Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "CentOS Repository broken ?"
2019 Mar 29
1
CentOS Repository broken ?
or something has been cached, try: yum clean all and then yum update
> Am 29.03.2019 um 14:49 schrieb Gerald Galster via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>:
>
> Hello,
>
> can you please check if the dovecot repository is enabled?
> Is it mentioned at the top of the output when you do "yum update":
>
> (1/10): base/7/x86_64/group_gz
> (2/10):
2019 Mar 30
1
CentOS Repository broken ?
Hello,
All is correct on my system also a yum clean is make.
But the dovecot = 2.3.5.1-1 is MISSING on the repositories !!
Yum like to update to the new packages dovecot-lua and dovecot-imaptest but
can't found the latest passed dovecot Version 2.3.5.1-1
The packages dovecot-lua and dovecot-imaptes 2.3.5.1-1 are found but not the
dovecot version??
Am Freitag, 29. M?rz 2019, 14:49:29
2019 Mar 29
0
CentOS Repository broken ?
Hello,
can you please check if the dovecot repository is enabled?
Is it mentioned at the top of the output when you do "yum update":
(1/10): base/7/x86_64/group_gz
(2/10): updates/7/x86_64/primary_db
...
Verf?gbar / available:
> Verf?gbar: 1:dovecot-2.2.36-3.el7.i686 (base)
There should be something available from the dovecot-2.3-latest repo.
Or try: yum update
2019 Mar 30
2
CentOS Repository broken ?
> Am 30.03.2019 um 00:06 schrieb Peter via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>:
>
> On 30/03/19 1:31 AM, G?nther J. Niederwimmer via dovecot wrote:
>> I have a CentOS 7 server with dovecot Repository enabled.
>> But it is not possible to Update with Yum Update
>> I have this Error?
>> The dovecot package is missing?
>> Fehler: Paket:
2013 Jan 27
1
GPOs don't work after update from Samba4.0 alpha 17 to 4.0.1
Hi!
I have updated our server from Samba 4 alpha 17 to Samba 4.0.1.
Everything seems to work fine after some reconfiguration, but our
GPOs are not working anymore.
Samba 4 alpha 17 was using ntvfs and the root partition with the sysvol share was mounted with "user_xattr" only in /etc/fstab.
Samba 4.0.1 is now set to use s3fs and the root partition is mouted with
2019 Dec 02
4
Debian Stretch - > buster: samba packages
On 02/12/2019 10:07, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote:
> Am 02.12.19 um 08:47 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba:
>> Hai,
>>
>> Sorry for the late reply.
> Never mind, weekend is important ...
>
>> Here its just apt-get distupgrade --autoremove --purge
>> Without the autoremove libldb1 is not removed so libldb2 can be installed.
> # apt-get distupgrade
2010 Feb 16
3
Installation SerNet Samba Build Key 1.0.2 failed
As the SerNet Samba Build key will expire soon, I wanted to install the
new key with the extended validity:
http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/sernet-build-key-1.0-2.noarch.rpm
But the installation on a CentOS 5.3 failed with dependencies:
Fehler: Fehlgeschlagende Abh?ngigkeiten:
rpmlib(PayloadIsLzma) <= 4.4.6-1 wird ben?tigt von
sernet-build-key-1.0-2.noarch
Any suggestions??
2015 Nov 23
2
Cannot access Patriot Pro II from new system
Hi list,
on my previous (lenny or squeeze) machine, I had it up and running, but
that machine and configs are gone - and on my new jessie machine (see
device and config details below) I cannot start the driver:
# /lib/nut/bestups -DDDDD -a Patriot_Pro_II_750
0.000000 debug level is '5'
0.000806 send_to_all: SETINFO device.type "ups"
0.000842 send_to_all:
2018 Jun 18
2
Problem with Ubuntu bionic R 3.5
Hi Michael.
I fear I'm becoming a pain in your back. Sorry.
The problem with the "Components" and "Suite" name in the "InRelease"
file for bionic-cran35 has been solved. *Many thanks for that.* However,
"sudo apt-get install r-base" creates an error message (again here the
German version):
ulrich at linuxdesktop:~$ sudo apt-get install r-base
2012 Mar 26
1
lib-problem
I have a CentOS 6.2 Desktop-Version (my Laptop). I have install remmina
via rpm and want now install a plugin (rpd).
I have download the pluging from:
http://pkgs.org/centos-6-rhel-6/russian-fedora-free-i386/remmina-plugins-rdp-0.9.2-5.el6.R.i686.rpm.html
But now my system is missing 3 libraries. The freerdp.i686,
freerdp-devel.i686, freerdp-libs.i686 and freerdp-plugins.i686 from epel
are
2018 Jun 16
2
Problem with Ubuntu bionic R 3.5
Ulrich,
On 16 June 2018 at 15:04, Ulrich Leuchtmann wrote:
| Hi Dirk.
|
| I saw you installed a new release. Unfortunately the problem mentioned
| below does persist.
