similar to: [bug] Auth cache, proxy and ITERINDEX

Hi, please post your doveconf -n Sami > On 16 Apr 2018, at 20.17, azurit at pobox.sk wrote: > > Hi, > > today we have exceprienced really major difficulties with our proxy backend servers. Everything started after enabling auth cache: > auth_cache_size = 100M > auth_cache_verify_password_with_worker = yes > auth_cache_ttl = 1 hour > auth_cache_negative_ttl = 1 hour

Cit?t Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi>: > On 29 Nov 2018, at 15.46, azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> is this a know problem? Newest Dovecot 2.3.4 package from >> repo.dovecot.org , Debian Stretch (fully upgraded). >> >> >> >> Nov 29 14:25:11 server00 dovecot: lmtp(16854): Panic: file >> ostream-dot.c: line 208

Cit?t azurit at pobox.sk: > Cit?t azurit at pobox.sk: > >> Cit?t Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi>: >> >>> On 29 Nov 2018, at 15.46, azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> is this a know problem? Newest Dovecot 2.3.4 package from >>>> repo.dovecot.org , Debian Stretch (fully upgraded).

Hi, is this a know problem? Newest Dovecot 2.3.4 package from repo.dovecot.org , Debian Stretch (fully upgraded). Nov 29 14:25:11 server00 dovecot: lmtp(16854): Panic: file ostream-dot.c: line 208 (o_stream_dot_sendv): assertion failed: ((size_t)ret == sent + added) Nov 29 14:25:11 server00 dovecot: lmtp(16854): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0xd25e1)

Cit?t Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi>: >> On 14 Aug 2017, at 11.10, zyrixx <zyrixx at gmx.net> wrote: >> >> mail_plugins = $mail_plugins mailbox_alias >> >> plugin { >> mailbox_alias_old = Trash >> mailbox_alias_new = Deleted >> mailbox_alias_old2 = Sent >> mailbox_alias_new2 = Sendet >> mailbox_alias_old3 =

Hi, I have recently upgraded a system with a Samba BDC, PDC and a couple of member servers from 3.2.14 to 3.4.9 (and also tested with 3.5.6). There appears to be some problem with Winbind (we need to run it on all servers as we have a trust relationship to a domain at another office). I have an Idmap range set up in our LDAP database. With 3.2.14, all worked well. The Idmap ou would be

ITERINDEX is a flag, it's not supposed to have any value. Aki On 16.10.2017 13:22, Mar?a Arrea wrote: > > ??? I have tested putting the same value in ITERINDEX & INDEX, is this > the expected? > > ??? Regards > > ??? Mar?a > > El 07/09/17 a las 08:44, Mar?a Arrea escribi?: >> Hello >> >> ??? I have a question about the new setting ITERINDEX.

On 16.10.2017 13:30, Mar?a Arrea wrote: > El 16/10/17 a las 12:25, Aki Tuomi escribi?: >> ITERINDEX is a flag, it's not supposed to have any value. >> >> Aki > So ITERINDEX=yes should be the right value? This is the right > mail_location settings? > >

Hello I have a question about the new setting ITERINDEX. This is my filesystem layout /indices_dovecot : 8 x Fast SSD drives /buzones : 32x SAS 10k rpm disks /buzones/alternativo : 24 x SAS 7.2k rpm slow disks This is my mail_location: mail_location =

Thank you Mr. Aki ??? Should this info about ITERINDEX be present in https://wiki.dovecot.org/MailLocation ? Bit confusing now. El 16/10/17 a las 12:35, Aki Tuomi escribi?: > > On 16.10.2017 13:30, Mar?a Arrea wrote: >> El 16/10/17 a las 12:25, Aki Tuomi escribi?: >>> ITERINDEX is a flag, it's not supposed to have any value. >>> >>> Aki >> So

El 16/10/17 a las 12:25, Aki Tuomi escribi?: > ITERINDEX is a flag, it's not supposed to have any value. > > Aki So ITERINDEX=yes should be the right value? This is the right mail_location settings? mail_location=mdbox:/buzones/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:ITERINDEX=yes:INDEX=/indices_dovecot/indices/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:ALT=/buzones/alternativo/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n > >

??? I have tested putting the same value in ITERINDEX & INDEX, is this the expected? ??? Regards ??? Mar?a El 07/09/17 a las 08:44, Mar?a Arrea escribi?: > Hello > > ??? I have a question about the new setting ITERINDEX. This is my > filesystem layout > > ??? /indices_dovecot : 8 x Fast SSD drives > ??? /buzones : 32x SAS 10k rpm disks > ??? /buzones/alternativo

Hi, i'm trying to implement malbox aliases but it's not fully working as i expected. This is my configuration: mail_plugins = acl mailbox_alias plugin { mailbox_alias_old = INBOX/Odoslane mailbox_alias_new = INBOX/SentTest } That 'INBOX/' must be there because of this (we were moving from Courier IMAP): namespace inbox { type = private prefix = INBOX/ separator = /

# 2.3.4.1 (f79e8e7e4): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf Hello, we're using mail on NFS and the indexes on localdisk, with a director setup. (18K+ users) now to get more performance i thought to use the ITERINDEX option. however this has the side-effect on some mailboxes that it doesn't show the subfolders under INBOX. they seem 'disappeared'. Removing the ITERINDEX option fixes this

Hi. I use dovecot-2.0.11-1.fc14.i686 on linux,redhat fedora 14. Using alpine 2.02 and Kmail 1.13.5 i have one IMAP connection to the dovecot server and one IMAP connection to a MS exchange server. After i moved a few messages from the exchange server i cannot open the folders where i placed the moved mails. instead dovecot crashes, all other directories and emails work fine. here is what i see

Hi, I have a machine that must to reexport glusterfs to nfs. CONFIGURATION 2 glusterfs servers | ?| ? | 1 gluterfs client 1 nfs server ?| ?| ?| 1 nfs client #*********************************************** # GLUSTERFS SERVER ?#*********************************************** # Export with glusterfs $ glusterfs -f /etc/glusterfs/glusterfs-server.vol $ cat

Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: >> On July 10, 2017 at 1:45 PM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> >> >> Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: >> >> >> On July 10, 2017 at 12:33 PM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> i'm trying to

> On July 11, 2017 at 11:50 AM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: > > > > Cit?t azurit at pobox.sk: > > > Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: > > > >>> On July 10, 2017 at 1:45 PM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: > >>> >

Hi, i'm using Dovecot 2.1.7 (Debian Wheezy) and output from LIST command looks strange: C: 4 LIST () "" (INBOX INBOX.Karantena INBOX.Spam) RETURN (STATUS (UNSEEN)) S: * LIST () "." "INBOX" S: * LIST () "." "INBOX.Karantena" S: * STATUS "INBOX.Karantena" (UNSEEN 0) S: * LIST () "." "INBOX.Spam" S: * STATUS

Am 2019-08-02 10:39, schrieb Alexander Dalloz via dovecot: > Am 2019-08-02 10:31, schrieb Thomas Krause via dovecot: >> Hi all, >> I tried to migrate a mailserver from Debian 9 (Dovecot 2.2.27) to >> Debian 10 (Dovecot 2.3.4.1). I moved the mail-partition and >> /etc/dovecot from the old to the new server. Dovecot started with >> 2 warnings. When trying to fetch