Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "Perl Net::Doveadm"
2019 Jan 16
0
doveadm neglecting to exit in failure?
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
Yeah. except in this particular case where it doesn't actually matter. Your expunge went thru.
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Aki
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
On 15
2019 Jan 15
2
doveadm neglecting to exit in failure?
-----
cpssltest at cpanelssltest.org [/usr/local/cpanel]# doveadm -v expunge -u cpssltest -- mailbox-guid b8a359119e771b58484a0000a841250d savedbefore 365days; echo $?
doveadm(cpssltest): Error: net_connect_unix(/var/run/dovecot/stats-writer) failed: Permission denied
0
-----
^^ In the above, shouldn?t the ?doveadm? command have exited nonzero to indicate a failure to connect?
Thanks!
-Felipe
2018 Oct 31
1
OCSP Stapling and Certificate Transparency
On 05/01/2018 09:08 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
>> On 01 May 2018 at 19:03 Felipe Gasper < felipe at felipegasper.com
>> <mailto:felipe at felipegasper.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> For CAs that do not include a signed certificate timestamp in their
>> newly-issued certificates, does Dovecot support either OCSP stapling
>> or the
2018 May 01
2
OCSP Stapling and Certificate Transparency
Hi,
For CAs that do not include a signed certificate timestamp in their newly-issued certificates, does Dovecot support either OCSP stapling or the Certificate Transparency TLS extension?
If the TLS extension is supported, how does the admin configure the timestamp for each certificate?
I?m wondering if any MUAs will follow Google?s lead and insist on CT.
Thank you!
-Felipe Gasper
2018 May 01
0
OCSP Stapling and Certificate Transparency
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
On 01 May 2018 at 19:03 Felipe Gasper <
<a href="mailto:felipe@felipegasper.com">felipe@felipegasper.com</a>> wrote:
</div>
2019 Mar 12
1
Re: “doveadm mailbox” command fails with UTF-8 mailboxes
> On Mar 12, 2019, at 3:28 PM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On 12 March 2019 21:20 Felipe Gasper via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I?ve got a strange misconfiguration where the following command:
>>
>> doveadm -f pager mailbox status -u spamutf8 'messages vsize
2019 Mar 12
0
Re: “doveadm mailbox” command fails with UTF-8 mailboxes
> On 12 March 2019 21:20 Felipe Gasper via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I?ve got a strange misconfiguration where the following command:
>
> doveadm -f pager mailbox status -u spamutf8 'messages vsize guid' INBOX 'INBOX.*'
>
> ? fails with error code 68, saying that it can?t find one of the mailboxes. (It lists
2020 May 24
1
Re: missing man page for “doveadm dsync-server”?
> On May 24, 2020, at 2:58 PM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On 24/05/2020 21:56 Felipe Gasper <felipe at felipegasper.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there a man page for this command? I don?t see one in the repository. Given its utility in, e.g., syncing mailboxes via SSH, it seems like documentation
2019 Mar 12
6
“doveadm mailbox” command fails with UTF-8 mailboxes
Hello,
I?ve got a strange misconfiguration where the following command:
doveadm -f pager mailbox status -u spamutf8 'messages vsize guid' INBOX 'INBOX.*'
? fails with error code 68, saying that it can?t find one of the mailboxes. (It lists the user?s other mailboxes.) The name of the mailbox in question is saved to disk in UTF-8 rather than mUTF-7, but strace shows that doveadm
2020 May 24
0
Re: missing man page for “doveadm dsync-server”?
> On 24/05/2020 21:56 Felipe Gasper <felipe at felipegasper.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Is there a man page for this command? I don?t see one in the repository. Given its utility in, e.g., syncing mailboxes via SSH, it seems like documentation for this command would be useful?
>
> Thank you!
>
> -Felipe Gasper
Hi!
Man pages are in
2020 May 27
0
doveadm: extra lines?
I did a bit more digging, and the issue appears to manifest only when doveadm sends back an error code.
