Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Auth SEGV on sparc64, alignment problem?"
2018 Feb 21
0
Auth SEGV on sparc64, alignment problem?
Your core dump looks a bit broken. Since it seems to die instantly, can
you try gdb /path/to/auth and just run it?
Aki
On 21.02.2018 02:08, Chris Ross wrote:
> Apologies first for using two addresses, but I can?t currently read my email at distal.com. :-)
>
> I was previously running dovecot2-2.2.29.1_2 on FreeBSD 11 on sparc64. Trying to debug a problem I was having with one of
2018 Feb 22
0
Auth SEGV on sparc64, alignment problem?
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 19:08:27 -0500, Chris Ross wrote:
>
> Apologies first for using two addresses, but I can?t currently read my email at distal.com. :-)
>
> I was previously running dovecot2-2.2.29.1_2 on FreeBSD 11 on sparc64.
> Trying to debug a problem I was having with one of my clients, I
> upgraded to dovecot-2.2.33.2_4 on that same server. However, I
2018 Feb 22
2
Auth SEGV on sparc64, alignment problem?
Fancy, while not fun. :-) But thanks, that does work. Doing that, n?ing over calls to strcmp, it failed:
passdbs_init () at passdb.c:313
313 passdb_register_module(&passdb_ldap);
(gdb)
passdb_register_module (iface=0x280120) at passdb.c:33
33 old_iface = passdb_interface_find(iface->name);
(gdb)
passdb_interface_find (name=0x16fe60 "ldap") at passdb.c:20
20
2012 Dec 04
2
[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2012-12-04 23:10:18 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-12-04 23:10:18 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 root at farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-12-04 23:10:18 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2012-12-04 23:10:18 - cleaning
2013 Nov 20
1
[releng_10 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - tinderbox 2.20 running on worker01.tb.des.no
TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - FreeBSD worker01.tb.des.no 9.1-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p4 #0: Mon Jun 17 11:42:37 UTC 2013 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - starting RELENG_10 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - cleaning the
2017 Dec 30
6
building debug version of klibc
Hello!
Can someone please help me in building debug version of klibc ?
I've cloned git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/klibc/klibc.git , but
failed to build it with debug info
added "-g" to HOSTCFLAGS in Makefile, but
$ make -j KLIBCKERNELSRC=`pwd`/../linux-2.6/usr
still strips every debug symbol , and i'm failed to change
scripts/Kbuild.klibc and Makefile to remove strip
2008 Jul 29
1
[releng_7 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:14 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:14 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:14 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:32 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:32 - /usr/bin/csup -r 3 -g -L 1 -h localhost -s /tinderbox/RELENG_7/sparc64/sparc64/supfile
TB ---
2013 Jul 01
3
Problems booting into ZFS on recent stable/9
I had a sparc64 (Netra X1) running a stable/9 from late March 2013. Actually, the kernel may've been a bit newer than that as I was working with folks to diagnose and repair some Netra-X1 specific issues. But, ZFS worked fine. I have two pools, zroot as a RAID1 (using equally sized partitions at the front of two large disks), and a zdata that is a large pool of the remaining space of both
2004 Jul 31
3
Asterisk on Sparc64
Ming-Wei Shih wrote (Re: [Asterisk-Users] Best Linux for
Asterisk)
> I am running * CVS head on Gentoo/i586
> and Gentoo/Sparc64 (US60 2x450/1GB RAM),
> they are running great.
>
> On sparc64 * does not compile out-of-the-box,
> some hackings in the Makefiles are needed.
Great stuff.
Please, can you share your adjustments to the Makefiles
with the community?!
If you don't
2010 Apr 26
2
[LLVMdev] llvm for freebsd on sparc64
I am trying to build llvm on freebsd-8.0 on sparc64 CPU.
I patched sources because 'sparc' enum value in
include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h conflicts with gcc typedef 'sparc'.
This allowed llvm itself to build successfully.
But there is an error during gcc frontend compile:
Did not get a target machine! Triplet is sparc64-unknown-freebsd8.0
I think this is because in many places, like in
2007 Dec 02
3
ipp2p: Unaligned access in search_all_ed2k on sparc64
Hey guys,
I''ve just built a sparc64 (Ultra/5) based firewall with ipp2p compiled
as a module and I''m constantly getting the following message in my logs:
Kernel unaligned access at TPC[100f8490] search_all_edk+0x20/0x4c
[ipt_ipp2p]
I''m running the following versions:
- Kernel 2.6.22
- ipp2p 0.8.2-r4
- iptables 1.3.8-r1
Any thoughts?
