similar to: wrong Messages in virtual Folder

Le 21/05/2018 ? 12:38, Aki Tuomi a ?crit?: > can you try turning on pluign { fts_enforced = yes } and repeat your test? Same (wrong) result: 1. Send an email with "too6Ouka" in the body 2. Search against "too6Ouka": # doveadm search -u username mailbox INBOX body too6Ouka --> No result 3. Force re-index: # doveadm fts rescan -u username 4. Search again against

Hi I have a question about tunning dovecot-2.2.36.x Mail was stared in storage via nfs in MAILDIR via /home/us/username at domain.ltd/MAILDIR/ I use additionally local dovecot_indexes via SSD disk (/var/dovecot_indexes%h) A few clients have 25K and more e-mail I thinking about use solr like: ?fts = solr ?fts_solr = debug url=http://IP:8983/solr/ (solr in external machine) Does it make sense ?

Trying to track down a problem I've been dealing with for a while. Everything else works fine - the problem is with shared mailboxes. My present, and desired, prefix for the shared namespace is: prefix = INBOX/shared/%%d/%%n/ Some mail clients, particularly Thunderbird and Android's AquaMail, have no problem with this. But other (presumably broken) clients don't show the shared

Any thoughts on this? --- Daniel ------ Original Message ------ From: "Daniel Miller" <dmiller at amfes.com> To: "Dovecot Mailing List" <dovecot at dovecot.org> Sent: 2/12/2020 6:16:05 PM Subject: Shared Mailboxes with Multiple Domains >Trying to track down a problem I've been dealing with for a while. Everything else works fine - the problem is with

On 4.7.2019 12.14, Maciej Milaszewski IQ PL via dovecot wrote: > Hi > I have a question about tunning dovecot-2.2.36.x > > Mail was stared in storage via nfs in MAILDIR via > /home/us/username at domain.ltd/MAILDIR/ > I use additionally local dovecot_indexes via SSD disk > (/var/dovecot_indexes%h) > > A few clients have 25K and more e-mail > > I thinking about use

>> A few clients have 25K and more e-mail >> >> I thinking about use solr like: >> ?fts = solr >> ?fts_solr = debug url=http://IP:8983/solr/ (solr in external machine) >> >> Does it make sense ? use dovecot_indexes and fts ? >> What is the difference in performance? >> > Hi! > > Dovecot indexes are not actually related to FTS that

Can you install dovecot-dbg and try gdb again? Aki On 25.3.2019 3.20, Jason Lewis via dovecot wrote: > Hi, > > I've been having an issue with the indexer giving me errors on mailbox > in dovecot. > > I managed to narrow it down to a specific email in that mailbox. > > Various dovecot functions have issues with this email. > > The email itself is just spam. I can

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Larry Rosenman <larryrtx at gmail.com> wrote: > That didn't change it :( > Jul 18 15:28:14 thebighonker dovecot: auth-worker(77908): Error: > passwd-file /etc/passwd: User root has invalid UID '0' > Jul 18 15:28:14 thebighonker dovecot: auth-worker(77908): Error: > passwd-file /etc/passwd: User toor has invalid UID '0' >

Anyone? -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: larryrtx at gmail.com US Mail: 17716 Limpia Crk, Round Rock, TX 78664-7281 On 7/13/17, 2:42 PM, "Larry Rosenman" <larryrtx at gmail.com> wrote: Per my earlier post about system and virtual users, I have everything working, but I'm seeing the

The alias works fine. It's just an auth request. I'll live with it. Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy S8+. -------- Original message --------From: Bill Shirley <bill at KnoxvilleChristian.org> Date: 7/18/17 11:24 PM (GMT-06:00) To: dovecot at dovecot.org Subject: Re: passwd-file, getting invalid uid 0 Unless your userid is also zero, my guess is that Exim isn't using the

On 01/11/2020 15:20, PGNet Dev wrote: > On 11/1/20 1:56 AM, John Fawcett wrote: >> At the moment I don't see other corrections needed in dovecot apart from >> command line doveadm fts which is not a show stopper. Via doveadm search >> I confirm - on my simple config - that search for accented or non >> accented characters works correctly as it does via imap

FTR, this is being delivered via LMTP from Exim using the recommended transport / director. headers from one of my tests: Return-Path: <ler at lerctr.org> Delivered-To: ler at lerctr.org Received: from thebighonker.lerctr.org by thebighonker.lerctr.org with LMTP id EW4ZBgV7QVoIDwAAu+mOrA (envelope-from <ler at lerctr.org>) for <ler at lerctr.org>;

> On 01/11/2020 20:35 John Fawcett <john at voipsupport.it> wrote: > > > On 01/11/2020 15:20, PGNet Dev wrote: > > On 11/1/20 1:56 AM, John Fawcett wrote: > >> At the moment I don't see other corrections needed in dovecot apart from > >> command line doveadm fts which is not a show stopper. Via doveadm search > >> I confirm - on my simple

Firstly, 2.2.13 is about 5 years old. So there's that. It would be helpful if you can reproduce this with 2.2.36. Also, you forgot to actually include in your log snippet the panic. So maybe few more lines before the Raw backtrace? Aki On 20.11.2019 10.54, Maciej Milaszewski IQ PL via dovecot wrote: > Hi > I have "problem" with dovect 2.2.13 from repo debian8 and I don't

I have auto-subscribe turned on, but I had to doveadm mailbox subscribe to a LDA/Sieve created mailbox today. Did something break? doveconf -n attached. FreeBSD dovecot-2.3.9.3 Secure, fast and powerful IMAP and POP3 server dovecot-pigeonhole-0.5.9_1 Sieve plugin for the Dovecot 'deliver' LDA and LMTP -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler

Op 25-12-2017 om 23:37 schreef Larry Rosenman: > Updated (current) doveconf -n attached.... The delivered-to header tells me that the envelope has no detail part, which is what you're checking for using the "envelope" test. So, it is not strange that the test yields the empty string. There is a detail part in the "To:" header, but that would need to be tested using

This is likely fixed in more recent version, can you try with 2.2.36? Aki On 20.11.2019 11.20, Maciej Milaszewski IQ PL wrote: > Hi > Thanx for replay. > > Log: > > http://paste.debian.net/1117077/ > > > On 20.11.2019 10:07, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> Firstly, 2.2.13 is about 5 years old. So there's that. It would be >> helpful if you can reproduce this with

Joan, I understand and sympathize with your frustration - trying to get multiple applications to work together, particularly given the lack of documentation for some of them, can be extremely challenging.? That said, I suggest you consider an alternative viewpoint.? Frequently being misunderstood myself I apologize in advance if I'm reading you wrong - but it appears your view towards

Greetings dovecot-mailing list! after upgrading from debian squeeze -> debian wheezy and therefore making the big dovecot jump from 1.x to 2.x we are stuck with one final(?) error that we can't get fixed. During login attempts the following is written to the logfiles. Error: dovecot: imap: Error: dlopen(/usr/lib/dovecot/modules/lib90_sieve_plugin.so) failed:

Hello, I've never used gdb, so I don't know why I'm running into problems using "gdb bt". Usually, I'm fetching my mail using "sudo -E getmail", but this doesn't seem to work with backtrace. :-/ Output from "dovecot -n" attached. Kind regards, Peter -------------- next part -------------- # 2.3.6 (7eab80676): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf #