similar to: Parallel build problems with dovecot 2.2.32

On 10 Oct 2017, at 3.47, Craig Leres <leres at ee.lbl.gov> wrote: > > I use dovecot under FreeBSD 10.3 and build using poudriere. My build server has 12 cores builds typically happen in parallel and I find software that is not parallel make friendly will fail once every month or so. > > Attached is a build log from this afternoon that failed because doveadm-util.o had not

On Sat, 3 Jun 2017 16:04:57 -0700 Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: [snip] > I think you should be able to fix it by changing the > compiler-rt/lib/xray/test/CMakeLists.txt. If you find the > "add_compiler_rt_test" call and move "-lstdc++" to the end, just after > "-lrt" it should work. Thanks, Tim. I don't see "-lrt":

Hi Charles, Yes, it looks like my g++ does contain STL library which might be just my specific case... However, as a temporary solution I disabled nutclient in Makefile (please find the file attached). And nut-2.7.3 can be compiled now. Thanks, Sergey On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 6, 2015, at 10:32 AM, Sergey Talchuk

Hi, I am trying to build the LLVM suite on a RedHat Enterprise Linux clone (Scientific Linux <https://www.scientificlinux.org/>). In the latest attempt, the build seems to complete without any explicit failures but the `check-all` process fails. Any ideas about what is wrong or suggestions for how to proceed would be much appreciated. This is the current procedure: sudo yum install

Hola! Necesito reinstalar ubuntu, con lo cual R se actualizará a 2.13.3 (es la última version, verdad?) y me gustaría saber si hay alguna forma de conservar los paquetes que ya tengo instalados en R.? Muchas gracias!! Milagros [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Buenas tardes: Por favor, ¿alguien me puede explicar este comportamiento?. Lanzo este código enun equipo con una pantalla de 21'''' y el resultado es correcto, tanto en la ventana gráfica como al guardar en pdf: quartz(title="Ventada de prueba", width=8.27, height=11.69, dpi=85) plot(1:10) Sin embargo, lanzado en un equipo con pantalla de 15'''', la

Hi, It seams that IX didn't Motive Themen Version change. Thx Harald -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet.

On 2017-08-27 12:06, Harald Leithner wrote: > Hi, > > It seams that IX didn't Motive Themen Version change. > > Thx > > Harald Try http://xi.dovecot.fi/debian.new/ Aki

On 2017-08-27 12:31, azurit at pobox.sk wrote: > > Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: > >> On 2017-08-27 12:06, Harald Leithner wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> It seams that IX didn't Motive Themen Version change. >>> >>> Thx >>> >>> Harald >> >> Try http://xi.dovecot.fi/debian.new/ >> >>

I use this packages without problems since a longtime and Always test thease packages before going to production system. As Debian? user I have 3 variants. Stick with old Software. Have compile software on the machine. Have a build and distribution enviroment. 1st is not an option for Dovecot die me. 2nd is not a good idea 3rd is in planing ;) Bye Am 27. August 2017 11:31:55 MESZ schrieb

Hi! On 04.09.2017 14:38, Harald Leithner wrote: > Hi, > > it seams that the lazy_expunge plugin doesn't work for me after the > upgrade... > > 2.2.32 cry's about > > plugin { lazy_expunge_only_last_instance=no } is most likely handled > as 'yes' - remove the setting completely to disable it. If this is > intentional, add quotes around the value: >

Ok thx for the info, anyway there are no mail copied to #EXPUNGED/ namespace. Am 04.09.2017 um 13:40 schrieb Aki Tuomi: > Hi! > > On 04.09.2017 14:38, Harald Leithner wrote: >> Hi, >> >> it seams that the lazy_expunge plugin doesn't work for me after the >> upgrade... >> >> 2.2.32 cry's about >> >> plugin {

Hello I have a question about the new setting ITERINDEX. This is my filesystem layout /indices_dovecot : 8 x Fast SSD drives /buzones : 32x SAS 10k rpm disks /buzones/alternativo : 24 x SAS 7.2k rpm slow disks This is my mail_location: mail_location =

Any idea why this doesn't setup work anymore in 2.2.32? thx Harald Am 04.09.2017 um 13:52 schrieb Harald Leithner: > Ok thx for the info, anyway there are no mail copied to #EXPUNGED/ > namespace. > > > > Am 04.09.2017 um 13:40 schrieb Aki Tuomi: >> Hi! >> >> On 04.09.2017 14:38, Harald Leithner wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> it

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:01 AM, Harald Leithner <leithner at itronic.at> wrote: > Any idea why this doesn't setup work anymore in 2.2.32? > > thx > > Harald > > I just ran into the same thing myself. For me, when I added this to the "location" in the expunged namespace, it started working again: ...:LISTINDEX=expunged.list.index I can't tell you why

Am 2017-09-15 21:25, schrieb Mark Moseley: > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:01 AM, Harald Leithner <leithner at itronic.at> > wrote: > >> Any idea why this doesn't setup work anymore in 2.2.32? >> >> thx >> >> Harald >> >> > > I just ran into the same thing myself. For me, when I added this to the > "location" in the

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Harald Leithner <leithner at itronic.at> wrote: > Am 2017-09-15 21:25, schrieb Mark Moseley: > >> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:01 AM, Harald Leithner <leithner at itronic.at> >> wrote: >> >> Any idea why this doesn't setup work anymore in 2.2.32? >>> >>> thx >>> >>> Harald >>>

??? I have tested putting the same value in ITERINDEX & INDEX, is this the expected? ??? Regards ??? Mar?a El 07/09/17 a las 08:44, Mar?a Arrea escribi?: > Hello > > ??? I have a question about the new setting ITERINDEX. This is my > filesystem layout > > ??? /indices_dovecot : 8 x Fast SSD drives > ??? /buzones : 32x SAS 10k rpm disks > ??? /buzones/alternativo

El 16/10/17 a las 12:25, Aki Tuomi escribi?: > ITERINDEX is a flag, it's not supposed to have any value. > > Aki So ITERINDEX=yes should be the right value? This is the right mail_location settings? mail_location=mdbox:/buzones/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:ITERINDEX=yes:INDEX=/indices_dovecot/indices/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:ALT=/buzones/alternativo/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n > >

Thank you Mr. Aki ??? Should this info about ITERINDEX be present in https://wiki.dovecot.org/MailLocation ? Bit confusing now. El 16/10/17 a las 12:35, Aki Tuomi escribi?: > > On 16.10.2017 13:30, Mar?a Arrea wrote: >> El 16/10/17 a las 12:25, Aki Tuomi escribi?: >>> ITERINDEX is a flag, it's not supposed to have any value. >>> >>> Aki >> So