Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "Replication Troubles"
2017 Feb 22
1
Replication Troubles
On 20 Feb 2017, at 11:09, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote:
>
> On 17 Feb 2017, at 21.37, Wolfgang Hennerbichler <wogri at wogri.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dovecot Users,
>>
>> I?ve configured dovecot dsync replication and I see troubles in the logs and get user complaints which I can?t explain. I found similar threads on this mailinglist, but I couldn?t
2017 Feb 20
0
Replication Troubles
On 17 Feb 2017, at 21.37, Wolfgang Hennerbichler <wogri at wogri.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Dovecot Users,
>
> I?ve configured dovecot dsync replication and I see troubles in the logs and get user complaints which I can?t explain. I found similar threads on this mailinglist, but I couldn?t find a solution anywhere. Does anybody have dsync running without problems on a high volume
2015 Jun 20
2
Duplicate mails with pop3 + dsync replication
Hi,
When I enable (and it only happens when it is actually running) replication over TCP my users get duplicate mails via pop3.
Here?s what happens:
* User gets mail
* Mail appears in (Maildir) new/ folder on both replicas
* user retrieves mail (retr), calls dele. Mail still exists in new/ folder on both replicas.
* user runs retr (and gets the duplicate) and dele a second time, the mail is
2017 Mar 24
1
One way dsync replication with dsync -R
So, even with a particular user only connecting to one node in the pair, you still see the issue? I'm not seeing that in my setup. I only see it when concurrently connecting the same user to two different nodes in the pair.
Blessings,
Rob Archibald
CTO, EndFirst LLC
rob at robarchibald.com
> On Mar 24, 2017, at 12:50 AM, Wolfgang Hennerbichler <wogri at wogri.com> wrote:
>
>
2015 Jun 22
2
Duplicate mails with pop3 + dsync replication
It turns out that if I enable this option:
pop3_deleted_flag = "$POP3Deleted?
The issue no longer persists. I have to manually expunge the kept mails that have been deleted via pop3 though:
doveadm expunge mailbox INBOX KEYWORD '$POP3Deleted' -A
Wolfgang
> On 21 Jun 2015, at 21:05, Wolfgang Hennerbichler <wogri at wogri.com> wrote:
>
> FWIW I just tried the sdbox
2017 Mar 22
2
One way dsync replication with dsync -R
Ugh, sorry for the formatting. Not sure what happened when it sent through the list. Trying again
Blessings,
Rob Archibald
CTO, EndFirst LLC
rob at robarchibald.com
-----Original Message-----
From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Rob Archibald
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 3:55 PM
To: 'Wolfgang Hennerbichler'; dovecot at dovecot.org
Subject: RE: One way
2007 Mar 22
1
DomU configuration file
Hi,
I know this may be very basic question but I need some help . Actually I
installed VM using the Xen Administrative console.
Now I need to change the configuration file as I need to passthrough
(using the pci-hide) a SCSI contoller from Dom0 to DomU.
But I couldnot find the configuration file.
Where can I find the Configuration file for this DomU?
Actually I added the
2017 Mar 22
2
One way dsync replication with dsync -R
Hi dovecot users,
I?ve found the -R parameter for dsync. Does this enable one-way syncing if enabled on the slave in replication_dsync_parameters? The documentation doesn?t mention much what happens if I enable this on the ?replciation slave?.
Before you ask: Two way synchronisation causes issues in my installation (see the unanswered thread here:
2015 Jun 21
0
Duplicate mails with pop3 + dsync replication
FWIW I just tried the sdbox mailbox format for a singe user (not the whole installation) by overriding the mail-userattr via ldap and the problem persists, so I don?t think it?s an issue with maildir per se, but rather a pop3 / replication issue or a misconfiguration on my side.
Wolfgang
> On 20 Jun 2015, at 22:29, Wolfgang Hennerbichler <wogri at wogri.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
2014 Jan 15
2
Ceph RBD locking for libvirt-managed LXC (someday) live migrations
Hi,
I'm trying to build an active/active virtualization cluster using a Ceph
RBD as backing for each libvirt-managed LXC. I know live migration for LXC
isn't yet possible, but I'd like to build my infrastructure as if it were.
