similar to: Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept special use folder names

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept special use folder names"

2020 Apr 16
2
Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept special use folder names
I do not have the log file anymore from the home dir. It just complains that the folder Spam does not exist. dovecot: lmtp(xxxx): oG8YI6enmF7FIAAAI7dPvA: sieve: Execution of script /xxxx/.dovecot.sieve failed, but implicit keep was successful (user logfile /xxx/.dovecot.sieve.log may reveal additional details) -----Original Message----- From: Stephan Bosch [mailto:stephan at rename-it.nl]
2020 Apr 16
2
Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept special use folder names
It is a 'special use' folder, so it only appears to exist in mail clients. # spam folders merging mailbox Junk { special_use = \Junk auto = create } mailbox Spam { special_use = \Junk auto = no } mailbox "Junk E-mail" { special_use = \Junk auto = no } On 16/04/2020 23:19, Marc Roos wrote: > I do not have the log file anymore from the
2020 Apr 16
1
Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept special use folder names
Hmmm, confusing, clients should then display the mailbox name redirected by the server. If a user in a front end just sees the 'Junk E-mail', that is the name he is going to be using in his mailbox rules. If he does not know that this is actually the Junk folder on the server, he will make an incorrect message rule. So I guess you have to correct this server side, before storing
2020 Apr 16
0
Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept special use folder names
On 16/04/2020 23:38, Marc Roos wrote: > It is a 'special use' folder, so it only appears to exist in mail > clients. > > # spam folders merging > mailbox Junk { > special_use = \Junk > auto = create > } > mailbox Spam { > special_use = \Junk > auto = no > } > mailbox "Junk E-mail" { > special_use
2020 Apr 16
0
Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept special use folder names
On 16/04/2020 23:19, Marc Roos wrote: > I do not have the log file anymore from the home dir. It just complains > that the folder Spam does not exist. > > dovecot: lmtp(xxxx): oG8YI6enmF7FIAAAI7dPvA: sieve: Execution of script > /xxxx/.dovecot.sieve failed, but implicit keep was successful (user > logfile /xxx/.dovecot.sieve.log may reveal additional details) So, does that
2020 Apr 16
0
Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept special use folder names
On 16/04/2020 21:04, Marc Roos wrote: > Sieve rule fileinto Spam fails, while fileinto Junk succeeds > > > mailbox Spam { > special_use = \Junk > auto = no > } > > dovecot-pigeonhole-2.2.36-3.el7_7.1.x86_64 > dovecot-2.2.36-3.el7_7.1.x86_64 > CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core I can't tell without insight in the error message and your full
2019 Dec 15
3
Local lmtp proxy on backend server
I receive a local mail when I do a 'mail test' on a backend svr1 with this[0] configuration. However when I just add only one configuration change 'lmtp_proxy = yes' I am getting these errors[1]. I would expect this email to still be delivered locally, should this be working or do I misunderstand the lmtp proxy functionality? [0] passdb { args = auth_verbose = default
2019 Dec 16
1
Local lmtp proxy on backend server
I added this: passdb { driver = passwd skip = authenticated } Which enables indeed local delivery, I also noticed this. Maybe the password field check shoud not be done, when you enable skip authentication? Dec 16 10:26:37 svr1 dovecot: auth-worker(12046): Debug: passwd(test): lookup Dec 16 10:26:37 svr1 dovecot: auth-worker(12046): passwd(test): invalid password field '*'
2019 Dec 16
5
Local lmtp proxy on backend server
Hi Aki, If I adapt this configuration on svr1 like this[0], should the mail not be delivered at svr2 passdb { driver = pam # [session=yes] [setcred=yes] [failure_show_msg=yes] [max_requests=<n>] # [cache_key=<key>] [<service name>] #args = dovecot default_fields = proxy=y host=svr2 } passdb { driver = passwd skip = authenticated default_fields = proxy=y
2019 Dec 17
1
