similar to: Why does Dovecot authentication against Openldap fail when using TLS encryption?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Why does Dovecot authentication against Openldap fail when using TLS encryption?"

2013 Sep 23
0
can't dovecot tls/ssl to openldap
Hi, I want to dovecot connect to openldap with ssl/tls, and got error. When without tls/ssl, it works ok. from /var/log/maillog got: Sep 24 05:38:03 mail dovecot: auth: Error: LDAP: ldap_start_tls_s() failed: Connect error Sep 24 05:38:03 mail dovecot: auth: Error: LDAP: ldap_start_tls_s() failed: Can't contact LDAP server Sep 24 05:38:03 mail dovecot: auth: Error: LDAP:
2016 Dec 29
0
Allow direct connection between some (but not all) nodes on the network (Guus Sliepen)
Guus Sliepen, I am working in a zeroconf setup for tinc called tzk, that could allow you to make this easily https://github.com/NebTex/tzk/ it will make better readme this weekend but you need a public machine with a public domain - subdomain pointed to it, the script will install tinc, consul (that is used for coordinate the vpn), and caddy a small reverse proxy for expose consul to the public
2011 Oct 05
0
doveadm(user001): Fatal: passdb lookup failed
Hello all, why I can run whis command: imap1:~ # doveadm user user001 userdb: user001 ? mail????? : maildir:/var/maildir/vol04/4/46/user001 ? home????? : /var/mailfilter/vol04/4/46/user001 ? quota_rule: *:bytes=100000000 but not this one: imap1:~ # doveadm quota get -u user001 doveadm(user001): Error: user user001: Auth PASS lookup failed doveadm(user001): Fatal: passdb lookup failed what
2014 Oct 29
1
Quota reporting
Hi, my main server will be upgraded from Dovecot 1.2something to 2.2. For testing I've installed a setup with postfix, handing malis as a relay via lmtp. So far it's up and running - really nice. AFAICS there's one issue left: Thunderbird and Kmail don't show the quota status. Using doveadm quota the information is shown correctly, even the user-specific values (coming from
2018 Oct 30
0
Problem with cached userdb info
Hi, I'm having a problem with my cached userdb information. These are my passdb and userdbs: passdb { driver = ldap args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf.ext } userdb { driver = prefetch } userdb { driver = ldap args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap-userdb.conf.ext } In /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap-userdb.conf.ext (userdb) I have: user_attrs =
2015 May 06
1
lmpt director and ldap userdb
Hello, I've been using dovecot for a long time, but now I'm having troubles with I change I need to make. I have a director server in front of two backend servers. All of these servers are running dovecot 2.1.16. Redirection to backend servers are based in an attribute of a ldap server. My users are defined in this same ldap server. At this moment, for user authentication we use
2003 Jul 31
0
IPIP tunnels and TCP connections
I was trying the following setup with IPIP tunnels, one that used to work through another ISP, but no longer... Internal network | Linux box 1 (kernel 2.2.24) iif=10.0.0.1, extf=a.b.c.d, tunf=172.16.0.1 | |local metropolitan network | Another Linux box 2 (kernel 2.2.17, or 2.4.19, same result) iif=irrelevant, extf=x.y.z.v,
2005 Oct 19
1
gre/ipsec loadbalancing
Hi, I have the following setup. Two linux systems with two [test] external interfaces encrypted with ipsec [transport]. Two gre tunnels that pass 10.200.0.0/24 and 10.200.1.0/24 network traffic. Testing the balanced tunnels I would setup iptraf on one and ping from the other. The results would be as expected; traffic would be split between the two interfaces. Testing with an ftp transfer of
2004 Oct 08
0
[Bug 1890] New: TLS for rsync protocol
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1890 Summary: TLS for rsync protocol Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: All URL: http://metastatic.org/source/rsync-ssl.patch OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
2018 Aug 07
0
limit sharing ability to certain users
Ah. You probably need to change ldap userdb so that you add userdb { driver = ldap ? args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf result_success = continue-ok } so that the next one is processed. you can use 'doveadm user test at onnet.ch' to verify that the attributes are read for this user, and with another username that they are not. Aki On 07.08.2018 12:23, Simeon Ott wrote: > ?
