similar to: Sieve reject with ORIG-TO vs TO

On Jan 13, 2015, at 7:34 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > and what would that change? > nothing if you think about how mail works! > > * the MTA receives the message > * the MTA confirms with 2xx status code > * later the delivery server rejects > * the MTA *must* create a bounce > > just don't reject mails after you confirmed you

Currently pigeonhole supports reject which would generate a NDR for each message. (If I understand the current documentation) Using Dovecot LMTP it would be more optimal to kick a 5xx back to the primary MTA to reject the delivery rather than generating more back scatter NDRs. Anyone know if this is possible now (to forgo the NDR)'s or do we need to wait for ereject ? If so, how much work

Hi all, I have succeed in setting up postfix (to send/receive emails), dovecot to access the folders via IMAP, all using TLS and sieve under dovecot to manage filters. I have also set up a sieve rule to reject those mails whose size exceeds 2 MB... and I'm really proud of everything, because it is my first time!! However, when rejecting the mail, instead of sending a mail saying

Hello everybody. I use the version of dovecot 2.3.0.1 and postfix 3.3.0 on my test computer. Postfix pass incoming messages to Dovecot via the LMTP protocol. I want to understand how to fine tune the "reject" action in sieve-scripts. The task: in my installation I use the translation of a set of aliases into the (hidden) target email address inside postfix (postfix directives:

Am 14.01.2015 um 01:28 schrieb Robert Blayzor: > Currently pigeonhole supports reject which would generate a NDR for each message. (If I understand the current documentation) > > Using Dovecot LMTP it would be more optimal to kick a 5xx back to the primary MTA to reject the delivery rather than generating more back scatter NDRs and what would that change? nothing if you think about how

Am 14.01.2015 um 02:23 schrieb Robert Blayzor: > On Jan 13, 2015, at 7:34 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: >> >> and what would that change? >> nothing if you think about how mail works! >> >> * the MTA receives the message >> * the MTA confirms with 2xx status code >> * later the delivery server rejects >> * the MTA

On Jan 13, 2015, at 8:30 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > so what you want in your OP is just DISCARD in a sieve script and there is no point in "Using Dovecot LMTP it would be more optimal to kick a 5xx back" when the desired result is DISCARD > > why do you want the burden of keep the SMTP session with the client open until the mail is

Hello Dovecot users, Relatively many bugs and problems were reported recently in a short period of time. Apparently, now that Dovecot v1.2 is finally stable, the new Sieve plugin is also starting to get used much more. No known bugs remain. Let's hope I didn't spawn any new ones. Apart from the bugfixes I made the deprecated notify plugin implementation compatible with CMUSieve. You

Hello Dovecot users, Relatively many bugs and problems were reported recently in a short period of time. Apparently, now that Dovecot v1.2 is finally stable, the new Sieve plugin is also starting to get used much more. No known bugs remain. Let's hope I didn't spawn any new ones. Apart from the bugfixes I made the deprecated notify plugin implementation compatible with CMUSieve. You

This looks quite nice at first glance.. http://encytemedia.com/event-selectors/ I would love to hear some of your comments pro or con on how this compares to Behavior. ______________________________________________________________________ Alex Duffield . Principal . InControl Solutions . http:// www.incontrolsolutions.com _______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs

Hi Dovecot users i like to know how i can make dovecot not bounce when i have a sieve rule that says reject :/ my postfix is configured as in wiki with the pipe to deliver lda in dovecot, how do i solve this ? problem comes from the part that sieve vacation need to bounce to get returned mail added to vacation response, but a sieve rule with reject, accept and bounce in my setup :( postfix

Regid, You suggested we remove nut_version.h from the .orig.tar.gz for NUT: <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613643> The original intent was that nut_version.h would be generated from "make dist" (or "make distcheck*") when the official nut-X.Y.Z.tar.gz tarball is created. At that point, it is safe to assume that there is no longer any local version

Hi list, We have a strange behavior: a customer Snom300 behind a public FW has contact like contact              : sip:user at x.y.39.147:2048;x-ast-orig-host=169.254.252.1:2048 The phone can place calls but not receive any. Also, qualify give unreachable which seems correct when looking the x-ast-orig-host IP. Problem is that the local IP of this phone is 192.168.1.75 Question: how

Must be able to pass Caller ID number. Email me with your terms.

Hi to all, i have a problem with LDA when users are quota-full. My setup is Vpopmail + dovecot + lda; if i send a messagge internally to a user with quota full i receive correctly a messagge but in the header ( i attacch a snip) From - Fri May 10 14:42:27 2013 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: <"<>"@mail.cgilfe.it> i receive

I'm using dovecot-1.2-sieve-0.1.15 with dovecot-1.2.11. I have a reject test filter that looks like this: require "reject"; if header :contains "subject" "reject" { reject "bye"; } Is there any way to get a "reject" filter to send back a 550 reject as detailed in http://ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/rfc5429/#section-2.5 rather than a MDN? The

Hey gang. Jed noticed an issue with the ''dependency''/''dependencies'' macro the other day when working on the Collective wiki. Namely, if you make RedCloth a dependency Merb gets a little cranky. I think I have this figured out when doing some mods to Collective today too. However, before I go trying to fix this in Merb, I wanted to run this by the community.

I case someone is interesed too, why it was not working: Am 14.01.19 um 20:22 schrieb Ralf Becker: > I have to reject office files for a certain domain plus notifying the > original recipient about the rejection too. > > require ["fileinto","reject","body","enotify","variables"]; > > if allof (address :contains

I have to reject office files for a certain domain plus notifying the original recipient about the rejection too. require ["fileinto","reject","body","enotify","variables"]; if allof (address :contains ["To","TO","Cc","CC"] "@example.org", body :content? "application/msword" :contains

Am 14.01.2015 um 02:40 schrieb Robert Blayzor: > On Jan 13, 2015, at 8:30 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: >> >> so what you want in your OP is just DISCARD in a sieve script and there is no point in "Using Dovecot LMTP it would be more optimal to kick a 5xx back" when the desired result is DISCARD >> >> why do you want the burden of