2014 Feb 02
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM/Clang on Sparc64
Thanks to Jakob's work on Sparcv9 ABI in Clang and recent changes to
Sparc code generator, I am happy to announce that Clang can self host
itself on Linux/Sparc64 and on FreeBSD/Sparc64.
However, it still fails on a few unit tests and nightly tests,
primarily due to misaligned memory accesses in the code (See bugs
18482, 18500, 18502, 18536, 18693). Unlike other architectures,
misaligned
2006 Feb 14
2
[rfc patch] mman.h remove asm/page.h include
klibc fails to compile on sparc64 since the kbuild switch:
In file included from include/sys/mman.h:11,
from klibc/malloc.c:8:
linux/include/asm/page.h:18:2: error: #error No page size specified in kernel configuration
the current dirty build hack is to define CONFIG_SPARC64_PAGE_SIZE_8KB
in the sparc64 MCONFIG.
belows patch removes the asm/page.h include.
another way to fix
2005 Jun 17
2
Patch to support parisc
This patch allows klibc to build on parisc64 platforms.
$ diff -u MCONFIG.old MCONFIG
--- MCONFIG.old 2005-06-18 01:16:12.000000000 +0000
+++ MCONFIG 2005-06-18 01:18:51.000000000 +0000
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
KLIBCVER = -D__KLIBC__=$(shell cut -d. -f1 < $(SRCROOT)/version) \
-D__KLIBC_MINOR__=$(shell cut -d. -f2 < $(SRCROOT)/version)
-ARCH = $(shell uname -m | sed -e
2010 May 06
3
[LLVMdev] Failure to compile llvm-gcc-4.2-2.7 on FreeBSD on sparc machine
llvm itself compiles fine.
gcc frontend has the error, see below.
I applied the attached patch, since the name of architecture on FreeBSD
is sparc64, not sparc. There is also one more replacement sparc ->
spaarc64 was made in gcc/Makefile in llvm-gcc.
FreeBSD -8.0-STABLE
gcc-4.5.0
sunblade 100
Yuri
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
`/tmp/llvm-build/2.7/llvm-gcc-4.2-objects/libdecnumber'
2003 Apr 08
5
Status of SPARC64 port?
I was looking at the Sparc 64 4.7 or 4.8 port, wondering if its in any state
to put on my Solaris v100.
Just need the basics, eide, network, kbm,mouse, graphics (x).
A bonus would be support for the lom (light out management) features and the
flash card.
Reason for change is I HOPE that the math (ssl) performance is better on
FBSD, as well as I am just tired of keeping track of
2016 Jun 28
2
Fwd: rsync seem to be broken on sparc64
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: rsync seem to be broken on sparc64
Date: 2016-06-27 23:43
From: alexmcwhirter at triadic.us
To: debian-sparc at lists.debian.org
I posted about this in the kernel lists a few months ago to no avail. I
see it on gentoo as well with any kernel newer than 3.18. I came across
this when using lxc on sparc64. The debian template uses rsync to move
the
2014 Feb 02
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM/Clang on Sparc64
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Anton Korobeynikov
<anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote:
> That's really cool! Should we add note to Release Notes?
Definitely. I will add a note mentioning about this in ReleaseNotes.rst.
>
> On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Venkatraman Govindaraju
> <venkatra at cs.wisc.edu> wrote:
>> Thanks to Jakob's work on Sparcv9 ABI in
2008 Jun 18
3
Dovecot index, NFS, and multiple architectures
Hi all,
I crawled through the archives for a bit but didn't see anything
helpful, so I apologize if this has already been addressed. We've been
dying to move from Courier to Dovecot across our whole infrastructure
for quite some time, but until recently our setup wasn't possible until
this happened:
"Dovecot allows mailboxes and their indexes to be modified by multiple
2012 Jan 11
1
nouveau on Linux/sparc64 SunBlade 100
Hello everyone,
Thank you nouveau developers as it seems you may almost of a solution to
my lack of good graphics options for my aging sun system.
I saw here before back in early December of 2011 a most of someone
saying that it seemed that the nouveau drivers almost worked with him
and is Sun Ultra 10. I am someone who is very fond of my Sun systems, I
have two "SunBlade 100"s,