similar to: Sieve redirect

Hi Louis, Bj?rn and Rowland, Am 30.04.2015 um 08:09 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle: > Please read the reported bug and bjorn answer.. which does not help any to a solution of fix, or explenation. > But the big question now is, does someone somewhere know what bjorn is talking about. > > i did search for "gencache" but no go here.. > just from old documentation. >

On 30/04/15 07:09, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > Please read the reported bug and bjorn answer.. which does not help any to a solution of fix, or explenation. > But the big question now is, does someone somewhere know what bjorn is talking about. > > i did search for "gencache" but no go here.. > just from old documentation. >

( sorry for mailing directly bjorn, but please have a look ) I still think this is a bug.. why not a bug: If i do assign a UID/GID to a user, then yes, this wil work fine. new users and groups sure.. but now im talking about the default domain groups.. why a bug: User administrator and the domain groups are set by default by samba. and its not consistant at all which is needed for a

regards Mathias Wohlfarth EDV-Beratung Thomas-Mann-Str.1 53111 Bonn Tel. +49 172 / 53 45 591 +49 1801 / 777 555 33 01 Fax +49 228 / 9469181 Email mathias.wohlfarth@mw-eb.de ----- Weitergeleitet von Mathias am 21.01.2005 10:40 ----- Mathias.Wohlfarth@mw-eb.de Gesendet von: samba-bounces+mathias.wohlfarth=mw-eb.de@lists.samba.org 19.01.2005 17:35 An: Bj?rn-Sverre N?ttum

I have four SLES 10 servers working as Samba servers on the same domain with an LDAP account backend. Relevant smb.conf entries are: [global] workgroup = UNIX realm = UNIX.UIB.NO server string = ukl-samba netbios name = ukl-samba security = user allow trusted domains = yes domain master = yes local master = yes encrypt

Dear SSH community, It has been brought to my attention that is has been disputed whether the term "SSH" can be used freely as a term to describe implementations compatible with the "SSH" protocols, due to trademark issues. In particular, the owner of the "SSH" trademark argues that implementations compatible with the "SSH" protocols shall no longer be

On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 09:33:08PM +0100, R. Diez wrote: > OK, so I gather that the Submission Server cannot do that (yet). And probably would never do. It isn't its job description. Actually, it is just a convenience/workaround feature, which comes handy only if your own MTA cannot handle dovecot's SASL authentication (must be something real strange) or there are some

Please read the reported bug and bjorn answer.. which does not help any to a solution of fix, or explenation. But the big question now is, does someone somewhere know what bjorn is talking about. i did search for "gencache" but no go here.. just from old documentation. https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/tdb.html gencache.tdb Generic caching database.

On 12/05/2018 06:57 PM, admin (@awib.it) wrote: > I have a group alias (all at company.com). > (1) Only company.com accounts should be able to send an email to > everybody in that company via all at company.com. Do you have a means to identify "some suitable account was used" - as opposed to a trivially forged sender address - *other* than by watching the actual MUA-to-MSA

Hi @all, Can someone please just confirm me, that Samba doesn't remove a directory in case of a "SET_FILE_INFO"-Request for this directory? The following abstract is out of an Ethereal-Log and shows a SET-FILE-INFO-Request for a directory: ############################################################################ No. Time Source Destination

On 30/04/15 09:09, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > ( sorry for mailing directly bjorn, but please have a look ) > > I still think this is a bug.. > > why not a bug: > If i do assign a UID/GID to a user, then yes, this wil work fine. > new users and groups sure.. but now im talking about the default domain groups.. > > why a bug: > User administrator and the domain groups

??? Stephan, thank you very much for your hard work. I want to ask your opinion about jmap ( http://jmap.io/ ) , do you think is a viable alternative to current IMAP + MSA ? ??? Regards ??? Mar?a El 12/12/17 a las 00:14, Stephan Bosch escribi?: > Hi, > > As some of you know, I started implementing the SMTP submission proxy a > few years ago. It acts as a front-end for any MTA,

Bj?rn, I would be very interested in looking at your data and the R file. Actually, I think a lot of people would. You might want to post it on a website... CB -----Original Message----- From: speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org [mailto:speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org] On Behalf Of Bj?rn Thalheim Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 4:43 AM To: speex-dev@xiph.org Subject: [Speex-dev] Distances in codebook

Ouss a ?crit : > Hello, > > Is it possible to adjust the level of the denoiser ? Not for now. > In an old beta, before you change the aggressiveness of the denoiser, it > works very well with the noise of a car, a road etc... but not now. When did that change? > The AEC too works very well in a old beta, but now, I think there is a > problem... When did that change?

Hello, Is it possible to adjust the level of the denoiser ? In an old beta, before you change the aggressiveness of the denoiser, it works very well with the noise of a car, a road etc... but not now. The AEC too works very well in a old beta, but now, I think there is a problem... I have tested it with the same sound card (WB 16000). In any case, your project is the best VOIP library in this

Hello Mailinglist, I still have the problem, which is described in my first and second post with this topic, that i sometimes can't delete directories on the Samba-Server from WinXP machines. I can't send my Ethereal-Logs to the list, but i send them to Jeremy, who never answered me anyway. If anyone can help me or would like to see the Ethereal-Logs, with the fact, that Windows

Hello, The denoiser was good with a car noise or a raod noise before the r11739. But for some situation, the actual version is perfect. That's why I think that if we can adjust the agressivity of the denoiser, we can respond to all of the situations. Maybe two parameters should be enough : high or low. For the AEC, I have to test with older versions because it's another person that

hello list! I am attempting to build an rpm of postfix that includes support for mysql. I've done this before with earlier versions on postfix but I am staring at this spec file until my eyes bleed and I just don't see why when I build the spec with rpmbuild mysql support isn't there. After I install the rpm I have a look at the modules as such: ldd $(which postfix) | grep -i

Building OpenSSH 4.2p1 with the hpn11-none patch, HP-UX 11.23 64-bits ia64, using openssl-0.9.7g compiled from source. Using gcc 4.0.2 from the HP software depot, compilation is uneventful (but fast!) once configuration is set up, but make tests fail with Disconnected messages: Disconnected: bad packet length ... (varying) Write failed: Broken pipe ssh -2 failed with mac hmac-sja1 cipher

Hello everyone, I tried to configure sendmail so that I can use mail() in php. I don't host my email server, my ISP does. I just want to configure sendmail so that it uses external email server (my ISP) to send mail. When I executed mail(), i got no error report from php. I checked /var/log/maillog and it indicated that the message was accepted for delivery. However, it didn't