Displaying 20 results from an estimated 80000 matches similar to: "Setting up expunge rules on a per user basis?"
2004 Nov 19
2
Maildir/mbox on a per-user basis
Hello,
The Wiki indicates that Dovecot can do either mbox or Maildir on a
per-user basis:
default_mail_env can be overridden in userdb for each user. This works
with userdbs supporting the "mail" attribute (eg. passwd-file, SQL,
LDAP).
How exactly does one do this for passwd-file?
Thanks,
-Jon
--
Jon Nathan
jon at rupture.net
2018 Mar 21
0
Race condition when setting flags (\Deleted) + expunge quickly, leaving mails not deleted
Thank you for your thorough report, we'll look into it.
Aki
On 20.03.2018 16:56, Tomas Forsman wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I seem to have found a race condition, when setting flags on multiple emails
> rapidly. 5 commands including login to reproduce. Problem found using mutt in
> real world usage.
>
> Seems to happen both with UID STORE 1:3 and UID STORE 1,2,3 ..
>
> I
2014 Oct 04
0
Dovecot does not update maildirsize after expunge
Hello,
At the first, sorry for my englishJ
I have a problem with dovecot quota since i migrated from courier. Dovecot
does not update the Maildirsize after expunge, and the user running out of
his quota very quickly.
I checked, the file is deleted from the filesystem. If i delete the
Maildirsize file, dovecot regenerate it with the correct datas when a new
mail arrive.
Also tried to
2014 Feb 28
1
Force SSL authentication per user basis
Hi,
I'm searching a way to force encrypted connections for POP3/IMAP on a per user basis.
To not break clients which still connect in plaintext (there are
still many of it) I must implement a mechanism to force encrypted connections
on a per user basis.
The users and passwords are stored in a mysql database. So there would be no problem to
expand the database with a column like
1999 Nov 03
0
NT user rights on a per file basis
We use samba in a heterogeneous Unix (HP-UX) and NT environment. One purpose
is to give a group of about 25 NT users access to a common disk which is
situated on one of our HP-Unix machines and a small group of Unix- and NT
users to give them additionally access from NT to their Unix HOME
directories.
The NT users are authorized by an NT controller in the network.
Our problem is that NT crashes if
2002 Apr 08
0
[Bug 210] New: can't prevent port forwarding on a per-user basis
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210
Summary: can't prevent port forwarding on a per-user basis
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Platform: All
URL: http://reactor-core.org/security/HOWTO-Anonymous-CVS-
Over-SSH
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
2006 Jan 20
4
Prepending table names on a per user or sub domain basis
Here is a sample of the database structure I want to have:
someclientname-websites
someclientname-canned_responses
someclientname-canned_responses_websites
anotherclientname-websites
anotherclientname-canned_responses
anotherclientname-canned_responses_websites
As you can see I want to prepend the name of my future clients to the
table name so that they use completely different sets of data.
I
2020 May 04
1
Is It possbile to convert to DBox or MDBox on a per user basis?
Greetings,
Is It possbile to convert to DBox or MDBox on a per user basis?
If so, can someone point me to the correct documentation?
Thank you,
--
Asai
2013 Jun 19
1
mail_max_userip_connections on a per user basis
Hello,
Can the above setting be applied on a per user account basis?
I thought that maybe something like per account quotas might be a possible method but not sure.
Thanks.
2006 Jan 04
0
Traffic accounting with samba on per-user-basis - possible?
Hello,
I would like to account the amount of traffic caused by accessing the samba
file server on a per-(samba)-user basis. However I did not find any clear
information like "XYZ bytes of data transferred" in the logfile (with
loglevel10). Is there a nice way to extract this information from the
logfiles? Has anybody done this?
