similar to: Configuration problem for secure virtual server

On Qui, 15 Dez 2016, Karsten Malcher wrote: > Hello, > > mail_uid = Debian-exim This will be important later > > Dec 15 18:03:25 pop3(karsten at server): Error: user karsten at server: > Initialization failed: Initializing mail storage from > mail_location setting failed: stat(/mountpoint/mail/server/karsten) > failed: Permission denied (euid=107(Debian-exim) >

Hello, for many years i used an mailserver with dovecot V1 very satisfied! http://mailserver.decotrain.de/ One of the reasons to use dovecot was a simply configuration. Dovecot was the best choice for IMAP for me! Now i updated the server to Debian testing with dovecot 2.1.7. It's not possible for me to get a running authentication for virtual mail users! I recently found this mailing and

Hi all: We're planning to deploy a large e-mail system storing maildirs in a NAS system through NFS. One of the options we're thinking on is using Dovecot+EXIM. As far as I've read in both project's documentation, both services implement locking allowing multiple servers to access the same maildirs in order to distribute the service load. However, I can't find any information

Hi all, I did try to do this myself as I thought Tuomas had introduced himself and gotten wiki access for other pages ... but my skills with the #acl markup have atrophied and I couldn't make it work. :) I'd like Tuomas to have access so there is a clear commit record of him having down the work, and in the future to collaborate on any adjustments to that page. best regards, - Karsten

> ? 2015?6?5????6:10?Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> ??? > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 06/04/2015 12:58 PM, Pete Travis wrote: > >> >> I'm tentatively planning on working pagure[0] into the Fedora Docs >> toolchain. It handles issue tracking, process >> documentation/contribution guidelines, and of course

Hi, I am running two dovecot servers active/active. Everything runs pretty great, except for the replication of subscriptions in a shared namespace. When I unsubscribe from a folder the subscription instantly re-appears. The timestamp on the subscriptions file is updated, but the entry is still in there. If the other node is shut down, everything works as expected, which leads me to believe that

Hello people, Since the invention of this storage called dbox, I have never quite gotten round to understanding it, nor getting to use it. It seems so strange to me and I must ask a few stupid questions about it. I use the MTA to deliver mail to Maildir, either in ~/Maildir or /some/path/%d/%n/Maildir. It has always beat me how dbox comes into play under such circumstances. From the wiki, I see

Hi folks, I have a dataframe df.vars with the follwing structure: var1 var2 var3 group Group is a factor. Now I want to standardize the vars 1-3 (actually - there are many more) by class, so I define z.mean.sd <- function(data){ return.values <- (data - mean(data)) / (sd(data)) return(return.values) } now I can call for each var z.var1 <- by(df.vars$var1, group,

Hi Kartsen, you'll have my proposal by the end of the day. I am not good at writing content. :( I have sorted out all the technicalities though. Regards, Kunal Jain On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Kunaal: > > I know you are still researching, but I think you may have

Karsten, On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:06 PM Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > There is now a draft permission letter working it's way through the > CentOS Board. It is intended to cover permission for just the GNOME > Project's use with GNOME Boxes. This is *really* good news! > > I am still pursuing resolving this within the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/05/2015 01:52 PM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: > On 06/05/2015 08:30 PM, Karsten Wade wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> >> Folks: >> >> A few of us (KB, Johnny, myself) have begun work on updating the >> main FAQs on the CentOS wiki. Mainly that means looking over and >> updating

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Is the app at http://possereg.teachingopensource.org still being used? If so, can we migrate that to the main TOS server? If not, I'd like to take it down as part of a server migration we're doing for theopensourceway.org host. Thanks - Karsten - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade .^\ CentOS Doer of Stuff

On Jun 4, 2015 12:17 PM, "Karsten Wade" <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 06/01/2015 10:30 PM, Lei Yang wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As discussed earlier about the workflow, I and Kunaal will need a > > server space to host Bugzilla, a test repository at Github + a git > > repository at

Hi there, I am not getting anywhere near a solution, so here is my question. I have searched the archives and didn't find a solution, but maybe my search didn't use the right words. So here it is: I have a dataframe with the following structure factor1 factor2 value In the (rather large) dataset I have to work on, there are some factor combinations missing, e.g. factor1 <-

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/30/2015 09:19 AM, Dougal Matthews wrote: > An alternative approach would be to build the docs in CI and link > to the built version in a comment on both systems. This is an interesting idea. We'll end up wanting docs to build in the CI anyway, so this could be done using e.g. a -draft tag so an initial commit can be used to both build

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/16/2015 11:33 AM, Jim Perrin wrote: > My only question is, how do we determine what goes in the wiki vs > what goes in git? The flow/format between the two is a bit > different. Or is this development the first step in the transition > away from the wiki to another medium? That's a good question, and I don't have it

On 09/18/2018 11:03 AM, Fabiano Fid?ncio wrote: > My understanding is that we can use all the CentOS marks provided here[0]. > However, those unfortunately are not looking good enough on Boxes and > we'd like to use, if possible, just the logo as in here[1] > > Would that be possible? As far as I could understand that would be a > violation of the trademark. > > [0]:

Thanks Rich for drawing this forward, I had missed it. (I generally handle all the trademark usage queries.) The key reference is this one, the trademark guidelines: https://www.centos.org/legal/trademarks/ That document should give the GNOME project all of the authorization and guidelines on how to use and not use the CentOS marks. Fabiano -- if you have any further questions, you may also

Hi list, I''m running xen3 on verious systems and are very happy with the way it works. My set up is based on files as partitions but I have encountered a problem I can only create 4 partitions this way since all are primary partitions. Are there any solution to this problem other than move the domU''s to real partitions ? Thanks in advance Karsten

Hi, I have problems with SIP via TLS. Asterisk works as a client. The TCP connection is established, followed by a client hello from Asterisk to the server. The server sends Server Hello, Certificate, Server Key Exchange and Server Hello Done. Than Asterisk sends back a Alert (Level: Fatal, Description Handshake Failure). The following line appears in the log: ast_iostream_start_tls: Problem