.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 09:54:44AM -0400, Felipe Gasper wrote:
>>> If you don?t want to use the HTTP API, you can use the raw doveadm protocol.
>>>
>>> https://wiki.dovecot.org/Design/DoveadmProtocol
>>>
2018 Aug 23
2
Is the Doveadm HTTP API considered stable for production use?
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 09:54:44AM -0400, Felipe Gasper wrote:
> If you don?t want to use the HTTP API, you can use the raw doveadm protocol.
>
> https://wiki.dovecot.org/Design/DoveadmProtocol
>
> -FG
Thanks, I didn't know about that. I suppose testing the HTTP API and
then switching to the raw doveadm protocol over TCP if it turns out
"crashy" wouldn't mean
2018 Aug 24
1
HTTP API vs. doveadm
To follow up on an earlier thread: is there any functional advantage of the new HTTP API over the doveadm API?
How does the HTTP API deal with a query like ?mailbox list?, which (as best I can tell) could return non-UTF8 text?
-FG
2016 Jun 21
2
Pluggable SNI?
Hello,
How feasible would it be to have a ?pluggable? Dovecot setup that would permit arbitrary logic for fetching TLS/SNI certificates and key, rather than having to hard-code each domain?s resources in a configuration file?
A couple scenarios that I envision such a framework being able to accommodate:
1) An internal TLS service that accepts queries via a UNIX socket by domain name and
2016 Nov 10
4
lazy-load SNI?
Hello,
We?re rolling out large SNI deployments for our mail servers. Each domain gets an entry like this in the config:
local_name mail.foo.com {
ssl_cert = </ssl/domain_tls/*.foo.com/combined
ssl_key = </ssl/domain_tls/*.foo.com/combined
}
There are a couple problems we?re finding with this approach:
1) Dovecot wants to load everything at once, which has some machines taking
2020 May 20
0
Re: dsync “destination” argument
> On 16. May 2020, at 3.46, Felipe Gasper <felipe at felipegasper.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Some code that I didn?t write but am maintaining passes a local script?s path as dsync?s ?destination? argument, like so:
>
> dsync -D -u john -v backup -R -1 "/code/dsync_client.pl" 127.0.0.1 john at mydomain.org
>
> dsync_client.pl establishes a TCP
2019 Jan 16
0
doveadm neglecting to exit in failure?
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
Yeah. except in this particular case where it doesn't actually matter. Your expunge went thru.
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Aki
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
On 15