similar to: Locks directory change

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 7:30 AM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > > On October 26, 2017 at 4:30 PM Federico Bartolucci <federico at aruba.it> > wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > it's the first time for me writing to the list, I'm trying to change the > > location into which the Dovecot's locks are done reserving

> On October 26, 2017 at 4:30 PM Federico Bartolucci <federico at aruba.it> wrote: > > > Hello, > > it's the first time for me writing to the list, I'm trying to change the > location into which the Dovecot's locks are done reserving a special > temporary directory on an other partition, then adding to the > dovecont.conf the line: > >

Hello, thank you for your suggestion, I can obtain just this from the backtrace: /[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]/ /Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1"./ /Core was generated by `dovecot/imap'./ /Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted./ /#0? 0x00007f44637bb1f7 in __GI_raise (sig=sig at entry=6) at

Hello, has anyone experiened any issues with IMAP SPECIAL-USE extension with ios11? After the update to ios11 the Ios mail client seems to not recognize anymore the imap special-use, so that system folders (Sent, Trash etc..) are not authomatically recognized and set during the configuration. Regards Federico -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Timo Sirainen wrote: > There are various changes in this release that can be used to significantly reduce disk IO with: > 1) NFS storage especially, but I guess also other remote filesystems and even some with local disks > 2) When mail storage and INDEX storage are separated Thanks for these changes! Big win for my setup. My servers are not overly stressed, but how much performance

Hello, has someone already tested the dovecot-proxy with more than 10 nodes? or someone knows anyway if is it officially supported up to a certain number? Thanks.

https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.32.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.32.tar.gz.sig Two more fixes since rc2. And repeating: There are various changes in this release that can be used to significantly reduce disk IO with: 1) NFS storage especially, but I guess also other remote filesystems and even some with local disks 2) When mail storage and INDEX storage are

https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.32.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.32.tar.gz.sig Two more fixes since rc2. And repeating: There are various changes in this release that can be used to significantly reduce disk IO with: 1) NFS storage especially, but I guess also other remote filesystems and even some with local disks 2) When mail storage and INDEX storage are

Hi, yes sure, we already use proxy with mysql auythentication. On the same server we have the proxy working with mysql and it regularly uses the backends servers, but when we configure the proxy to use LDAP instead it always uses the default localhost and not the backend IPs. Regards -federico Il 21/05/2019 07:25, Aki Tuomi ha scritto: > > > On 20.5.2019 20.06, Federico Bartolucci via

(I did subscribe to this mailing list, albeit with zen at freedbms.net, so either way I'm getting all your emails - thank you -so- much for replying...) MUA is mutt, reading email in a terminal (sorry, forgot to mention this before). For many years now my email folder (mbox files) collection has grown to many GiB, mostly mailing lists. If I am to change email storage format, it should be

Hello, configuring Dovecot with LDAP authentication, adding the parameter in ther sql config file: pass_attrs = \ ??????? =proxy=y I see then backend connections always addressed to localhot port 143: /user=utente1 at domanin.com proxy?? lip=127.0.0.1?? lport=143???/ while I expect that connections would be managed by the director and then addressed to my backend IPs and specific port. Is

I am wondering why sieve-filter is so slow compared to gnu sieve. I run mpop (like getmail) to download from a pop3 server to a local mbox file: ~/mail/email-incoming-unsorted This step is very fast. The next step, I throw the email-incoming-unsorted mbox file at a sieve processor, to sort the emails from that mbox, into other mboxes, according to the sieve rules file. Up until a couple days

Hello, when doing a simple search through the lucene indexes in some mailboxes (with actually many subfolders) the search terminates after a few seconds with no result and the dovecot log shows this error: Fatal: master: service(imap): child 15433 killed with signal 6 (core not dumped) Any clue about the reasons? the lucene indexes have been already rebuilt and look OK. Regards -federico

Using 2.3.8 and mail_location = maildir:/var/mail/%Ln:CONTROL=/var/lib/dovecot/control/%Ln:VOLATILEDIR=/var/lib/dovecot/control/%Ln:INDEX=/var/lib/dovecot/control/%Ln + also user_query = SELECT ... CONCAT('maildir:/var/mail/', LOWER(u.login), '/:CONTROL=/var/lib/dovecot/control/%Ln:VOLATILEDIR=/var/lib/dovecot/control/%Ln:INDEX=/var/lib/dovecot/control/%Ln') AS mail, ... but I

On 2018-10-05 11:35, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 4 Oct 2018, at 17.13, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: >> >> >> On 2018-10-04 15:55, Timo Sirainen wrote: >>> On 4 Oct 2018, at 14.39, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: >> >>>> Is this correct, and if so are there any plans to move dotlocks etc. >>>> to this

Hi According to the docs, setting VOLATILEDIR will improve I/O performance when using NFS - but as far as I can see, only vsize lock-files are put here, and little else? Is this correct, and if so are there any plans to move dotlocks etc. to this directory? Thanks. -- Tom

On 2018-10-04 15:55, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 4 Oct 2018, at 14.39, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: >> Is this correct, and if so are there any plans to move dotlocks etc. >> to this directory? > > > What dotlocks? I guess mbox and Maildir have some locks that could be > moved there, but a better performance optimization for those > installations

On 5 Oct 2018, at 16.42, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk <mailto:mail at tomsommer.dk>> wrote: > > On 2018-10-05 11:50, Tom Sommer wrote: >> On 2018-10-05 11:35, Timo Sirainen wrote: >>> On 4 Oct 2018, at 17.13, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk <mailto:mail at tomsommer.dk>> wrote: >>>> On 2018-10-04 15:55, Timo Sirainen wrote:

https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.32.rc1.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.32.rc1.tar.gz.sig There are various changes in this release that can be used to significantly reduce disk IO with: 1) NFS storage especially, but I guess also other remote filesystems and even some with local disks 2) When mail storage and INDEX storage are separated * imapc: Info-level

https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.32.rc1.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.32.rc1.tar.gz.sig There are various changes in this release that can be used to significantly reduce disk IO with: 1) NFS storage especially, but I guess also other remote filesystems and even some with local disks 2) When mail storage and INDEX storage are separated * imapc: Info-level