similar to: JMAP support in Dovecot

Hi! We are working on including JMAP support to Dovecot. At this moment I cannot give any promise for exact version, but hopefully it will be part of v2.3 Aki Tuomi Dovecot Oy > On November 26, 2016 at 11:17 PM Andrew Jones <andrew at mykolab.com> wrote: > > > Hi Marcus > > Thanks for your helpful reply. > > Do you know what is going on with JMAP development

Unfortunately we have not been able to work on this much, but also the JMAP spec was until very recently still being worked. We have open dialogue with the Thunderbird people, they haven't so far indicated any pressing need for JMAP in Dovecot. This said, JMAP is still very much in our roadmap. Perhaps just not as close as I initially thought. Aki On 21.5.2019 16.29, Tanstaafl via dovecot

Am 14.11.19 um 14:03 schrieb Benny Pedersen via dovecot: > Thomas G?ttler via dovecot skrev den 2019-11-14 08:55: > >> Is there already an open source imap2jmap server? > > why do you say imap here ? > > https://www.cyrusimap.org/imap/developer/jmap.html > > cyrus already have it, we just wait for dovecot :) I used my favorite search engine (ecosia) and found

On 2016-11-26 11:07:00 -0800, WJCarpenter wrote: > I don't know the answer to that question, but I am curious about something. > What client are you thinking about using with JMAP? I haven't found much. > (And much of the demo stuff at jmap.io seems to be busted in various ways.) roundcube-next builds on top of it. darix -- openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux

On Wed, May 22, 2019, at 23:43, Tanstaafl via dovecot wrote: > On Wed May 22 2019 05:44:59 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Aki Tuomi > via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > Unfortunately we have not been able to work on this much, but also the > > JMAP spec was until very recently still being worked. We have open > > dialogue with the Thunderbird people,

On Sun, 27 Nov 2016, at 06:07, WJCarpenter wrote: > I don't know the answer to that question, but I am curious about > something. What client are you thinking about using with JMAP? I haven't > found much. (And much of the demo stuff at jmap.io seems to be busted in > various ways.) The demo proxy was a pretty quick hack and isn't very efficient, but it should be

On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 10:37:49AM +1100, Bron Gondwana wrote: > Robert is in Australia visiting the FastMail office to co-work with us for a > couple of months, and I'd love to get this Xapian integration work done > during this time. We're also looking to release Cyrus IMAPd version 3.0 some > time in the next few months, and it would be great to not depend on too many >

Hello Aki, Well, it has been over 3 years since I last asked... You had said initial JMAP support would hopefully make it into 2.3. Since it didn't, I'm hoiping it isn't too far away. There is some movement with the new Thunderbird team on this, but they can't really start serious work on adding JMAP support until there is a server implementation to test against. Is JMAP

Hi Aki, Someone just asked in the bug for Thunderbird for this, so... Is there a git branch that they could use to start playing with what is there? If not, any idea when that might happen? It sounds like someone following the Thunderbird bug is interested in working on this, but they obviously need something to test against. Thanks, Charles On 11/27/2016 5:28 AM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at

On Wed, Jun 19, 2013, at 03:49 PM, Olly Betts wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 01:29:16PM +1000, Bron Gondwana wrote: > > The advantage of compact - it runs approximately 8 times as fast (we > > are CPU limited in each case - writing to tmpfs first, then rsyncing > > to the destination) and it takes approximately 75% of the space of a > > fresh database with maximum

Bron Gondwana writes: > This is quite possibly part of the underlying write explosion that we ran into when we wrote: > > https://fastmail.blog/2014/12/01/email-search-system/ > > Which now almost 5 years on, has been running like a champion! We're really pleased with how well it works. Xapian reads from multiple databases are really easy, and the immediate writes onto

I'm trying to compact (or at least merge) multiple databases, while stripping search records which are no longer required. Backstory: I've inherited the Cyrus IMAPd xapian-based search code from Greg Banks when he left Opera. One of the unfinished parts was removing expunged emails from the search database. We moved from having a single search database to supporting multiple

http://trac.xapian.org/wiki/ReleaseOverview/1.2.15 The links to individual NEWS items are broken: i.e. http://svn.xapian.org/*checkout*/tags/1.2.15/xapian-core/NEWS http://svn.xapian.org/Xapian/tags/1.2.15/xapian-core/NEWS?view=markup might be a better link. Regards, Bron. -- Bron Gondwana brong at fastmail.fm

Am 16.11.19 um 08:15 schrieb Bron Gondwana via dovecot: > proxy.jmap.io is very stale code at the moment.? I'm hoping to have enough time to hack on it at the IETF hackathon this > weekend :) I am a big biased. AFAIK it is written in Perl. I am very happy that I did not need to use Perl since 18 years now. The regex where great. But time has changed. Everytime you use regex today, I

(This is not neccesarily about dovecot, but rather IMAP protocol) At https://drive.google.com/open?id=1j3oa5jYeSdiPbgaihq02K-u_vHbZLJZQ is fetchmail log from my sessinon with polish email provider "Wirtualna Polska" As you can se fetchmail logged "* 1 EXPUNGE" as a response to "STORE" command. According to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3501#section-7.4.1 EXPUNGE

proxy.jmap.io is very stale code at the moment. I'm hoping to have enough time to hack on it at the IETF hackathon this weekend :) Cheers, Bron. On Fri, Nov 15, 2019, at 00:44, Thomas G?ttler via dovecot wrote: > Am 14.11.19 um 14:03 schrieb Benny Pedersen via dovecot: > > Thomas G?ttler via dovecot skrev den 2019-11-14 08:55: > > > >> Is there already an open

I haven't had a chance to look at the patch and won't be able to do before January. Its design description sounds promising, though. The snippet generator code linked to by Bron contains mostly the same code as in my pull request, with two exceptions: it adds a flag to make the generator return the empty string for snippets without any matching terms. And it includes a fix to a possible

Gaurav, James and I are attending the GSoC reunion in San Jose, California, USA this weekend, so if anyone else is around, do come and say hello. We're also going to be holding a documentation sprint on Monday and Tuesday next week in San Francisco. If anyone else wants to take part (remotely would work) let me know. The only plan we have so far is to come up with a plan over the weekend.

Hi Marcus Thanks for your helpful reply. Do you know what is going on with JMAP development into Dovecot 2.5? It's difficult to get any sort of information from the roadmap and there are no Dovecot forums. One of the main reasons I'm interested in JMAP is because of Roundcube Next and also the other clients it will power. Sadly, there has been little going on and having emailed Thomas,

Hi James, thanks for the feedback. On Thu, Jul 28, 2016, at 00:22, James Aylett wrote: > This sounds great! I know sufficiently little about CJK that I won't > try to comment on that at all :) I've just opened a pull request for the CJK tokenizer: https://github.com/xapian/xapian/pull/114 > I wonder if we can arrange suitable defaults to use your > implementation with the