Do you know any other way to account this traffic? Since
2020 Apr 06
0
replication and spam removal ("doveadm expunge")
Hi Aki,
On 4/4/20 8:12 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> Can you provide doveconf -n and try turning on mail_debug=yes on both ends and try doveadm -Dv expunge ....
mail_debug=yes
is on on both ends and dovecot was restarted but anyway nothing is logged when I issue "doveadm -Dv expunge "
In the shell where I issue the "expunge" I see the following:
# /usr/bin/doveadm -Dv expunge
2018 Apr 22
1
Race condition when setting flags (\Deleted) + expunge quickly, leaving mails not deleted
On 21 March, 2018 - Aki Tuomi wrote:
> Thank you for your thorough report, we'll look into it.
Has anyone managed to reproduce this (using my transcript for example)?
With mutt, I get this problem.. If I set 'imap_pipeline_depth=0' in
.muttrc, I can't seem to reproduce it anymore.
/Tomas
--
Tomas Forsman, stric at cs.umu.se, http://people.cs.umu.se/stric/
`- SysAdmin at
2013 Mar 20
1
[LLVMdev] changing passes and changing subtargets on a per function basis
I'm implementing this capability to allow switching between mips32 and
mips16 code generation on a per function basis (should be useful for arm
to thumb switching too).
The problem is that while various things are done on a per function
basis, there are two passes registered on a per module basis (target
lowering and instruction selection).
With the new attribute scheme, we can wake up
2014 Dec 01
4
[Bug 2322] New: please let the server enable/disable delayed compression on a per user basis
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2322
Bug ID: 2322
Summary: please let the server enable/disable delayed
compression on a per user basis
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 3.7p1
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
2018 Jun 22
1
lazy expunge folder delete bug
There's a bug in "folder delete" for lazy expunge, type "1 namespace", as descibed on https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Lazyexpunge
When trying to delete a mailbox that still has messages in it, but that has no EXPUNGED/<name> counterpart, the process hangs after the imap "DELETE" command, and the following appears in the log file after a 60s timeout:
Jun
2014 Aug 17
1
Overriding global voicemail options on a per-mailbox basis
All;
I'm currently using Asterisk 1.8 and I want to be able to have each user
be able to set as many of the voicemail options as possible. The
documentation calls voicemail options that can be overridden on a
per-mailbox basis "advanced options". However, I've read conflicting
information as to which options in the section [general] can be overridden.
According to
2011 Jan 09
3
CatchAll virtual user removes spamheaders
Hi all,
I am having a small problem with a catch-all user
I have setup in my Postfix/Dovecot setup.
I am not 100% sure this is Dovecot related, but, logic tells me it is.
I have a virtual user called @reinhold.dk setup
to redirect to my main account, peter at reinhold.dk.
If I send a spam mail (GTUBE) to
peter at reinhold.dk, the mail is marked with Amavis x-headers as it should be.
If I
2013 Sep 06
2
doveadm expunge problems
Hello there,
I'm trying to use the doveadm expunge function, but it doesn't seems to
work..
I have installed a mail test server using iredmail, Dovecot and postfix
using mysql for authentications.
I sent a email to this server, and change the timestamp using touch.
the mail boxes are as follow :
/home/mail/vmail1/mydomain.fr/n/i/c/nicolas-2013.09.05.14.30.49/Maildir
I want to delete
2016 Mar 01
2
Dsync induces redundant mail after rapid append/expunge repeatedly
?I meet the problem about dsync with ?expunge. The problems is expunged
mail would reappear after dsyncing and it is easily to reproduce.
?Environment Settings:
- Two servers(serverA, serverB) both enabled plugin "*replication"*
- And more detail get by "dovecot -n" show below
?Reproduce flow:
?- ?Run two processes pA and pB both would run in while loop
?- pA?(All behavior is
2007 Nov 30
1
Limit connections on per file basis
I host a server where the files on the server are licensed such that only one
user can access each file at any one time.
To clarify: There could be 100 files on the server, and each file can only
ever be read by one user.
I'm trying to find a way of either allowing only 1 TCP connection per file,
or perhaps forcing a read-lock on every file opened such that no other users
can access a file