similar to: configured solr - question 2

user attempts to create folders with / dovecot naturally cannot create it so it returns error but outlook of course "create" it and keep data in local store only. data is lost when you remove local store .pst file. The question is - can dovecot be configured so it will automatically replace slash in name with something else?

I tell users to limit the folder characters to /0-9a-zA-Z_/, because anything else may upset a mail client or server. As I have no control over their minds, hands, and client software, I wish I could enforce the policy from the server, returning an error message to the client. On its turn, this requires the client to listen to such server messages, operated by a smarter user. At the end of the

i use solr fts indexing. It worls very well but it have one database per system, not per user. Lets suppose i delete one or more e-mail users in system. How to remove them in solr database to reclaim space?

I think we need a public compliance test, similar to html and ssl, then people would start questioning the quality of their own client, and migrate to better ones. When Micro$oft will eventually feel the pinch, then they will start fixing their $hit. People have the power! (I like that song.) On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 09:59, Wojciech Puchar <wojtek at puchar.net> wrote: >> >> As I

> On 29 September 2018 at 10:05 Rupert Gallagher <ruga at protonmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > A similar problem occurs with "." > > Sent from ProtonMail Mobile > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 15:44, Wojciech Puchar <wojtek at puchar.net> wrote: > > > user attempts to create folders with / > > dovecot naturally cannot create it so

>On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 09:59, Wojciech Puchar <wojtek at puchar.net> wrote: >>> >>> As I have no control over their minds, hands, and client software, I wish >>> I could enforce the policy from the server, returning an error message to >>> the client. >>> >>> On its turn, this requires the client to listen to such server messages,

On 1/19/2020 3:31 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > i use solr fts indexing. It worls very well but it have one database per > system, not per user. > > Lets suppose i delete one or more e-mail users in system. > > How to remove them in solr database to reclaim space? I cannot say whether there is anything that you can do from the Dovecot side, but I can explain how to delete

> > As I have no control over?their minds, hands, and?client software, I wish I could enforce the policy from the server, returning an > error message to the client.? > > On its turn, this requires the client to listen to such?server messages, operated by?a smarter?user.? the problem with pseudomail pseudoprogram outlook is that it simply ignores error and shows folder created,

+1 A similar problem occurs with "." Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 15:44, Wojciech Puchar <wojtek at puchar.net> wrote: > user attempts to create folders with / > dovecot naturally cannot create it so it returns error but outlook of > course "create" it and keep data in local store only. data is lost when > you remove local store .pst

On 28 Sep 2018, at 16.44, Wojciech Puchar <wojtek at puchar.net> wrote: > > user attempts to create folders with / dovecot naturally cannot create it so it returns error but outlook of course "create" it and keep data in local store only. data is lost when you remove local store .pst file. > > The question is - can dovecot be configured so it will automatically

>> how to disable throttling (or better - put other limits) for 127.0.0.1? > > https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.3 - look for "Localhost Auth Penalty" > that's certainly this. but i am not an expert in this passdb system my current config is passdb { driver=passwd-file args= username_format=%Lu /usr/local/etc/dovecot/aliasy } passdb { driver = pam #

tested dovecot with solr. Works well. But it uses TCP connection between solr server and dovecot. Can it be password protected? I have other things than IMAP on the same server including remote users. i don't want them to be able to do mess.

i've upgraded dovecot on my server to 2.3.9 works properly but saslauthd that uses it for rimap authentication over 127.0.0.1 works SLOW. You need to wait 15-20 seconds before authentication. only imap login over 127.0.0.1 is slowed down, while over any other IP is quick. i had this problem with older version of dovecot but it was about adding login_trusted_networks = 127.0.0.1 but i

Hi all What is the best strategy to add another storage to an existing virtual mail system ? Move some domains to the new storage and create symlinks ? Switch to dovecot hashing ? But in this case what is the easy-east way to migrate ? Thanks for any suggestions or tips !

Hi Christian, may be the issue is related to this other post: http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2015-September/102094.html Anyway, what I can tell you is that for every? user account,? for every folders created after the last doveadm fts rescan for that user, dovecot does not invoke indexer. A new rescan fix the problem for all the folders created up to that moment. I was wondering if I was

* Wojciech Puchar, 16.12.19 18:04 >>> how to disable throttling (or better - put other limits) for 127.0.0.1? >> >> https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.3 - look for "Localhost Auth Penalty" >> > that's certainly this. > > but i am not an expert in this passdb system > > my current config is > [...] > > where

i use dovecot 2 under FreeBSD (dovecot2-2.2.15 compiled from ports). tried both with kqueue enabled or not. everything works very fast, EXCEPT fetching big mail. tried multiple clients (thunderbird on windows, alpine on the same server, alpine on other unix server connected by 1Gb/s LAN) and fetching peaks at 1MB/s. NO SSL! could you please point me where to search for a problem. hints:

Hi all I hope someone can help with this. I'm looking at setting up FTS on a Dovecot server which has some quite big pubic folders (100,000+ emails each) and would appreciate some info about how fts both Xapian and Solr works with public folders. As background of the folders can receive emails and I use a dummy user and an alias file to deliver them for example testfolder:???

Ok. Additional question : - for rescan : who is responsible for passing again the new email ? Is the Dovecot core sending again all the emails to index ? or the fts shall somehow access the mailbox and read all emails ? Wouldn't just be saying "delete all index and get_last_uid is now 0" the easy way ? or the fts must process all emails (and block the current thread as a mailbx

There is no point into a separate plugin, the purpose is to replace squat as the default fts (solr being a nightmare) On 2019-01-11 18:23, Aki Tuomi wrote: > I would recommend making this a standalone plugin for now instead of trying to keep it in core fts. > > Aki > >> On 11 January 2019 at 18:40 Joan Moreau via dovecot < dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >>