similar to: ITERINDEX not showing subfolders.

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "ITERINDEX not showing subfolders."

2017 Oct 16
2
Question about ITERINDEX in 2.2.32
On 16.10.2017 13:30, Mar?a Arrea wrote: > El 16/10/17 a las 12:25, Aki Tuomi escribi?: >> ITERINDEX is a flag, it's not supposed to have any value. >> >> Aki > So ITERINDEX=yes should be the right value? This is the right > mail_location settings? > >
2017 Oct 16
2
Question about ITERINDEX in 2.2.32
ITERINDEX is a flag, it's not supposed to have any value. Aki On 16.10.2017 13:22, Mar?a Arrea wrote: > > ??? I have tested putting the same value in ITERINDEX & INDEX, is this > the expected? > > ??? Regards > > ??? Mar?a > > El 07/09/17 a las 08:44, Mar?a Arrea escribi?: >> Hello >> >> ??? I have a question about the new setting ITERINDEX.
2017 Sep 07
2
Question about ITERINDEX in 2.2.32
Hello I have a question about the new setting ITERINDEX. This is my filesystem layout /indices_dovecot : 8 x Fast SSD drives /buzones : 32x SAS 10k rpm disks /buzones/alternativo : 24 x SAS 7.2k rpm slow disks This is my mail_location: mail_location =
2018 Apr 16
2
[bug] Auth cache, proxy and ITERINDEX
Hi, today we have exceprienced really major difficulties with our proxy backend servers. Everything started after enabling auth cache: auth_cache_size = 100M auth_cache_verify_password_with_worker = yes auth_cache_ttl = 1 hour auth_cache_negative_ttl = 1 hour Soon after we start receiving lots of calls from our customers about 'missing all e-mail messages'. This was in errors logs on
2017 Oct 16
0
Question about ITERINDEX in 2.2.32
Thank you Mr. Aki ??? Should this info about ITERINDEX be present in https://wiki.dovecot.org/MailLocation ? Bit confusing now. El 16/10/17 a las 12:35, Aki Tuomi escribi?: > > On 16.10.2017 13:30, Mar?a Arrea wrote: >> El 16/10/17 a las 12:25, Aki Tuomi escribi?: >>> ITERINDEX is a flag, it's not supposed to have any value. >>> >>> Aki >> So
2017 Oct 16
0
Question about ITERINDEX in 2.2.32
El 16/10/17 a las 12:25, Aki Tuomi escribi?: > ITERINDEX is a flag, it's not supposed to have any value. > > Aki So ITERINDEX=yes should be the right value? This is the right mail_location settings? mail_location=mdbox:/buzones/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:ITERINDEX=yes:INDEX=/indices_dovecot/indices/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:ALT=/buzones/alternativo/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n > >
2017 Oct 16
0
Question about ITERINDEX in 2.2.32
??? I have tested putting the same value in ITERINDEX & INDEX, is this the expected? ??? Regards ??? Mar?a El 07/09/17 a las 08:44, Mar?a Arrea escribi?: > Hello > > ??? I have a question about the new setting ITERINDEX. This is my > filesystem layout > > ??? /indices_dovecot : 8 x Fast SSD drives > ??? /buzones : 32x SAS 10k rpm disks > ??? /buzones/alternativo
2011 Oct 10
1
To query two SQL tables for user verification over LMTP, should I use (a) two separate lookups? or (b) just one lookup with a boolean query?