The Ubuntu side of things is mostly Michael's work.
| I know this is perhaps a minor issue, as users report they can install
| manually (see below). But under strict installation policies this can
| create an issue.
2013 Jun 10
1
Rcmdr seit heute nicht mehr ladbar
Wenn man ihn mal braucht ist er tot. folgende Fehlermeldung ereilt mich seit heute beim starten des R Commander auf dem Mac:
> library(Rcmdr)
Lade n?tiges Paket: car
Lade n?tiges Paket: MASS
Lade n?tiges Paket: nnet
Error : .onAttach in attachNamespace() f?r 'Rcmdr' fehlgeschlagen, Details:
? Aufruf: structure(.External(.C_dotTclObjv, objv), class = "tclObj")
? Fehler: [tcl]
2014 Feb 02
4
xorriso or genisoimage syntax assistance
I got this figured out much faster than I thought I would. Thanks to all of
your help, Peter, Mattias, Thomas and Helmut. And Thomas, that 8 partition
live OS sounds right up my alley, and I will definitely check it out.
The second partition is working well with `parted' and `fdisk', so I am
quite pleased. Below is, again, "what I came up with". I tried to integrate
each of your
2019 Mar 31
2
CentOS Repository broken ?
Hello,
Am Samstag, 30. M?rz 2019, 21:36:12 CEST schrieb Peter via dovecot:
> On 30/03/19 10:56 PM, Gerald Galster via dovecot wrote:
> > Maybe there is something wrong with his local yum/repo configuration.
>
> I'm tending to agree now.
>
> > CentOS 7 usually doesn't mix 32bit and 64bit packages anymore.
> >
> > Installiert: 2:dovecot-2.3.5-1.x86_64
2019 Mar 29
0
CentOS Repository broken ?
On 30/03/19 1:31 AM, G?nther J. Niederwimmer via dovecot wrote:
> I have a CentOS 7 server with dovecot Repository enabled.
>
> But it is not possible to Update with Yum Update
> I have this Error?
> The dovecot package is missing?
>
> Fehler: Paket: 2:dovecot-imaptest-2.3.5.1-1.x86_64 (dovecot-2.3-latest)
> Ben?tigt: dovecot = 2:2.3.5.1-1
>
2019 Dec 02
1
Debian Stretch - > buster: samba packages
On 02/12/2019 10:51, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote:
> Am 02.12.19 um 11:43 schrieb Rowland penny via samba:
>> On 02/12/2019 10:07, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote:
>>> Am 02.12.19 um 08:47 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba:
>>>> Hai,
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for the late reply.
>>> Never mind, weekend is important ...
>>>
2006 Apr 18
2
installation of package "randomForest" failed
Hello
I'd like to try out some functions in the package randomForest. Therefore,
I did install this package. However, it is not possible to load the
library, although I have R-Version 2.1.1 (i.e. later than 2.0.0). The
commands I used and the Answers/Error from R is as follows:
>
install.packages("C://Programme//R//rw2011//library//randomForest_4.5-16.zip",
2019 Mar 30
0
CentOS Repository broken ?
On 30/03/19 10:56 PM, Gerald Galster via dovecot wrote:
> Maybe there is something wrong with his local yum/repo configuration.
I'm tending to agree now.
> CentOS 7 usually doesn't mix 32bit and 64bit packages anymore.
>
> Installiert: 2:dovecot-2.3.5-1.x86_64 (Installiert = installed) -> dovecot-2.3.5-1 is already installed as a 64bit package (this is an epoch 2 package
2010 Nov 20
1
installimg fBasics SuSe 11.3 64bit
Hello,
I've been trying to install the fBasics package on an openSuSe 11.3
64bit machine.
It gives an error saying:
WARNING: *R* *include* *directory* *is* *empty* -- *perhaps* *need* *to*
*install* *R*-*devel*.*rpm* *or* similar
Yet, R-devel is installed. Other packages work fine. I also tried
different ways to install...install.packages() and R CMD INSTALL...
The complete message is
2014 Dec 29
5
samba_dlz Failed to configure reverse zone
Dear Roland,
and here we have one reasons / prove regarding Debian and current Samba BIND DLZ issues :
http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/b/bind9/bind9_9.8.4.dfsg.P1-6+nmu2+deb7u3_changelog
MSG >> " * disable dlz until we get a patch to make it build again"
Well Debian Maintainers seems seeking missing the dlz patches that RHEL & SLES maintainers created