similar to: Autosubscribe to public folder

Hello All, I try to set up a read only maildir just as in the wiki, to no avail. The extra (public) namespace shows up but I can not susbscribe to it (in thunderbird) or if I change to that "directory" (in mutt), it is empty. Is it the problem mentioned in the wiki (SharedMailboxes#Subscriptions)? If yes, how can I see/use a folder which is not subscribeable? Any help would be

Newbie alert! Dovecot 2.0rc3 I've got autosubscribe working very well, but I need to make it dependent on the domain - e.g. domain example.com will have folders (a,b,c), while domain example2.com will have (d,e,f). Any hints on how to achieve that? /Per Jessen, Z?rich

Hi all, I have changed my imap server from courier to dovecot, Now i am facing problem to subscribe the existing mail folder after change of imap server by default they are showing in the unsubscribe folder list, is there any command or mechanism in dovecot to subscribe all the folder. i am using maildir format to store mail. Thanks & Regards. Munga (System Engginer) -- Click for

Hi, I just ran across the annoying issue, that with lda_mailbox_autocreate = yes lda_mailbox_autosubscribe = yes set, parent folders of newly created subfolders get subscribed without being existent. Let me give an example: In sieve I use fileinto "foo/bar"; but "foo/" does not exist as folder. So the Mailbox "foo/bar" gets created, but without "foo/"

Hi! I've installed samba 4.7.4 with options. All works fine except winbind. The command getent and id don't return ad users. What's the problem? ./configure --prefix=/opt/samba --libdir=/lib64 --with-piddir=/run/samba --with-pammodulesdir=/lib64/security --enable-fhs --without-ad-dc --enable-selftest

Hi All, I have made changes in clang side and llvm side for one ticket. How can I submit two patches(clang patch and llvm patch) for review ? Can I submit two patches in single revision or have to submit separate and tag them both? Could any one please give your suggestions. Thanks & Regards, Ramakota. IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential

I've added a patch, temporarily using the name Chris suggested. Please let me know what you think. https://reviews.llvm.org/D60291 thanks... don On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 2:55 PM David Greene <dag at cray.com> wrote: > Don Hinton <hintonda at gmail.com> writes: > > > > if (isa_or_null<T>(var)) { > > > ... > > > } > > > >

I'm not sure how much more simple I can make this but I just cannot seem to get my Asterisk 13 to accept a connection on the manager interface: --- manager.conf --- [general] enabled = yes port = 5038 bindaddr = 127.0.0.1 [myasterisk] secret=a permit=0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 read = all write = all So, couldn't be any more wide open and simpler to connect yet: # echo -e "Action:

As I understand it, delays like this are almost always caused by slow or failing DNS lookups. Running a packet capture on all interfaces filtering on port 53 shows no DNS traffic leaving the server. I have ensured that there is a DNS record for the server & that it can resolve it. I've also added records to my hosts file and checked using 'genet ahosts hostname' but still the issue

Attached are the Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results for current llvm/dragonegg svn on x86_64-apple-darwin11 built against Xcode 4.3.2 and FSF gcc 4.6.3. The benchmarks for -msse3 and -msse4 appear identical (at least for degg+optnz). This is fortunate since there seems to be a bug in -msse4 on 2.33 GHz (T7600) Intel Core 2 Duo Merom (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12434).

Hi Jack >               dragonegg degg+vectorize degg+optnz  gfortran > ac               12.45       12.45         8.85       8.80 > gas_dyn          11.72       11.80         4.47       4.26 > induct           24.02       24.91        12.08      13.65 > rnflow           32.25       32.35        26.47      24.06 Any idea what might cause such differences here? -- With best

Sorry, should have included that. Asterisk 16.2.1 Mark. On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 14:56, Joshua C. Colp <jcolp at digium.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019, at 10:53 AM, Mark Farmer wrote: > > As I understand it, delays like this are almost always caused by slow > > or failing DNS lookups. Running a packet capture on all interfaces > > filtering on port 53 shows no DNS

Seems to be res_resolver_unbound.so Reading the documentation now but any hints greatly appreciated! Mark. On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 15:07, Joshua C. Colp <jcolp at digium.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019, at 11:03 AM, Mark Farmer wrote: > > Sorry, should have included that. > > > > Asterisk 16.2.1 > > And what res_resolver module is loaded and in use? Depending

On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 6:29 PM Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: > There are a handful of places in LLVM that dosomething like if > (dyn_cast_or_null<UndefValue>(P->hasConstantValue())) > Yes, I've seen those, but while working on a new checker, I was advised that replacing `X && isa<Y>(X)` with `dyn_cast_or_null<Y>(X)` was

Hi, compiler-rt builtins currently doesn't build on MSVC 2019, I the problem is that compiler-rt\lib\builtins\int_math.h includes the header ymath.h. according to eg. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/c-runtime-library/reference/finite-finitef?view=vs-2019 the header to include is float.h also the ymath.h file contains the comment /* ymath.h internal header */ so probably shall not be

Thanks, I did enable debugging but didn't see any attempts to resolve hostnames. I will give it another look. I did have an empty resolver_unbound.conf (not even a general context) - would that likely cause issues? I would expect the defaults to kick in but I have now added: [general] hosts=system I will retest/debug when ASAP. Mark. On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 15:20, Joshua C. Colp <jcolp

On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 10:30 AM David Greene <dag at cray.com> wrote: > I don't think that's a correct replacement. > > if (var && isa<T>(var)) { > ... > } > > is not the same as: > > if (isa_or_null<T>(var)) { > ... > } > > at least according to what "isa_or_null" conveys to me. > This is the same

On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 7:10 PM Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: > Agreed that the new isa_or_null style is better. Just wanted mention the > other style so we know we should migrate those to the new one. > I have a checker under review that could be enhanced to do that -- though it currently replaces `X->foo() && isa<Y>(X->foo())` with

I'd like to propose adding `isa_or_null<>` to replace the following usage pattern that's relatively common in conditionals: var && isa<T>(var) =>> isa_or_null<T>(var) And in particular when `var` is a method call which might be expensive, e.g.: X->foo() && isa<T>(X->foo()) =>> isa_or_null<T>(X->foo()) The

On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:26:38AM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Jack, > >> Attached are the Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results for current llvm/dragonegg svn >> on x86_64-apple-darwin11 built against Xcode 4.3.2 and FSF gcc 4.6.3. > > thanks for the numbers. How does this compare to LLVM 3.0 - were there any > regressions? The results from just before