similar to: users of dbox format

Hello list. Following two previous unanswered requests (http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2014-August/097449.html and http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2014-May/096261.html), I fell into the same problem: ACL and lazy_expunge plugins do not work together. I had lazy_expunge enabled working OK. Then I activated ACL plugin, and gave dovecot.2 visibily over paolo.cravero's Inbox: the IMAP

Hi all! The set-up I have is a classic one: 1. one or more Dovecot relay/directors Postfix SMTP servers in DMZ 2. one or more backend IMAP/SMTP servers on the inside network 3. There may or may not be separate incoming or outgoing designated SMTP servers. Now the desired functionality is (of course): 1. relay machines receive messages from outside AND inside 2. relays check for all the bad

Andreas, > I am interested in finding out your experiences with using the dbox > format (especially mdbox) if you use this format. mdbox is THE reason why I am trying Dovecot. With mailboxes of several (tens of) GB with several k of messages I hope mdbox will speedup backups. Also SIS for attachments sounds very good, but still doesn't follow the altstorage rules (while messages go to

Hi, I am contemplating migrating from maildir to dbox. However, I wonder about the maturity of the dbox code, as it appears to not be widely used. Does anybody have some success stories? My primary driver is to have non-changing file names, and thus smaller backup deltas. Are there other advantages that I should pursue? I read in the wiki that the migration is straightforward, but I did not

From the command >doveadm log errors we get > Jan 31 15:41:12 imap(xxxx): Panic: Buffer full (8221 > 8192, pool > <none>) Jan 31 15:41:12 imap(xxxx): Error: Raw backtrace: > /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x5b83a) [0x7ffbaa3a783a] -> > /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x5b886) [0x7ffbaa3a7886] -> >

On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 16:08 +0200, Andreas Kasenides wrote: > I am usually emotionally (at least) against of open-source projects > loosing their independence to large corporations. Possibly due to bad OX-AG is a "large corporation"? Did I miss something? Kind regards, Bernd -- "I dislike type abstraction if it has no real reason. And saving on typing is not a good

On 26/03/15 13:05, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: > On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 16:08 +0200, Andreas Kasenides wrote: >> I am usually emotionally (at least) against of open-source projects >> loosing their independence to large corporations. Possibly due to bad > OX-AG is a "large corporation"? > Did I miss something? > > Kind regards, > Bernd I have no idea how large

I could not determine if when using filesystem quotas (http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Quota/FS) Dovecot will use the reported quota and limits without the need of configuring them via "quota_rules". Is this possible somehow? Such a feature would determine the quota limits automatically from the filesystem quotas thereby allowing to make use of them in quota warnings. Dovecot already knows

On Fri, 03 Apr 2015 08:42:42 -0400, Charles Marcus stated: >People, PLEASE do not engage Reindl on the list, it always results in >this kind of garbage that the adults on the list could do without. > >If you feel compelled to 'call him out', then by all means do so, but do >it PRIVATELY. It is not just Reindl. People like Nick who feel compelled to continue this persiflage

I find it extremely interesting that no one has commented on the merger of Dovecot Oy and Open-Xchange AG as announced by Timo on the 19th. Is this something that was known a long time ago and I missed? OK checked the on-line archive of the mailing list, no comments there - its not my email set-up - LOL. I am usually emotionally (at least) against of open-source projects loosing their

On 03/04/15 16:09, Jerry wrote: > On Fri, 03 Apr 2015 08:42:42 -0400, Charles Marcus stated: > >> People, PLEASE do not engage Reindl on the list, it always results in >> this kind of garbage that the adults on the list could do without. >> >> If you feel compelled to 'call him out', then by all means do so, but do >> it PRIVATELY. > It is not just

Hello Actually we use MBOX format for all our IMAP access but users complain they cannot create subfolders in imap folders, of course they cannot because of MBOX format ... I need gurus advices on changing mailbox format Maildir of Dbox ? What would be the safest way to go ? Note : we extensively use Thunderbird here. Thanks

I'm facing some issues on mdbox based backups. Backups are failing with dbox corruption messages. SiS is the greatest advantage though. However backups integrity is very important. If SiS/Deduplication is not a requirement stick to Maildir. Regards DP -----Original Message----- From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Gedalya Sent: 20 April 2018 08:19 To: dovecot at

Hello Dovecoters, I am using dovecot-2.2.10-8.el7.x86_64 on RHEL 7.4 When I backup mdboxes (using SIS) using this command doveadm -Dv -o plugin/quota= sync -1f -u user1 at user.com mdbox:/mailbackup/user1 mails get backedup but all m files are not copied. Last file copied is m.4 If I run the command again I get below error I tried with doveadm backup command as well (many times).

The mdbox-format with the altstorage-feature is quite nice and important. But we're having much more then >> 30 TB of maildata and doing an fsck on huge partitions takes too much (down-) time for our mailsystem. It would be much easier, if Dovecot would be able to use at least THREE storage-paths for his m-Files (and not just TWO like now). Having an altstorage1 and altstorage2, we

We will be deploying a replacement Dovecot server soon, and we are planning to use maildir for the primary storage, but with an archive namespace using mdbox (or perhaps sdbox), and SIS. Our backup servers and (luke)warm spare server need to obtain full copies of the mail store. For the maildirs I know I can simply use rsync (we already use it here). I'm a little wary of using rsync with

Hello, I've got a Dovecot virtual email setup using maildir as the mailbox format. I am wondering from others who have chosen dbox a comparison between maildir and dbox or those who have migrated from one format to another. I am wondering if changing to dbox would be beneficial? Thanks. Dave.

Just a note to myself and whoever else cares, should be added to wiki once it has its own page about this: With single-dbox messages can be copied with hard linking. This means that there can be multiple files that point to the same attachment file. The attachment is now deleted only once the mail file's link count drops to zero, so this works fine.. ..until someone goes and starts manually

Hi all, in my settup i decided to set mail_home in 10-mail.conf, and let dovecot do the hashing to a 2-level directory structure. mail_location = mdbox:~/mdbox:ALT=/altstorage/%h/mdbox mail_home = /vmail/%1Mu/%2.1Mu/%u In my userdb ist homedirectory not set and everythink works as expected, except when i use rawlog i get only logs in ~/dovecot.rawlog if home is set in userdb. In wiki

Hi I'm migrating some mailboxes from an old dovecot system where mailboxes are stored maildir uncompressed. I enabled zlib on the new system and migrated an account: doveadm -o mail_fsync=never backup -R -u tonyg imapc: when the account connects to the new system after a while i'm seeing the following error and the mailbox is no longer functioning: Jan 15 13:58:06 S611 dovecot: