Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "dovecot + cephfs - sdbox vs mdbox"
2018 May 16
1
[ceph-users] dovecot + cephfs - sdbox vs mdbox
Thanks Jack.
That's good to know. It is definitely something to consider.
In a distributed storage scenario we might build a dedicated pool for that
and tune the pool as more capacity or performance is needed.
Regards,
Webert Lima
DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia
*Belo Horizonte - Brasil*
*IRC NICK - WebertRLZ*
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 4:45 PM Jack <ceph at jack.fr.eu.org> wrote:
2018 May 16
0
[ceph-users] dovecot + cephfs - sdbox vs mdbox
Hello Jack,
yes, I imagine I'll have to do some work on tuning the block size on
cephfs. Thanks for the advise.
I knew that using mdbox, messages are not removed but I though that was
true in sdbox too. Thanks again.
We'll soon do benchmarks of sdbox vs mdbox over cephfs with bluestore
backend.
We'll have to do some some work on how to simulate user traffic, for writes
and readings.
2018 May 16
0
[ceph-users] dovecot + cephfs - sdbox vs mdbox
Hi,
some time back we had similar discussions when we, as an email provider,
discussed to move away from traditional NAS/NFS storage to Ceph.
The problem with POSIX file systems and dovecot is that e.g. with mdbox
only around ~20% of the IO operations are READ/WRITE, the rest are
metadata IOs. You will not change this with using CephFS since it will
basically behave the same way as e.g. NFS.
We
2018 Apr 27
2
install dovecot 2.2.35 debian jessie
Got 2.2.34 running using debian strech image + strech-backports repos!
Regards,
Webert Lima
DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia
*Belo Horizonte - Brasil*
*IRC NICK - WebertRLZ*
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 9:37 PM, Webert de Souza Lima <webert.boss at gmail.com
> wrote:
> Oh thank you Cedric, I hadn't check that. So 2.2.35 is unstable, huh?
> I'll deploy 2.2.34 instead.
>
>
2018 Apr 26
2
install dovecot 2.2.35 debian jessie
Hi,
did you check in unstable ?
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dovecot
2018-04-26 16:43 GMT-04:00 Webert de Souza Lima <webert.boss at gmail.com>:
> hmm I think I should use stretch instead of jessie, OR I should use a
> stretch-backport repos, right?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Webert Lima
> DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia
> *Belo Horizonte - Brasil*
> *IRC NICK -
2018 Apr 27
1
install dovecot 2.2.35 debian jessie
Hey Aki Tuomi, how are you doing?
I have tried many ways for getting 2.2.35 pre-built installed via 'apt-get
install' in Debian Jessie and Stretch using the official repos.
The reason I prefer to install pre-built instead of compiling it is because
the I run it on dockers, so it's a lot easier and automated to just apt-get
install it.
I was using 2.2.31 devel in Debian Jessie, I
2018 Apr 26
2
install dovecot 2.2.35 debian jessie
Hi, I can't figure how to install latest stable dovecot version 2.2.35 in
Debian Jessie
If I follow this guide <https://repo.dovecot.org/>, it ends up installing
2.3
If I follow this guide <https://wiki.dovecot.org/PrebuiltBinaries#preview>,
it ends up installing either 2.2.13 if I use "stable" or 2.2.36 alpha if I
use "jessie"
I see that 2.2.35 seems to be
2023 May 09
2
MacOS clients - best options
Hi list,
we have migrated a single node Samba server from Ubuntu Trusty to a
3-node CTDB Cluster on Debian Bullseye with Sernet packages. Storage is
CephFS. We are running Samba in Standalone Mode with LDAP Backend.
Samba Version: sernet-samba 99:4.18.2-2debian11
I don't know if it is relevant here's how we have mounted CephFS on the
samba nodes:
(fstab):/samba /srv/samba ceph
2018 May 23
3
ceph_vms performance
Hi,
I'm testing out ceph_vms vs a cephfs mount with a cifs export.
I currently have 3 active ceph mds servers to maximise throughput and
when I have configured a cephfs mount with a cifs export, I'm getting
a reasonable benchmark results.
However, when I tried some benchmarking with the ceph_vms module, I
only got a 3rd of the comparable write throughput.
I'm just wondering if
2023 Jun 12
2
virsh not connecting to libvertd ?
Just found my issue.
After I removed the cephfs mounts it worked!
I will debug ceph.
I assumed because I could touch files on mounted cephfs it was working.
