similar to: Checking sieve

It might have a noticeable effect on clients. I encountered (probably triggered by this in some way?) that I was unable to het the 'read' bit set in macOS Mail.app. Maybe (as I am doing HA with round robin) the Mail.app client got to one dovecot repository on one tcp connection and then on the other. Is there a reason why syncing tis move from new to cur is a bad idea? Gerben Wierda

I can confirm this in a slightly different setting, but still using two-way sync between two dovecots. On e is 2.3.19.1 running on macOS Monterey, the other is 2.3.20 running in an alpine container on Ubuntu. Gerben Wierda (LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerbenwierda>) R&A IT Strategy <https://ea.rna.nl/> (main site) Book: Chess and the Art of Enterprise?Architecture

On January 6, 2023 3:56:39 AM GMT+02:00, Gerben Wierda <gerben.wierda at rna.nl> wrote: >One step further in my quest to create a replacement mail server. > >I now have my old mail server (2.3.19.1, macOS + MacPorts) and my new (2.3.20, Alpine Linux, Docker, apk package). When I turn on replication it works, but, after a while I see: > >Jan 06 00:50:31 replicator: Panic: data

I am migrating an old dovecot 2.2.30 (macOS High SIerra, macO S Server) to a new server with dovecot 2.3.7 (macOS Mojave, macports). To get the data over, I?m trying to do a reverse backup with doveadm between an old and a new mail server, but failing to do so. I?m trying (from the new server, the old server is 192.168.2.67): doveadm -Dv \ -o imapc_host=192.168.2.67 \ -o imapc_user=gerben \

One step further in my quest to create a replacement mail server. I now have my old mail server (2.3.19.1, macOS + MacPorts) and my new (2.3.20, Alpine Linux, Docker, apk package). When I turn on replication it works, but, after a while I see: Jan 06 00:50:31 replicator: Panic: data stack: Out of memory when allocating 268435496 bytes Jan 06 00:50:32 replicator: Fatal: master:

I am new to dovecot administration. I?ve read the Wiki but that hasn?t given me the understanding I need. When I query my LDAP (on macOS) on a value for user ?gerben?, I can get that: dumbledore:~ gerben$ dscl /LDAPv3/127.0.0.1 -read /users/gerben GeneratedUID GeneratedUID: 780D870E-6B00-478E-AB70-3D3307215A82 I would like to use that value in dovecot settings, e.g. something like user_attrs =

I am in the habit of syncing my /usr/local tree over several computers (all Mac OS X). Recently my /usr/local tree has doubled in size, from 300,000 files to 600,000 files because I have added a large subversion checkout (TeX Live). As a result, rsync has become a time hog. Instead of a minute or two or so to calculate what needs to be sent over, suddenly this process takes 18-20 minutes,

How problematic is it to have default_vsz_limit = 0 in dovecot.conf? macOS+MacPorts had this as a requirement even. Gerben > On 6 Jan 2023, at 16:49, Paul Kudla <paul at scom.ca> wrote: > > > i ran into this as well > > here is the full config for mine with replication > > # cat dovecot.conf > # 2.3.14 (cee3cbc0d): /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf > #

ok a little bit more info .... My servers all run under FreeBSD 12.xx which was also the base for the apple operating system origionally. setting default_vsz_limit = 0 i seem to remember trying with no so great results setting to zero can cause memory over runs (espically with replication) etc i found that when i used the config i sent eariler (vsz_limit is defaulted (not set )) everything

> On 22 Oct 2016, at 19:04, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > >> On October 22, 2016 at 7:51 PM Gerben Wierda <gerben.wierda at rna.nl> wrote: >> >> >> Hello folks, >> >> I have an older dovecot 2.0 (which I will migrate to a 2.2 asap, but at this point in time I need a fix). This is a dovecot 2.0 that came with Mac OS X

I am migrating a server. The old one uses dovecot 2.2.30.2 and the new one 2.3.7.1. I don?t want to use any tool that might influence flags on messages. I am using Maildir format on both ends and I have a way to let one server access the data on the other (either using an rsync or a direct access). Could I set up a sync between both to create a smooth migration? Gerben Wierda Chess and the Art

Hello folks, I have an older dovecot 2.0 (which I will migrate to a 2.2 asap, but at this point in time I need a fix). This is a dovecot 2.0 that came with Mac OS X 10.8.5 Server 2.2.5. Today, my spam/virus filtering (clamav) on the Server broke down. As a result, all my meesages got the ***UNCHECKED*** tag added to each subject. That was clearly unacceptable. SO, for the tim ebeing I have set

Hello, I have a question in regards to specific dovecot replication behaviour and I'm just wondering if this is actually an expected/normal behaviour, or just a version issue. I'm using dovecot 2.3.16 which is packed by default with latest Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS server release. I setup dovecot replication pair (mx1 - mx2) which is working ok. MX1 has priority 10, MX2 has priority 20. I

Now that Apple has abandoned mail server capabilities in macOS Server.app we have to move to an open source solution. I have done this using Macports and it works well (no thanks to Apple as it never published the in 2018 promised migration info for mail services). The MacPorts Apple Push Notification variant based on a patch written a few years ago for dovecot supports APNS but it requires you

https://github.com/st3fan/dovecot-xaps-daemon Works PERFECTLY. I use it on CentOS 6 and 7. Thanks, Steffan Cline steffan at hldns.com 602-793-0014 > On Jan 8, 2020, at 2:39 PM, infoomatic <infoomatic at gmx.at> wrote: > > ?I have no idea about that Mac proprietary stuff ... however, > https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/push_notification/ might be > a

Suppose my mail_location is: mail_location = maildir:/private/var/mail/nl.rna.mail/%u But I would like to use a simple lookup table to replace %u with another value, say '8DB4E345-9144-4F92-8C9F-9D47BB61CBF8? instead of ?username?. Is there a (simple) way to do this? Gerben Wierda Chess and the Art of Enterprise Architecture <http://enterprisechess.com/> Mastering ArchiMate

> Le 13 sept. 2019 ? 09:29, Gerben Wierda via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> a ?crit : > > Nobody? > >> On 10 Sep 2019, at 11:58, Gerben Wierda via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org <mailto:dovecot at dovecot.org>> wrote: >> >> I am new to dovecot administration. I?ve read the Wiki but that hasn?t given me the understanding I need. >>

I just found out that Ubuntu Linux 22.04 LTS has a dovecot apt package that is 2.3.16. Debian 11 (stable) is at dovecot 2.3.13 with apt. if I looked correctly. Dovecot itself is at 2.3.20. That surprised me (I am new to the Linux distro and package management world) as Ubuntu 22.04 is a Long-Time Support version, and I was expecting packages to be updated as well (as many users will want updated

Hi, I am running rsync 2.6.3 on Mac OS X 10.4. I have set up rsync to act as rsync server on one machine with a module entry like this: syslog facility = local5 [src-rw] path = /usr/local/src comment = whole /usr/local/src tree hosts allow = [ip addresses deleted] hosts deny = * uid = gerben gid = staff read only = no I have an

Hello, I'm using dovecot 2.2.10 and roundcube (with managesieve enabled). Sieve filtering works well, as long the rule is written into ~/.dovecot.sieve (which is a link to ~/sieve/managesieve.sieve) When adding a new filter set (in roundcube) the script is written to ~/sieve/newfilterset.sieve. This script will not be executed. How can I solve this? I set sieve_dir = ~/sieve This should work,