similar to: understanding dovecot director passdb configuration

Hi imap-login by default in mail server is restarted after every login request keeping security in mind to avoid leak of critical data. But in a director config, the imap-login director process is not restarted on each auth request. Can somebody explain why this design decision is taken? -- Kalyanasundaram http://blogs.eskratch.com/ https://github.com/kalyanceg/ -------------- next part

Hi All, I'm trying to use smbclient command within my unix shell script to copy around 10,000 zip files from unix to a windows fileshare. For some reason, its not copying them all and after 5000+ files, it throws out some 0KB files into the file share and exits the process. Do you guys have any idea why its happening so ? Please advise. Thanks Kumar

> > And for other services like IMAP, SMTP, LDAP (maybe not LDAP) constant > changing certs even with a long lived root may get old for your customers. Why? I have corporate systems on 2 year commercial CA signed certificates and personal servers on 90 day LetsEncrypt ones - my users of IMAP and SMTP have never ever noticed when I changed the certificates on any device. They

I need to save that to database because I have more then one mail server and them must share each other failed login attempts information. I'll try check how Dovecot Authentication Policy works. --JAcek 2017-06-12 16:50 GMT+02:00 Leonardo Rodrigues <leolistas at solutti.com.br>: > Em 12/06/17 09:39, j.emerlik escreveu: > >> Failed login attempts information may be useful

Package: xcp-xapi Version: 1.3.2-15 Severity: important New wheezy box Follow the setup instructions for xcp-xapi, choosing openvswitch networking Only loopback is defined in /etc/network/interfaces (the way it should be for XCP) IP address, router, DNS has been configured statically with pif-reconfigure-ip After reboot, the IP address is assigned correctly on the bridge interface but some

> Am 01.09.2018 um 12:51 schrieb Pete Biggs <pete at biggs.org.uk>: > > That was until LetsEncrypt comes along - it has the backing of some big > names and *IS* an effective business model for small and private > customers. What *is* the business model of Let?s Encrypt? Are they going to issue ?Pro? certificates at some point that cost money? Running a CA is not expensive

Am 05.05.2016 um 10:58 schrieb C Bergström via llvm-dev: > Sincerely and pragmatically - what do you think will be different > after this is in place.. Bureaucracy is great, but what's broken or > pandemic that you're trying to fix? From the last discussion, I gather that it's an attempt to prevent damage before it can happen. I'm quite sceptical about that. It's

Greetings all, This has come up a few times, and I would like to resume the effort to establish an LLVM code of conduct. First and foremost, many thanks to Philip Reames who sat down with me several months ago and worked through a number of suggestions that I've tried to incorporate into an updated patch with the draft text: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13741 I think his updates plus a few