Here is a ?user? and a ?kick?, both of which fail with error codes:
> echo -ne 'VERSION\tdoveadm-server\t1\t0\nD\tharry\tuser\nD\t\tkick\tharry\n' | nc -U /var/run/dovecot/doveadm-server | xxd
0000000: 2b0a 0a2d 5553 4147 450a 0a2d 0a0a 2d4e +..-USAGE..-..-N
0000010: 4f54 464f 554e
2020 May 24
2
missing man page for “doveadm dsync-server”?
Hello,
Is there a man page for this command? I don?t see one in the repository. Given its utility in, e.g., syncing mailboxes via SSH, it seems like documentation for this command would be useful?
Thank you!
-Felipe Gasper
2020 May 26
2
doveadm: extra lines?
Hello,
I?m sending doveadm ?kick? commands to doveadm-server via the doveadm protocol. When ?kick? sends back a NOTFOUND error, though, it?s sending back additional output. strace shows:
write(3<UNIX:[3158354->3156665]>, "\t\tkick\tmyssltest\n", 17) = 17
...
read(3<UNIX:[3158354->3156665]>, "\n-NOTFOUND\n\n-\n", 8192) = 14
Going by the protocol
2016 Nov 11
0
lazy-load SNI?
On Friday 11 of November 2016, Felipe Gasper wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We?re rolling out large SNI deployments for our mail servers. Each domain
> gets an entry like this in the config:
>
> local_name mail.foo.com {
> ssl_cert = </ssl/domain_tls/*.foo.com/combined
> ssl_key = </ssl/domain_tls/*.foo.com/combined
> }
Lack of glob/regexp support here is also a
2016 Nov 11
1
lazy-load SNI?
> On November 11, 2016 at 12:22 PM Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz <arekm at maven.pl> wrote:
>
>
> On Friday 11 of November 2016, Felipe Gasper wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > We?re rolling out large SNI deployments for our mail servers. Each domain
> > gets an entry like this in the config:
> >
> > local_name mail.foo.com {
> > ssl_cert =
2018 Aug 23
0
Is the Doveadm HTTP API considered stable for production use?
> On Aug 23, 2018, at 8:14 AM, James Beck <james.beck at aa.net.uk> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 09:54:44AM -0400, Felipe Gasper wrote:
>> If you don?t want to use the HTTP API, you can use the raw doveadm protocol.
>>
>> https://wiki.dovecot.org/Design/DoveadmProtocol
>>
>> -FG
>
> Thanks, I didn't know about that. I suppose
2016 Nov 11
3
lazy-load SNI?
On 11.11.2016 12:22, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz wrote:
> On Friday 11 of November 2016, Felipe Gasper wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> We?re rolling out large SNI deployments for our mail servers. Each domain
>> gets an entry like this in the config:
>>
>> local_name mail.foo.com {
>> ssl_cert = </ssl/domain_tls/*.foo.com/combined
>> ssl_key =
2020 May 20
1
Re: dsync “destination” argument
> On May 20, 2020, at 10:46 AM, Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote:
>
>> On 16. May 2020, at 3.46, Felipe Gasper <felipe at felipegasper.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Some code that I didn?t write but am maintaining passes a local script?s path as dsync?s ?destination? argument, like so:
>>
>> dsync -D -u john -v backup
2018 Aug 23
2
Is the Doveadm HTTP API considered stable for production use?
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 09:54:44AM -0400, Felipe Gasper wrote:
> If you don?t want to use the HTTP API, you can use the raw doveadm protocol.
>
> https://wiki.dovecot.org/Design/DoveadmProtocol
>
> -FG
Thanks, I didn't know about that. I suppose testing the HTTP API and
then switching to the raw doveadm protocol over TCP if it turns out
"crashy" wouldn't mean
2018 Aug 23
2
Is the Doveadm HTTP API considered stable for production use?
On 23.08.18 15:35, Felipe Gasper wrote:
>
>> On Aug 23, 2018, at 8:14 AM, James Beck <james.beck at aa.net.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 09:54:44AM -0400, Felipe Gasper wrote:
>>> If you don?t want to use the HTTP API, you can use the raw doveadm protocol.
>>>
>>> https://wiki.dovecot.org/Design/DoveadmProtocol
>>>