similar to: [ceph-users] dovecot + cephfs - sdbox vs mdbox

Thanks Jack. That's good to know. It is definitely something to consider. In a distributed storage scenario we might build a dedicated pool for that and tune the pool as more capacity or performance is needed. Regards, Webert Lima DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia *Belo Horizonte - Brasil* *IRC NICK - WebertRLZ* On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 4:45 PM Jack <ceph at jack.fr.eu.org> wrote:

Hi, some time back we had similar discussions when we, as an email provider, discussed to move away from traditional NAS/NFS storage to Ceph. The problem with POSIX file systems and dovecot is that e.g. with mdbox only around ~20% of the IO operations are READ/WRITE, the rest are metadata IOs. You will not change this with using CephFS since it will basically behave the same way as e.g. NFS. We

I'm sending this message to both dovecot and ceph-users ML so please don't mind if something seems too obvious for you. Hi, I have a question for both dovecot and ceph lists and below I'll explain what's going on. Regarding dbox format (https://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox), when using sdbox, a new file is stored for each email message. When using mdbox, multiple

Hello Florent, How did you proceed with the upgrade? Did you follow the recommended steps guide to upgrade ceph? (mons first, then OSDs, then MDS) Did you interrupt dovecot before upgrading the MDS specially? Did you remount the filesystem? Did you upgrade the ceph client too? Give people the complete scene and someone might be able to help you. Ask on ceph-users list too. Regards, Webert

Hey Aki Tuomi, how are you doing? I have tried many ways for getting 2.2.35 pre-built installed via 'apt-get install' in Debian Jessie and Stretch using the official repos. The reason I prefer to install pre-built instead of compiling it is because the I run it on dockers, so it's a lot easier and automated to just apt-get install it. I was using 2.2.31 devel in Debian Jessie, I

Hi! 2.2.35 is not unstable, but apparently it is in debian distribution, which is called 'unstable'. Aki On 27.04.2018 06:16, Webert de Souza Lima wrote: > Got 2.2.34 running using debian strech image + strech-backports repos! > > > Regards, > > Webert Lima > DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia > *Belo Horizonte - Brasil* > *IRC NICK - WebertRLZ* > > On

Got 2.2.34 running using debian strech image + strech-backports repos! Regards, Webert Lima DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia *Belo Horizonte - Brasil* *IRC NICK - WebertRLZ* On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 9:37 PM, Webert de Souza Lima <webert.boss at gmail.com > wrote: > Oh thank you Cedric, I hadn't check that. So 2.2.35 is unstable, huh? > I'll deploy 2.2.34 instead. > >

Oh thank you Cedric, I hadn't check that. So 2.2.35 is unstable, huh? I'll deploy 2.2.34 instead. Thank you! Regards, Webert Lima DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia *Belo Horizonte - Brasil* *IRC NICK - WebertRLZ* On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 7:51 PM, Cedric M <cedric.malitte at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > did you check in unstable ? > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dovecot

Hi, did you check in unstable ? https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dovecot 2018-04-26 16:43 GMT-04:00 Webert de Souza Lima <webert.boss at gmail.com>: > hmm I think I should use stretch instead of jessie, OR I should use a > stretch-backport repos, right? > > > Regards, > > Webert Lima > DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia > *Belo Horizonte - Brasil* > *IRC NICK -

On Wed, 2024-07-31 at 08:36 +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > 31.07.2024 07:55, Anoop C S via samba wrote: > > On Tue, 2024-07-30 at 21:12 +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > Building current samba on debian bullseye with > > > > > > ??? ./configure --enable-cephfs > > > > > > results in

On Tue, 2024-07-30 at 21:12 +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > Hi! > > Building current samba on debian bullseye with > > ?? ./configure --enable-cephfs > > results in the following output: > > Checking for header cephfs/libcephfs.h????????????? : yes > Checking for library cephfs???????????????????????? : yes > Checking for ceph_statx in

31.07.2024 07:55, Anoop C S via samba wrote: > On Tue, 2024-07-30 at 21:12 +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Building current samba on debian bullseye with >> >> ?? ./configure --enable-cephfs >> >> results in the following output: >> >> Checking for header cephfs/libcephfs.h????????????? : yes >> Checking for

Hi! Building current samba on debian bullseye with ./configure --enable-cephfs results in the following output: Checking for header cephfs/libcephfs.h : yes Checking for library cephfs : yes Checking for ceph_statx in cephfs : ok Checking for ceph_openat in cephfs : not found Ceph support disabled due to

hmm I think I should use stretch instead of jessie, OR I should use a stretch-backport repos, right? Regards, Webert Lima DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia *Belo Horizonte - Brasil* *IRC NICK - WebertRLZ* On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 5:39 PM, Webert de Souza Lima <webert.boss at gmail.com > wrote: > Hi, I can't figure how to install latest stable dovecot version 2.2.35 in > Debian

On 2016-01-08 at 09:31 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 04:26:24PM +0100, Dirk Laurenz wrote: > > Hello List, > > > > as anyone tried to install samba with/ontop on a ceph cluster? > > Try compiling and setting up with vfs_ceph. Correct, that's basically it. > Needs some more work, but should work. Some posix features are not quite there

Hello Using two file server with samba 4.12.6 running as a CTDB cluster and trying to share a specific path on a cephfs. After loading the config the ctdb log shows the following error: ctdb-eventd[248]: 50.samba: ERROR: samba directory "/plm" not available Here is my samba configuration: [global] clustering = Yes netbios name = FSCLUSTER realm = INT.EXAMPLE.COM registry

31.07.2024 09:38, Anoop C S via samba wrote: > On Wed, 2024-07-31 at 08:36 +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: >> The problem is that ceph is disabled by configure even if it is >> explicitly enabled by the command-line switch.? Configure should fail >> here instead of continuing, - *that* is the problem. > > This is/was always the situation because building

Hi, I can't figure how to install latest stable dovecot version 2.2.35 in Debian Jessie If I follow this guide <https://repo.dovecot.org/>, it ends up installing 2.3 If I follow this guide <https://wiki.dovecot.org/PrebuiltBinaries#preview>, it ends up installing either 2.2.13 if I use "stable" or 2.2.36 alpha if I use "jessie" I see that 2.2.35 seems to be

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 05:47:35PM -0500, Joshua Dotson wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to build an active/active virtualization cluster using a Ceph > RBD as backing for each libvirt-managed LXC. I know live migration for LXC > isn't yet possible, but I'd like to build my infrastructure as if it were. > That is, I would like to be sure proper locking is in place for

On 21/09/2020 08:55, Jonas via samba wrote: > Hello > > > Using two file server with samba 4.12.6 running as a CTDB cluster and trying to share a specific path on a cephfs. After loading the config the ctdb log shows the following error: > > > ctdb-eventd[248]: 50.samba: ERROR: samba directory "/plm" not available > > > Here is my samba configuration: >