similar to: sieve sending vacation message from vmail@ns1.domain.tld

Could you send your configuration (output from `dovecot -n`)? Also, please provide an example scenario; i.e., for one problematic delivery provide: - The values of the variables substituted below. - The incoming e-mail message. - The Sieve script (or at least that vacation command). Regards, Stephan. Op 19-10-2016 om 11:42 schreef Matthew Broadhead: > hi, does anyone have any ideas

Also, please provide an example scenario; i.e., for one problematic delivery provide: - The values of the variables substituted in the dovecot-lda command line; i.e., provide that command line. - The incoming e-mail message. Regards, Stephan. Op 19-10-2016 om 12:43 schreef Matthew Broadhead: > dovecot is configured by sentora control panel to a certain extent. if > you want those

Op 19-10-2016 om 13:47 schreef Matthew Broadhead: > i am not 100% sure how to give you the information you require. > > my current setup in /etc/postfix/master.cf is > flags=DRhu user=vmail:mail argv=/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d > ${recipient} > so recipient would presumably be user at domain.tld? or do you want the > real email address of one of our users? is there

do i need to provide more information? On 19/10/2016 14:49, Matthew Broadhead wrote: > /var/log/maillog showed this > Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 postfix/smtpd[1298]: 7599A2C19C6: > client=unknown[127.0.0.1] > Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 postfix/cleanup[1085]: 7599A2C19C6: > message-id=<edc55a9b-eb49-3945-dc60-0e1d51a78e97 at nbmlaw.co.uk> > Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 postfix/qmgr[1059]:

is there something more i need to be doing my end? On 25/10/2016 09:11, Matthew Broadhead wrote: > are there any instructions or tests i can make to check the sieve > configuration? or does the magic all happen internally and there are > no settings to change? > > On 21/10/2016 10:22, Matthew Broadhead wrote: >> the server is using CentOS 7 and that is the package that

the server is using CentOS 7 and that is the package that comes through yum. everything is up to date. i am hesitant to install a new package manually as that could cause other compatibility issues? is there another way to test the configuration on the server? On 21/10/2016 01:07, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Op 10/20/2016 om 7:38 PM schreef Matthew Broadhead: >> do i need to provide

/var/log/maillog showed this Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 postfix/smtpd[1298]: 7599A2C19C6: client=unknown[127.0.0.1] Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 postfix/cleanup[1085]: 7599A2C19C6: message-id=<edc55a9b-eb49-3945-dc60-0e1d51a78e97 at nbmlaw.co.uk> Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 postfix/qmgr[1059]: 7599A2C19C6: from=<matthew.broadhead at nbmlaw.co.uk>, size=3190, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1

Op 10/20/2016 om 7:38 PM schreef Matthew Broadhead: > do i need to provide more information? > It still doesn't make sense to me. I do notice that the version you're using is ancient (dated 26-09-2013), which may well the problem. Do have the ability to upgrade? Regards, Stephan. > On 19/10/2016 14:49, Matthew Broadhead wrote: >> /var/log/maillog showed this >>

are there any instructions or tests i can make to check the sieve configuration? or does the magic all happen internally and there are no settings to change? On 21/10/2016 10:22, Matthew Broadhead wrote: > the server is using CentOS 7 and that is the package that comes > through yum. everything is up to date. i am hesitant to install a > new package manually as that could cause

it seemed like a simple configuration issue. i was hoping someone could point me in the right direction. seems i was wrong. i may as well unsubscribe this list as there is not much help here On 02/11/2016 18:29, Matthew Broadhead wrote: > is there something more i need to be doing my end? > > On 25/10/2016 09:11, Matthew Broadhead wrote: >> are there any instructions or tests

Hi, it seams I have a problem with the vacation script. The problem is that the vacation answers to a address that is not listed in the sieve script. I checked the postfix master.conf which delivers to lda correct parameter. In the logfile you can see that that office at example.com received a message that get delivered to user at example.com (with the sievescipt) and to office at

On 2018-03-03 21:28, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Op 3/2/2018 om 3:35 PM schreef Karol Augustin: >> Hi, >> >> I am using Dovecot LDA as LMTP renders envelope extension unusable. >> >> The problem I have noticed is that when user has multiple aliases sieve >> responds to all of them, not only to :addresses specified. >> >> From testing it seems that

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, dovecot version 1.2.12 on freebsd 7.0 with dovecot-sieve-1.2+0.1.17 I have users in ldap and aliases in /etc/aliases and i use postfix. There is an alias testuser at hostname for tuser at hostname. When tuser uses sieve vacation and uses the :addresses options with his email address (tuser at hostname), the response is also sent, if a mail to

i am using dovecot-2.2.36-3.el7_7.1.x86_64 on centos 7 is it possible to activate / deactivate a sieve script for a mailbox from the command line? my mailboxes are currently stores in /../vmail/domain.tld/username if i activate / deactivate a filter set using roundcube (webmail system) then it creates or deletes a symbolic link /../vmail/domain.tld/username/dovecot.sieve? which points to a

Dear Listmember. I resend this with different Subject so that the spamfilter does not drop the mail, I hope ;-) I try to migrate from my current courier-mta setup fo postfix dovecot setup. I use the following scirpt to filter to the destination mailbox. ### /var/vmail/none.at/al/.dovecot.sieve # from http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Sieve require ["fileinto", "envelope",

Hi, I am using Dovecot LDA as LMTP renders envelope extension unusable. The problem I have noticed is that when user has multiple aliases sieve responds to all of them, not only to :addresses specified. >From testing it seems that :addresses only adds addresses to the list of "known" emails to check against. It is not limiting it. As I understand, sieve should check if To: header

Some lists and emails are distributed via ns1.samba.org. For those of you that use ORBS, you'll find it is blacklisted now. There is no mention of it on the website and it doesn't return a positive when you enter it for testing but it has slipped into the ORBS blacklist somewhere. Samba.org admins may wish to force all ns1 outbound email via another netblock, bringing it up to ORBS only

i am using CentOS 7 centos-release-7-3.1611.el7.centos.x86_64 with dovecot dovecot-2.2.10-7.el7.x86_64. i am trying to set up AntiSpam with IMAPSieve but the package seems to be lacking sieve_imapsieve. is there anything i can do? i am not really interested in compiling from source because i like to receive security updates automatically. 2017-02-24 21:57:00auth: Error:

Thanks Michael. I have forwarded that link to the Geronimo JavaMail team in case they think of anything their end. But in the documentation you sent it seems that Dovecot should respond in the case of LIST / "*" if my understanding is correct Is there any way to adjust this behaviour in the settings? I am struggling to search for a solution to the problem given the limited

Dear all, I have a working setup with Postfix + Dovecot, storing users in a MySQL table. I ran into problems setting up and using a mail address like a"@"b at mydomain.tld, which by RFC should be valid, but leads to problems in Dovecot. From my debugging, I can see that on the lookup, Dovecot replaces %n with "a" (quotes added by me) and %d with "b at mydomain.tld"