Now virsh list works!
thanks
jerry
Lars Kellogg-Stedman
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 04:56:38PM -0400, Jerry Buburuz wrote:
>> Recently both virsh stopped talking to the libvirtd. Both stopped within
>> a
>> few days of
2016 Jan 08
1
Samba & Ceph
On 2016-01-08 at 09:31 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 04:26:24PM +0100, Dirk Laurenz wrote:
> > Hello List,
> >
> > as anyone tried to install samba with/ontop on a ceph cluster?
>
> Try compiling and setting up with vfs_ceph.
Correct, that's basically it.
> Needs some more work, but should work.
Some posix features are not quite there
2017 Sep 22
3
librmb: Mail storage on RADOS with Dovecot
Hi ceph-ers,
The email below was posted on the ceph mailinglist yesterday by Wido den
Hollander. I guess this could be interesting for user here as well.
MJ
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [ceph-users] librmb: Mail storage on RADOS with Dovecot
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:40:03 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wido den Hollander <wido at 42on.com>
To: ceph-users at ceph.com
Hi,
A tracker
2020 Sep 21
2
ceph vfs can't find specific path
Hello
Using two file server with samba 4.12.6 running as a CTDB cluster and trying to share a specific path on a cephfs. After loading the config the ctdb log shows the following error:
ctdb-eventd[248]: 50.samba: ERROR: samba directory "/plm" not available
Here is my samba configuration:
[global]
clustering = Yes
netbios name = FSCLUSTER
realm = INT.EXAMPLE.COM
registry
2018 Jun 03
1
CTDB over WAN Link with LMASTER/RECMASTER Disabled
Hi,
I came across the 'CTDB_CAPABILITY_LMASTER=no' and 'CTDB_CAPABILITY_RECMASTER=no' options in my quest to salvage a rather poorly performing CTDB cluster over Ceph(fs). Unfortunately, the docs provide not enough information for a clustering noop like myself. Would there be any benefit to disabling those options for a branch office node on a high-latency WAN connection?
2018 Jan 19
0
Error: Corrupted dbox file
Hello Florent,
How did you proceed with the upgrade? Did you follow the recommended steps
guide to upgrade ceph? (mons first, then OSDs, then MDS)
Did you interrupt dovecot before upgrading the MDS specially? Did you
remount the filesystem? Did you upgrade the ceph client too?
Give people the complete scene and someone might be able to help you. Ask
on ceph-users list too.
Regards,
Webert
2023 May 11
1
MacOS clients - best options
On 5/11/23 15:35, Thomas Hukkelberg via samba wrote:
> We have exact same problem but never really found the underlying
> issue and whether it's a cephfs bug, a samba bug or only related to
> vfs_fruit.
it's a known subtle Ceph issue I'm afraid:
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/50719
If the issue still exists with a newer Ceph version then mentioned in
the bugreport, please
2014 Jan 15
2
Ceph RBD locking for libvirt-managed LXC (someday) live migrations
Hi,
I'm trying to build an active/active virtualization cluster using a Ceph
RBD as backing for each libvirt-managed LXC. I know live migration for LXC
isn't yet possible, but I'd like to build my infrastructure as if it were.
That is, I would like to be sure proper locking is in place for live
migrations to someday take place. In other words, I'm building things as
if I were
2015 Mar 31
2
couple of ceph/rbd questions
Hi, I've recently been working on setting up a set of libvirt compute
nodes that will be using a ceph rbd pool for storing vm disk image
files. I've got a couple of issues I've run into.
First, per the standard ceph documentation examples [1], the way to add a
disk is to create a block in the VM definition XML that looks something
like this:
<disk type='network'
2018 Oct 08
3
vfs_ceph quota support?
Hi Folks,
is the vfs_ceph supporting quota set on a directory inside cephfs?
Regards Felix
--
Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
52425 Jülich
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Jülich
Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Düren Nr. HR B 3498
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDir. Dr. Karl Eugen Huthmacher
Geschäftsführung: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Wolfgang Marquardt (Vorsitzender),
Karsten Beneke (stellv.
2019 Nov 07
2
samba performance when writing lots of small files
hi jeremy / all,
On 11/6/19 10:39 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> This is re-exporting via ceph whilst creating 1000 files,
> yes ? What timings do you get when doing this via Samba
> onto a local ext4/xfs/btrfs/zfs filesystem ?
yes, creating 10k small files. doing the same on a local ssd, formatted
with an ext4 fs without any special options:
root at plattentest:/mnt-ssd/os# time for s in