similar to: Questions about hardlinks, alternate storage and compression

On 14/07/15 08:17, Steffen Kaiser wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, 13 Jul 2015, Gionatan Danti wrote: > >> On the other hand, private (per-user) sieve file works without >> interfering with hardlinks. In a similar manner, disabling sieve also >> permits dovecot to create multiple hardlinks for a single message. >> >>

Hi all, I have some questions about hardlinks, alternate storage and compression. I already scanned the list for related information and I have an idea of how things works, but I would like to have a definite answer. System spec: - CentOS 6.6 x64 - dovecot-2.0.9-8.el6_6.4.x86_64 RPM package/version - sdbox mail store 1) About hardlinks: when sending the same message to two different

> centos 7.x is latest, so if you need help upgrade make a bug report to > centos, not waste your time here since you choiced a precompiled > problem, reporting here 7s helpfull if you use dovecot compiled with > the latest version here, this migth be a unknown bug you then have > found, but not if you use precompiled problems, then report to the > maintainers of such software

On 30 Nov 2015, at 17:48, Gionatan Danti <g.danti at assyoma.it> wrote: > > Hi Timo, > glad to know it is in your TODO list ;) It's been for many years. > Any rough ETA on that? Right now it doesn't seem likely to be developed anytime soon. > Thanks. > > On 30/11/2015 14:23, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> On 30 Nov 2015, at 10:21, Gionatan Danti <g.danti

On 30 Nov 2015, at 10:21, Gionatan Danti <g.danti at assyoma.it> wrote: > > So, let me do a straigth question: is someone using dovecot/LMTP with hardlinking? To me, this seems a _very_ important feature, and I wonder if I am doing something wrong or if the feature (hardlink+sieve) simply does not exists. Hardlink+Sieve has never worked. The fix is a bit complicated. Here's my

Il 23-12-2019 12:04 Gionatan Danti ha scritto: > On 19/12/19 11:08, Gionatan Danti wrote: >> Hi list, >> many moons ago I asked about preserving hardlink between identical >> messages when pigeonhole (for sieve filtering) was used. >> >> The reply was that, while hardlink worked well for non-filtered >> messages, using pigeonhole broke the hardlink (ie:

Hi list, many moons ago I asked about preserving hardlink between identical messages when pigeonhole (for sieve filtering) was used. The reply was that, while hardlink worked well for non-filtered messages, using pigeonhole broke the hardlink (ie: some message-specific data was appended to the actual mail file). Here you can find the original thread:

On 14/07/15 12:26, Steffen Kaiser wrote: > > You asked about "newer dovecot versions", v2.2 does so. > Fair enough :) So, with v2.2+ the hardlink approach is irremediably gone, at least with LMTP (and without relying to SiS)? -- Danti Gionatan Supporto Tecnico Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it email: g.danti at assyoma.it - info at assyoma.it GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8

Il 26-11-2015 15:15 John R. Dennison ha scritto: > You are strongly encouraged to update that CentOS system. Current is > 6.7 (released some 3 months ago) and dovecot-2.0.9-19. Ouch! I copied outdated information from my old post. My current system _is_ CentOS 6.7 with dovecot dovecot-2.0.9-19.el6_7.2.x86_64 Sorry for the confusion. Still, the problems remain > If you find you need a

Il 2020-11-01 13:23 John Stoffel ha scritto: > How is your "mail_location" defined in your configuration? And what > is your search term? > > John Hi, I just discovered having such strange .temp files on an old server of mine. In some folders I have hundred of such files, but they really are hardlinks to the same .temp file (for each folder), so they do not consume

> On 01/11/2020 21:13 John Stoffel <john at stoffel.org> wrote: > > > >>>>> "Gionatan" == Gionatan Danti <g.danti at assyoma.it> writes: > > Gionatan> Il 2020-11-01 13:23 John Stoffel ha scritto: > >> How is your "mail_location" defined in your configuration? And what > >> is your search term? > >

Sorry for the bump... Anyone know if it is possible to have multiple protocols instances with different ssl_protocols settings? Regards. On 07/02/15 00:03, Gionatan Danti wrote: > Hi all, > anyone with some ideas? > > Thanks. > > Il 2015-02-02 23:08 Gionatan Danti ha scritto: >> Hi all, >> I have a question regarding the "ssl_protocols" parameter.

Hi list, we all know why ZFS is not included in RHEL/CentOS distributions: its CDDL license is/seems not compatible with GPL license. I'm not a layer, and I do not have any strong opinion on the matter. However, as a sysadmin, I found ZFS to be extremely useful, especially considering BTRFS sad state. I would *really* love to have ZFS on Linux more intergrated with current CentOS. From

Il 01-06-2017 19:42 Jeremy Allison ha scritto: > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 03:11:53PM +0200, Gionatan Danti wrote: >> However, *no* user authentication is possible on samba shares when >> the VPN tunnel is down? >> >> Do you have any suggestions? > > I think Uri and Volker did the work on this. Uri, can you > give an update on where we stand with offline auth

Il 26-08-2017 01:13 WK ha scritto: > Big +1 on what was Kevin just said.? Just avoiding the problem is the > best strategy. Ok, never run Gluster with anything less than a replica2 + arbiter ;) > However, for the record,? and if you really, really want to get deep > into the weeds on the subject, then the? Gluster people have docs on > Split-Brain recovery. > >

Il 23-08-2017 18:14 Pavel Szalbot ha scritto: > Hi, after many VM crashes during upgrades of Gluster, losing network > connectivity on one node etc. I would advise running replica 2 with > arbiter. Hi Pavel, this is bad news :( So, in your case at least, Gluster was not stable? Something as simple as an update would let it crash? > I once even managed to break this setup (with

Il 01-06-2017 14:45 Data Control Systems - Mike Elkevizth ha scritto: > I've had issues with cached credentials with the Ubuntu packages that > are currently at version 4.3.11. They are a little old, but I haven't > seen any change logs for the newer versions specifically regarding > this issue. Maybe I've missed it, but it's the main reason I continue > using

Hi all, I have a question regarding the "ssl_protocols" parameter. I understand that editing the 10-ssl.conf file I can set the ssl_protocols variable as required. At the same time, I can edit a single protocol file (eg: 20-pop3.conf) to set the ssl_protocols for a specific protocol/listener. I wander if (and how) I can create a different listener for another POP3 instance, for

Ciao Gionatan, I run Gluster 3.10.x (Replica 3 arbiter or 2 + 1 arbiter) to provide storage for oVirt 4.x and I have had no major issues so far. I have done online upgrades a couple of times, power losses, maintenance, etc with no issues. Overall, it is very resilient. Important thing to keep in mind is your network, I run the Gluster nodes on a redundant network using bonding mode 1 and I have

Hi all, as per subject, when a Windows guest using a Spice display is rebooted with a planned chkdsk, the consistency check is always skipped. It seems that the Spice display issues some "phantom" keystrokes, which are then intended by Windows as the "skip chkdsk at boot" signal. I tried to use a Spice display with no additional features (ie: USB redirection), but to no