That is, I would like to be sure proper locking is in place for live
migrations to someday take place. In other words, I'm building things as
if I were
2013 Nov 07
4
Re: RBD images locking
Eric,
Well, in case where several servers may start the same virtual machines after a reboot for exemple.
http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2013-August/003887.html
I've seen this hook here : http://www.wogri.at/en/linux/ceph-libvirt-locking/
But it's a hook...
Yes, I may try to write a patch. My coding skills are surely not as good as yours but I 'd be glad to make
2017 Mar 24
0
One way dsync replication with dsync -R
Rob,
Unfortunately I don?t think the director will solve this problem. I have a director in front of my setup and it is configured to point every client to one server. It didn?t change anything in its behavior.
I also have a setup without a director where the clients are only allowed to talk to one host (DNS entries control this) - same thing.
Wolfgang
> On Mar 22, 2017, at 23:58, Rob
2017 Mar 22
0
One way dsync replication with dsync -R
I'm using dsync successfully to keep two nodes synchronized, but I have the same problems as you. When I first set it up, I purposely had my phone connected to one node and my desktop connected to the other node. This allowed me to watch for the very issues you're referring to. I ran into them enough that I quit using it that way. But, what I also found was that it was just a timing issue.
2013 Nov 07
2
RBD images locking
Hi,
One short question : Is there any chance to see locks on rbd/images in the next release ?
Thank you :)
2017 Mar 31
1
dsync replication
Is it stable for dovecot 2.2.27 to implement DRBD (or HAST) on block level
for maildir data replication instead of using dsync plugin?
Regards,
George
2014 Jan 16
0
Re: Ceph RBD locking for libvirt-managed LXC (someday) live migrations
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 05:47:35PM -0500, Joshua Dotson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to build an active/active virtualization cluster using a Ceph
> RBD as backing for each libvirt-managed LXC. I know live migration for LXC
> isn't yet possible, but I'd like to build my infrastructure as if it were.
> That is, I would like to be sure proper locking is in place for
2007 Dec 07
2
[ActiveSupport] Patches needing review: re-organization of #to_query methods, preservation of XML/JSON content-type
Just a quick pointer to some ActiveSupport patches hoping for reviews:
Puts Array#to_query and Object#to_query in the right places in
ActiveSupport - http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10395
Preserve user-specified content type for XML and JSON rendering
(currently it''s overridden and set to Mime::XML/Mimi::JSON -
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10388
Oh and a tiny patch for
2015 Jun 01
2
extraño error con seq
Estimados colisteros,
Acabo de encontrar un extraño error usando la función seq:
>seq(from = 0.6 + 0.1, to = 0.7, by = 0.1)
[1] 0.7
# todo bien
>seq(from = 2.2 + 0.1, to = 2.3, by = 0.1)
Error in seq.default(from = 2.2 + 0.1, to = 2.3, by = 0.1) :
wrong sign in 'by' argument
La ayuda de seq establece que "Specifying to - from and by of opposite signs is an error". Y
2017 May 26
2
Unir municipios
Fíjate, había visto aggregate del paquete raster, pero lo había excluído porque pensaba que trabajaba sólo con imágenes raster... ¡qué cosas! :)
Gracias. Lo miraré.
Isidro Hidalgo Arellano
Observatorio del Mercado de Trabajo
Consejería de Economía, Empresas y Empleo
http://www.castillalamancha.es/
-----Mensaje original-----
De: R-help-es [mailto:r-help-es-bounces en r-project.org] En nombre de
2015 Nov 12
3
Una ayudita
Quisiera saber si alguien me puede ayudar con documentación o el lugar donde encontrarla, relacionada con la elaboración de paquetes en R, tengo algunos script programados y quiero convertirlos en paquetes; he leído el manual para hacer extensiones pero quiero algo más sintético y practico,
Agradezco cualquier colaboración al respecto
Heber
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]