similar to: Dovecot and Self-signed issue

I'm not running any A/V software, and the same version of dovecot on servers with CA signed certs (komodo) - the client connects to them just fine. On 09/25/2017 01:40 PM, Tony wrote: > It does look like a client issue. Do you also have some kind of AV > running? There are some AV software that can sometimes interfere with > mail sessions. See if you might be running into a similar

With the current Thunderbird I can not connect to one of my IMAP servers that uses a self-signed cert. Virtually identical IMAP servers that use CA signed certs work I was a bit out of date when I updated to 7.4 and was running Thunderbird 45.6.x and it worked. When I connected from evolution (which I do not like) it worked. When I connected with my laptop still running 45.6.x it works. so

Hello Micheal, this reminds me of something, that I experienced in the past. Why would the server! complain "Unknown CA"? To test inspect the communication with wireshark and look if the client sends a cert; or: $ echo "a001 LOGOUT" | openssl s_client -msg -connect your.server:993 and grep for "CertificateRequest". Do you have a certificate configured in your

On 09/27/2017 11:14 PM, Phil Perry wrote: > On 28/09/17 04:19, Alice Wonder wrote: >> With the current Thunderbird I can not connect to one of my IMAP >> servers that uses a self-signed cert. Virtually identical IMAP servers >> that use CA signed certs work >> >> I was a bit out of date when I updated to 7.4 and was running >> Thunderbird 45.6.x and it

It does look like a client issue. Do you also have some kind of AV running? There are some AV software that can sometimes interfere with mail sessions. See if you might be running into a similar situation: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1066126 Cheers, -- TC On 9/25/17 1:27 PM, Michael A. Peters wrote: > I use dovecot on several servers. One of them uses a self-signed cert, >

Definitely client issue, connecting via evolution works just fine. So I suppose it is off the the thunderbird list. I like thunderbird better. Only plugin I use is dkim validator and when I started thunderbird w/o extensions - still had same issue. But I think it is definitely not a dovecot problem. On 09/25/2017 01:49 PM, Michael A. Peters wrote: > I'm not running any A/V software,

No, no certificate in thunderbird. Work fine when running CentOS 7.3, laptop that still runs 7.3 works fine. I'm going to attempt building the CentOS 7.3 thundirbird src.rpm in 7.4 and see if that fixes it, and if it does, file a bug report with rhel. On 09/26/2017 01:17 AM, Peter Chiochetti wrote: > Hello Micheal, > > this reminds me of something, that I experienced in the past.

On 28/09/17 04:19, Alice Wonder wrote: > With the current Thunderbird I can not connect to one of my IMAP servers > that uses a self-signed cert. Virtually identical IMAP servers that use > CA signed certs work > > I was a bit out of date when I updated to 7.4 and was running > Thunderbird 45.6.x and it worked. > > When I connected from evolution (which I do not like)

On 4/28/2020 3:17 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > - gateway sends a router solicitation and gets a router advertisement > with "stateful config" set, which tells gateway to do DHCPv6 (but > default route comes from RA) I'm not seeing any outbound IPv6 traffic from my CentOS 7 box on the WAN interface. I do see RA's emitting from the LAN interface, from radvd. Is there

I have about 15 nodes running 1.1pre15 connected and running quite well. I don't remember why I installed 1.1preX originally. Possibly because I added a router with custom firmware to the network (Tomato Shibby firmware for my ASUS router) which included 1.1pre14. Now I'm trying to add an Openwrt device and it includes 1.0.33 only. This will replace the Tomato Shibby device with

Hello list, I try to install puppet agent on Debian Lenny. I got following error. Seems the repo is broken : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- node001:~# wget http://apt.puppetlabs.com/puppetlabs-release-lenny.deb --2012-10-12 02:12:12-- http://apt.puppetlabs.com/puppetlabs-release-lenny.deb

I discovered that IPv6 is sort of working when I got an email rejection from Comcast for not having an IPv6 PTR record. I discovered I could telnet to port 25 on their MX server over IPv6! I then found I could tracroute6 to them, but I couldn't to my Linode VPS in Fremont. It gets to the data center and stops. Going the other way, my Linode can traceroute6 almost to my AT&T-hosted

Hello tincers, I run a small tinc mesh using version 1.1pre10 on mostly linux (debian) hosts. In the past, I was able to successfully join my windows machine to the tinc network, when I was running an earlier version of tinc (throughout the mesh). However, with 1.1pre10, I have had no success. Is this a known error, a misconfiguration on my part, or some other issue? I currently have no tinc-up

Well, I found a solution and posted it on the appdb's page of Red Alert 3. http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=14371 Here's a copy of the informations I posted on the Red Alert's Appdb webpage : > Thanks to raphael, here's a mini "how to play on LAN to RA3 with Wine + windows users, when the LAN is a VPN" > > My hostname, in

Tried running the below command:- * sudo rpm -ivh http://yum.puppetlabs.com/el/6/products/i386/puppetlabs-release-6-7.noarch.rpm * And got this:- Retrieving http://yum.puppetlabs.com/el/6/products/i386/puppetlabs-release-6-7.noarch.rpm curl: (7) Failed to connect to 2600:3c00::f03c:91ff:fe69:6bf0: Network is unreachable error: skipping

Hi Gluster users, We are seeing 'error=No space left on device' issue and hoping someone might could advise? We are using a 12 node glusterfs v10.4 distributed vsftpd backup cluster for years (not new) and recently 2 weeks ago upgraded to v9 > v10.4. I do not know if the upgrade is related to this new issue. We are seeing a new issue 'error=No space left on device' error

Hi,Have you checked inode usage (df -i /lvbackups/brick ) ? Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov On Tuesday, May 2, 2023, 3:05 AM, brandon at thinkhuge.net wrote: Hi Gluster users, We are seeing 'error=No space left on device' issue and hoping someone might could advise? We are using a 12 node glusterfs v10.4 distributed vsftpd backup cluster for years (not new) and recently 2 weeks ago

I have been gradually moving more tinc servers over to ipv6 addresses on the tinc 1.1 branch. Tinc is inserting a default route for ipv6 for some reason... default via 2600:3c01:e030:f2::1 dev tinc6 proto static metric 950 pref medium In my case the default route supplied by ra is still the correct thing, but I don't see where in the code tinc is inserting this route from.... which, as

Hi, I see a lot of the following messages in the logs: [2018-02-04 03:22:01.544446] I [glusterfsd-mgmt.c:1821:mgmt_getspec_cbk] 0-glusterfs: No change in volfile,continuing [2018-02-04 07:41:16.189349] W [MSGID: 109011] [dht-layout.c:186:dht_layout_search] 48-gv0-dht: no subvolume for hash (value) = 122440868 [2018-02-04 07:41:16.244261] W [fuse-bridge.c:2398:fuse_writev_cbk] 0-glusterfs-fuse:

On 5 February 2018 at 15:40, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > I see a lot of the following messages in the logs: > [2018-02-04 03:22:01.544446] I [glusterfsd-mgmt.c:1821:mgmt_getspec_cbk] > 0-glusterfs: No change in volfile,continuing > [2018-02-04 07:41:16.189349] W [MSGID: 109011] > [dht-layout.c:186:dht_layout_search] 48-gv0-dht: no