similar to: Dovecot 2.3.9 fails on FreeBSD

On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 12:19:35 -0500, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek via dovecot wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 18:06:58 +0100, Pascal Christen via dovecot wrote: > > Hi > > > > I've just tried to build the latest Dovecot 2.3.9 on FreeBSD 11.3. > > Without success...It fails on the following commit which was introduced > > in 2.3.9: > >

I'm working on the port as we type. I've already done this patch (will add the comments). On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 11:29 AM Josef 'Jeff' Sipek via dovecot < dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 12:19:35 -0500, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek via dovecot > wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 18:06:58 +0100, Pascal Christen via dovecot > wrote:

On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 18:06:58 +0100, Pascal Christen via dovecot wrote: > Hi > > I've just tried to build the latest Dovecot 2.3.9 on FreeBSD 11.3. > Without success...It fails on the following commit which was introduced > in 2.3.9: > https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/c85f1bc3ce612c736c9d2c468cc08306db1b5851 > > Following output is the build log:

On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 18:06:58 +0100, Pascal Christen via dovecot stated: >Hi > >I've just tried to build the latest Dovecot 2.3.9 on FreeBSD 11.3. >Without success...It fails on the following commit which was introduced >in 2.3.9: >https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/c85f1bc3ce612c736c9d2c468cc08306db1b5851 > >Following output is the build log:

He's the maintainer ;) > The official FreeBSD ports system does not even have the Dovecot 2.3.9 > port available yet. I think it is a little premature to start making > changes or modifications until the port maintainer has had a chance to > avail himself of the problem, if one exists. >

I have a ss20 running Solaris 2.6 (and gcc 3.2) in which I want to install tinc. So, I run the configure script, ./configure --build=sparc-sun-solaris2.6 --host=sparc-sun-solaris2.6 --target=sparc-sun-solaris2.6 --with-openssl-include=/usr/local/ssl/include --with-openssl-lib=/usr/local/ssl/lib --with-zlib-include=/usr/local/include --with-zlib-lib=/usr/local/lib which seems to have run

Description: getnameinfo() (confirmed for CVS version 1.14.2.1) does this sort of buffer size checks (these is just two of many cases): if (strlen(sp->s_name) > servlen) return ENI_MEMORY; strcpy(serv, sp->s_name); ... if (strlen(hp->h_name) > hostlen) {

I could not find this question anywhere, but I apologize if it is and I just missed it. Running an Alpha, OSF1 V5.1 1885 configure went fine. compile failed: cc -I. -I. -g -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I./popt -c lib/getaddrinfo.c -o lib/getaddrinfo.o cc: Error: lib/getaddrinfo.c, line 182: In this statement, "EAI_MAX" is not declared. (undeclared) if (ecode < 0 || ecode > EAI_MAX)

Full_Name: Dr. Wolfgang Christen Version: 1.62 OS: Windows 2000 Submission from: (NULL) (141.20.76.99) I have a matrix of 705 x 999 elements and would like to save the data to a file using the follwing line: write.matrix ( format ( U1r, digits = 15 ), file = "C:\\Documents and Settings\\Administrator\\My Documents\\R\\plot-u2-2.txt" ) Then I had to find out that only 195 (out of 705)

Trying to build rsync 2.6.0 on Solaris 8 (gcc 3.3.2) has revealed that some of the EAI_ defines exist on Solaris, but not all of them. This causes lib/getaddrinfo.c to fail compilation as EAI_MAX (and some others) is undefined. The patch below fixes this issue, but I haven't tested the specific error conditions represented by the defines. Bryan --- lib/addrinfo.h.orig 2001-12-05

A Rails 2.3.9 app with Active Record or Memcache session store will never send the session ID cookie to a client if the client doesn''t send any HTTP cookies in its requests. Rails integration tests didn''t catch this because they always send the HTTP_COOKIE header, even if it''s empty. This is a huge bug, as it can break keeping sessions on sites which don''t set

Hi I tried to get some logs: https://pastebin.com/Z8xVzpzW As you can see the process isn't shutdown and still in transaction as long dovecot is running. It destroyed the transaction when I stopped Dovecot. And this behavior only happens when the mailbox of user is full... Any Ideas how to debug this correctly? > So far, I haven't been able to reproduce anything weird at this end.

Hi Stephan We tried it again last week with the latest dovecot version and still having the same issue. The whole setup works perfectly fine with the latest version of dovecot 2.2 The problem only exists if the quota of the user is full, every other message gets delivered without a problem, and the lmtp process change back to READY state. But in this case, it stays in the "RCPT TO? forever.

Hello, since the upgrade from 2.3.8 to 2.3.9 (using the Ubuntu 18.04 packages from dovecot.org), lmtp crashes for me for some mails. Currently I have three pending mails in my postfix deferred queue since the upgrade a couple of days ago. I did not observe these issues with 2.3.8. The backtrace from one of the coredumps: Reading symbols from /usr/lib/dovecot/lmtp...Reading symbols from

Dear R-users, I wondered if anyone has extended GLMMGibbs to include correlated random effects, and if so, whether they would be willing to let me use their code? Jonathan Myles has no plans to extend glmm in this manner within the foreseeable future. With thanks, Patty -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assoc Prof Patty Solomon

Hallo Aki, the affected code location seems to be concerned with parsing to ?To:? header. I checked all the mails causing the crash, the To: header is either empty (but present) or contains ?undisclosed-recipients:;?. I checked this manually and sure enough lmtp crashes: nc -C -U dovecot-lmtp 220 keira.mike2k.de Dovecot

Hi We tried to update our Dovecot Director-Ring to 2.3 (latest version) and had one problem/bug. When we try to deliver an email from Exim to a receiving Dovecot (2.3 latest) via the LMTP-Proxy the LMTP process stays open forever and never closes. So after a few hours, we hit the LMPT-Process limit.? The problem only exists if the receiving Dovecot reports "Quota exceeded (mailbox for user

Hi, the following patches are in the NetBSD packages collection to get OpenSSH 1.2.2 going. Changes: * /dev/urandom may be there but not in the kernel - make sure * Pull in some more headers needed by configure * Add proper ld-flags for ELF platforms * Some code cleanup * Install example files always to a different dir, and use out build system to DTRT WRT getting them to /etc.

Hi Aki, first thanks for the quick fix. Unfortunately, it only resolves the issue partially. For the ?To: undisclosed-recipients:;?, it works now. For ?To: ? it still crashes (i. e. what I did with my manual lmtp dialog). Michael > On 13. Dec 2019, at 11:54, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > > Hi! > > We have released v2.3.9.1 fixing this issue. >

Hello! I'm hoping that Gmail won't HTML format this mail so that I'll get flamed :) Anyway, my question relates to ssh_config. The problem I find is that the Host pattern is only applied to the argument given on the command line, as outlined in the man page: "The host is the hostname argument given on the command line (i.e. the name is not converted to a canonicalized host name