Local lmtp proxy on backend server
Hi Aki, you have some ingenious remark that could help? -----Original Message----- To: aki.tuomi; dovecot Subject: RE: Local lmtp proxy on backend server I am staring constantly at the same logs, this is what I get from dovecot[1]. Sendmail[2] is sending with test at svr1 maybe this overrides lmtp proxying? This is a test with a special-userdb passwd-file also having host=svr2 [1] Dec
2019 Oct 03
4
sieve cli
i am using dovecot-2.2.36-3.el7_7.1.x86_64 on centos 7 is it possible to activate / deactivate a sieve script for a mailbox from the command line? my mailboxes are currently stores in /../vmail/domain.tld/username if i activate / deactivate a filter set using roundcube (webmail system) then it creates or deletes a symbolic link /../vmail/domain.tld/username/dovecot.sieve? which points to a
2020 Apr 15
2
INBOX folders disappeared after upgrading
Hi, tried to Google/etc to see what to tweak.. not finding anything helpful. So.. I've been running my private mail through a Linux server since approx year 2000. The OS has been various flavors of Fedora or CentOS, since for work, I have to spend all day supporting some sort of Red Hat flavor. So I run SquirrelMail on top of Dovecot and Postfix on CentOS 7, things have been great for like
2020 Jan 23
2
yum update / kernal update failed - remove or repair
On 1/22/20 3:57 PM, Gary Stainburn wrote: > I have managed to find out what happened in the yum update and it turns out it was a mess. It looks like the server ran out of memory in the middle and things then started to fail. Any advice on how to recover from this would be greatly appreciated > > The log below shows: > > [root at vps2 ~]# yum history info 22 > Loaded plugins:
2019 Dec 16
0
Local lmtp proxy on backend server
<!doctype html> <html> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> </head> <body> <div> <br> </div> <blockquote type="cite"> <div> On 15/12/2019 23:09 Marc Roos < <a href="mailto:m.roos@f1-outsourcing.eu">m.roos@f1-outsourcing.eu</a>> wrote: </div> <div>
2019 Dec 16
0
Local lmtp proxy on backend server
Hi Aki, I also tried with changing the original ldap source to svr2. Although everywhere svr2 is configured, still mails keep being delivered locally on svr1. Do I need to configure more than 20-lmtp.conf? [@svr1 conf.d]# cat 20-lmtp.conf | grep -v '^#' lmtp_proxy = yes protocol lmtp { # Space separated list of plugins to load (default is global mail_plugins). mail_plugins
2019 Sep 26
0
CESA-2019:2836 Important CentOS 7 dovecot Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:2836 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2836 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 11077bf3f1d84c1f6859b8fa47c9392fcd509f8d6bc7b9b988e6ed7577ed04f8 dovecot-2.2.36-3.el7_7.1.i686.rpm
2019 Sep 27
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 175, Issue 4
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2020 Apr 16
0
INBOX folders disappeared after upgrading
Dave> Hi, tried to Google/etc to see what to tweak.. not finding Dave> anything helpful. So.. I've been running my private mail Dave> through a Linux server since approx year 2000. The OS has been Dave> various flavors of Fedora or CentOS, since for work, I have to Dave> spend all day supporting some sort of Red Hat flavor. Makes sense. I'm not a dovecot expert, but in
2019 Sep 27
2
Mail received but not indexed?
I have recently that some users are complaining about that they are not getting emails. While I see that they are delivered and in the inbox. When I do a doveadm force-resync -u xxxx INBOX it resolves the problem. I think this is something recent. Where/how should I resolve this issue? Recent changes 1. did some os updates 2019-08-27 2. provider took away the ssd for index storage (maybe
2019 Sep 27
2
Mail received but not indexed?
No, it is still old sendmail to /var/spool/mail/ -----Original Message----- From: Sami Ketola [mailto:sami.ketola at dovecot.fi] Sent: vrijdag 27 september 2019 15:17 To: dovecot Cc: Marc Roos Subject: Re: Mail received but not indexed? > On 27 Sep 2019, at 16.06, Marc Roos via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core) >