2005 Oct 19
0
load balance with gre/ipsec
Hi, I have the following setup. Two linux systems with two [test] external interfaces encrypted with ipsec [transport]. Two gre tunnels that pass 10.200.0.0/24 and 10.200.1.0/24 network traffic. Testing the balanced tunnels I would setup iptraf on one and ping from the other. The results would be as expected; traffic would be split between the two interfaces. Testing with an ftp transfer of
2005 Oct 20
0
(no subject)
Hi, I have the following setup. Two linux systems with two [test] external interfaces encrypted with ipsec [transport]. Two gre tunnels that pass 10.200.0.0/24 and 10.200.1.0/24 network traffic. Testing the balanced tunnels I would setup iptraf on one and ping from the other. The results would be as expected; traffic would be split between the two interfaces. Testing with an ftp transfer of
2013 Nov 15
2
2 routes & 1 destinations
Hi, At office, we have I ISPs. I want to lightly monitor each link latency in order to decide several routing. For that, I have only one external server: 1 IP, it's an OVH dedicated server. The quick picture is http://s24.postimg.org/n3436z64l/defaul_route.png Default route is via ISP1. If OVH-server pings IP1: - the request will go through ISP1: it's OK - the reply will go through
2018 Aug 07
0
limit sharing ability to certain users
Hmm. if you put it *after* the ldap userdb, it should not have prevented users from logging in. What happens if you do userdb { ? driver = passwd-file ? args = .... ? skip = notfound ? result_failure = continue-ok } Aki On 07.08.2018 12:58, Simeon Ott wrote: > Now the attributes are correctly read for the user test at onnet.ch > <mailto:test at onnet.ch>, but other users are not
2002 Jan 02
2
advanced routing for 2 internet lines
Hi all, I have a Linux box with two connections to the internet over two routers and a private internal network. The linux box does masquerading. internet +----------+ 172.16.0.1 +-------------------+ <---- | Router 1 |-------------------| | +----------+ | 172.16.0.2 | | | eth1
2012 Jul 06
3
Node not find
Hi, my new server doesn''t find his node *whereas i did the same for my others servers and it works on them*. My key is generated and signed by my master (i had had to add my puppetmaster in /etc/hosts). My node : *node ''vpsXXXXX.ovh.net'' { * * * *}* * * It''s save in vpsXXXXX.ovh.net.pp in puppet/manifests/nodes and in my site.pp i include nodes/* . When i
2010 May 26
0
with dovecot deliver amavisd not work
hello all reader hello list hello centos network since I've installed dovecot deliver. e-mails no longer pass through amavisd. amavisd no longer work. c is to say I have no anti-spam and anti virus my postconf and dovecot -n [root at r13151 ~]# postconf -n alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases , hash:/etc/postfix/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases , hash:/etc/postfix/aliases body_checks =
2009 Apr 07
1
i have a probleme and my asterisk and ovh
hello every body my connexion on ovh to pass in UNREACHABLE and not reidentified were not reboot the server. [Apr 7 20:17:21] NOTICE[19947]: chan_sip.c:15605 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer 'ovh' is now Lagged. (2067ms / 2000ms) [Apr 7 20:17:35] NOTICE[19947]: chan_sip.c:19829 sip_poke_noanswer: Peer 'ovh' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 2067 but my probleme is the adress
2010 May 26
1
with dovecot deliver amavisd not work
hello all reader hello list hello dovecot network since I've installed dovecot deliver. e-mails no longer pass through amavisd. amavisd no longer work. c is to say I have no anti-spam and anti virus my postconf and dovecot -n [root at r13151 ~]# postconf -n alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases , hash:/etc/postfix/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases , hash:/etc/postfix/aliases body_checks
2003 Mar 14
5
ipsec for linux 2.4 eventually made easy?!
hi there, I just wanted to share a recent discovery I did on how to setup a secure VPN implementation for linux 2.4.x (I''m using 2.4.20 but it should be working, as far as documentation states, for > 2.4.18) without using FreeS/WAN. The tool (ipsec_tunnel: http://ringstrom.mine.nu/ipsec_tunnel/, by Tobias Ringström) is a kernel module based on ipip and ip_gre. It uses CyptoAPI to