Hey all I've been running a Dovecot 1X server for awhile. Most of the config was pretty simple using flat files. I'm switching to Dovecot 2X now, and want to switch to using SQL for lookups so I can share info with the Postfix front end. For starters I setup two SIMPLE SQL tables -- a 'users' table and a 'aliases' table, where each user can have many aliases. I want to
2017 Aug 24
1
v2.2.32 released
https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.32.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.32.tar.gz.sig Two more fixes since rc2. And repeating: There are various changes in this release that can be used to significantly reduce disk IO with: 1) NFS storage especially, but I guess also other remote filesystems and even some with local disks 2) When mail storage and INDEX storage are
2017 Aug 24
1
v2.2.32 released
https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.32.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.32.tar.gz.sig Two more fixes since rc2. And repeating: There are various changes in this release that can be used to significantly reduce disk IO with: 1) NFS storage especially, but I guess also other remote filesystems and even some with local disks 2) When mail storage and INDEX storage are
2018 Apr 16
0
[bug] Auth cache, proxy and ITERINDEX
Hi, please post your doveconf -n Sami > On 16 Apr 2018, at 20.17, azurit at pobox.sk wrote: > > Hi, > > today we have exceprienced really major difficulties with our proxy backend servers. Everything started after enabling auth cache: > auth_cache_size = 100M > auth_cache_verify_password_with_worker = yes > auth_cache_ttl = 1 hour > auth_cache_negative_ttl = 1 hour
2017 Aug 16
1
v2.2.32 release candidate released
Timo Sirainen wrote: > There are various changes in this release that can be used to significantly reduce disk IO with: > 1) NFS storage especially, but I guess also other remote filesystems and even some with local disks > 2) When mail storage and INDEX storage are separated Thanks for these changes! Big win for my setup. My servers are not overly stressed, but how much performance
2017 Dec 13
2
Error: stat no such file or directory with 2.2.33.2
??? We have upgraded today from Dovecot 2.2.31 to Dovecot 2.2.33.2 and modified our config to include ITERINDEX in mail_location and we are detecting some errors like this: /Dec 13 08:17:31 buzon_rhel7 dovecot: imap(rboloix): Error: stat(/buzones/location/18/48/rboloix/mailboxes/SIT - Pra&AwE-cticas 2014/dbox-Mails) failed: No such file or directory// //Dec 13 08:40:24 buzon_rhel7
2013 Jul 31
1
[PATCH] sysprep: rhn_systemid: delete osad-auth.conf file in RHN
From 3d321e22fc34f828fdc9cb7a0f503d1bdcf982c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicholas Strugnell <nstrug@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:24:20 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] sysprep: rhn_systemid: delete osad-auth.conf file in RHN configuration --- sysprep/sysprep_operation_rhn_systemid.ml | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/sysprep/sysprep_operation_rhn_systemid.ml
2017 Jul 28
2
Help - rsync runs from command line, fails from task scheduler, hangs at msg checking charset: UTF-8
Setting up a new system backup (done several before and they all work fine). Windows 10 x64 (cygwin with rsync version 3.1.2) backing up to ubuntu server 16.04 (rsync 3.1.1). Run test.bat from command window (run as administrator) and it runs fine.Created scheduled task that runs test.bat and it hangs at "msg checking charset: UTF-8" until the timeout. I have upped the timeout to
2010 May 14
1
[PATCH] Use RHN to retrieve replacement packages
For guests registered with Red Hat Network, this patch allows for the conversion process to use RHN to download appropriate kernel package and its dependencies. We use yum on RHEL-5, up2date libraries on RHEL-4. We install matching kernel version whenever possible, latest available kernel version otherwise. _discover_kernel routine has been extended to return version-release of the default
2012 Apr 06
2
[PATCH] virt-sysprep:add logging feature
Hi Rich, I tried to implement the logging feature, but I can't though compiling with this patch now, could you please give me some comments? The error message is below, --- ocamlfind ocamlopt -g -warn-error CDEFLMPSUVYZX -package unix -I ../src/.libs -I ../ocaml -c sysprep_operation.ml -o sysprep_operation.cmx File "sysprep_operation.ml", line 1, characters 0-1: Error: The
2016 Oct 04
0
Re: [Bug 1381502] virt-sparsify doesn't remove content of deleted files on XFS
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 02:36:53PM +0000, MUCHOWSKI, Piotr (EXT - PL) wrote: > Good afternoon Richard, > > Just one question about "--scrub" option. Can the "scrub mode" be > enabled globally (not just for single FILE after this option)? > Preferably for all sysprep items where some files are deleted. For > example logfiles rh-subscription-manager rhn-systemid
2019 Apr 12
2
Mailbox INBOX: Opening INBOX failed: Mailbox doesn't exist: INBOX. Maybe master user + namespace problem?
2017 Aug 17
1
v2.2.32 release candidate released
Timo Sirainen wrote: Thanks for the reply -- I think I can now write a new config to test these tasty features out. >>> + mail_location can now include NO-NOSELECT parameter. This >>> automatically deletes any \NoSelect mailboxes that have no children. >>> These mailboxes are sometimes confusing to users. >> >> Sorry for my IMAP ignorance, but how can