Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "concurrent IMAP connections (plus 2 easy questions)"
2015 Feb 03
4
Hitting wall at 2048 IMAP connections
We are gradually rolling out Dovecot (IMAP only, no POP3) to our
customer base. We are replicating between a pair of CentOS 7 boxes.
All has been working wonderfully. However, to be sure our rollout
continues to go smoothly, we put together a simple benchmark client
program to fire up X persistent IMAP connections (using hundreds of
mailboxes) that login, list the folders, select the
2011 Feb 01
3
dovecot: imap-login: Error: net_connect_unix(imap) failed: Resource temporarily unavailable
We recently switched over mail servers to one running dovecot and postfix
on RedHat Enterprise 6. The mail store is NFS on a NetApp filer, the
index files are on local disk. We have about 6000 total active users,
though not all of them access the system at the same time.
All goes well for a while, then we start seeing errors like this in the
log:
dovecot: imap-login: Error:
2019 Mar 24
2
Maximum Listeners.
Hello there,
I’ve configured my server for maximum 50000 open files.
[root at scast1 ~]# ulimit -a
...
open files (-n) 50000
...
max user processes (-u) 65535
While im doing the Load Test 1, my server only reaches ~1015 listeners.
I’ve set this on etc/security/limits.conf :
icecast hard nofile 50000
icecast soft nofile 60000
icecast soft nproc 65535
icecast
2009 Jul 15
2
"limit -n XXX" does NOT allow on CENTOS 4.X???
We have CENTOS 4.7 on DELL server. our /etc/security/limits.conf already setup as:
* soft nproc 2047
* hard nproc 16384
* soft nofile 4096
* hard nofile 65536
oracle soft nproc 2047
oracle hard nproc 16384
oracle soft nofile 8192
2017 May 25
2
Re: can't establish more than 1000 connections with virsh
在 2017年05月25日 18:37, Daniel P. Berrange 写道:
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 06:20:51PM +0800, dw wrote:
>> Hi:
>>
>> I'm trying to connect with libvirtd with virsh from a remote PC,but only
>> can establish 1000 connections.
>>
>> If try more connections,prompt:
>>
>> "error: failed to connect to the hypervisor
>>
2015 Feb 03
0
Hitting wall at 2048 IMAP connections
On 02/03/2015 03:35 PM, Ron Cleven wrote:
> We are gradually rolling out Dovecot (IMAP only, no POP3) to our
> customer base. We are replicating between a pair of CentOS 7 boxes. All
> has been working wonderfully. However, to be sure our rollout continues
> to go smoothly, we put together a simple benchmark client program to
> fire up X persistent IMAP connections (using hundreds
2016 Oct 08
0
Too many open files
On 20 Sep 2016, at 3:10, Chen Wei Hsu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to stream for over 1k users on Ubuntu 16.04. I notice that
> when
> stream connection is over 1024, it get warning like this:
>
> WARN connection/_accept_connection accept() failed with error 24: Too
> many
> open files
>
> Tried these configs and reboot, it won't work!
>
2016 Oct 08
0
Too many open files
It all looks like a workarounds. I would suggest using a proper solution,
such as systemd, that is present in ubuntu 16.04 by default, and where you
can raise system limits per system service just by tweaking its config file.
m.
On 8 października 2016 at 11:37:59, Chen Wei Hsu (cwhsu1984 at gmail.com)
wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to stream for over 1k users on Ubuntu 16.04. I notice that when
2017 May 25
0
Re: can't establish more than 1000 connections with virsh
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 06:51:40PM +0800, dw wrote:
> 在 2017年05月25日 18:37, Daniel P. Berrange 写道:
> > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 06:20:51PM +0800, dw wrote:
> > > Hi:
> > >
> > > I'm trying to connect with libvirtd with virsh from a remote PC,but only
> > > can establish 1000 connections.
> > >
> > > If try more
2016 Sep 20
4
Too many open files
Hi all,
I am trying to stream for over 1k users on Ubuntu 16.04. I notice that when
stream connection is over 1024, it get warning like this:
WARN connection/_accept_connection accept() failed with error 24: Too many
open files
Tried these configs and reboot, it won't work!
/etc/pam.d/common-session
session required pam_limits.so
/etc/sysctl.conf
fs.file-max = 100000
2018 Feb 15
0
wbinfo -U id gives different users on same dc
Hi Louis,
Thanks for information, find it sometimes is a real challenge. Would you
please share your how to link? I wish to read it.
For the .local domain I suppose I have nothing to do. This is a running
windows Active Directory and it is not possible to change domain suffix.
Here is my /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
10.254.104.8 wdc04.aa.local wdc04
10.254.105.208
2017 Feb 02
0
Dovecot performance and proxy loops with IPv6
Hello list,
i run here an large mailsetup with some million mailboxes and got strange performance problems, cause i think i have overseen or forgotten an simple setting.
Here are some details:
21 CentOS 7 Servers with dovecot 2.2.25 and ldap userdb/passdb via socket behind an hardware loadbalancer.
The storage behind is an ISCSI Storage with 4 10Gbit/s multipath paths, splitted up to 10 TB
2007 Jan 27
0
Problem with MAX OPEN FILES REACHED
I am using CALDERA OPENLINUX 3.1.1 with latest patches and Samba 2.2.5 on it.
But recently I start to receive linux error "kernel: VFS MAX FILES REACHED"
and Samba error "Too many open files". After it I tuning linux increase open
files descriptors in
/etc/security/limits.conf
* soft nproc 4094
* hard nproc 16384
* soft
2014 Dec 16
2
replication - more than 2 servers?
We tested dovecot for a fair amount of time and decided finally to put
it into production under CentOS 7 (we are running 2.2.10). I just
joined the list, so I apologize for what is probably a question that has
been answered many times, but I was wondering if there are any plans to
implement replication among 3 or more servers (all "masters", as with
2)? As best as I can tell,
2018 Feb 15
3
wbinfo -U id gives different users on same dc
Sure there is,
Install debian, follow my howto and you will have success.
Just, your using an .local domain, and thats a reserved name for apples mDNS (zeroconf)
And should not be used. ( same for .lan )
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/FAQ#Can_I_Use_the_.local_Top-level_Domain_for_My_AD_DNS_Zone.3F
So the info is good, thats not the problem, finding it, is.
Can you post your /etc/hosts
2020 Mar 31
0
limit for user exceeded
Hi
I Dont understand or? I im thinking wrong:
process_limit = 25000
Older:
#fs.inotify.max_user_watches= 8192
#fs.inotify.max_user_instances = 16384
New:
fs.inotify.max_user_instances = 8192
?
fs.inotify.max_user_watches= process_limit x 2 + fs.inotify.max_user_instances
fs.inotify.max_user_watches= 58192
On 31.03.2020 13:44, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> I would prefer replies on the list... =)
2013 Mar 07
1
Inotify max_user_instances
Maybe I have multiple problems - dunno.
I've started seeing the following log lines:
Mar 7 07:46:22 bubba dovecot: imap(dmiller at amfes.com): Warning: Inotify
instance limit for user 5000 (UID vmail) exceeded, disabling. Increase
/proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_instances
max_user_instances is currently 128.
I've tried stopping and restarting dovecot - the message immediately
returns.
2024 Dec 08
1
TOO MANY OPEN FILES when adding printer driver
Dear Samba experts,
I have 10 rpcd_spoolss processes running. Here's the
output o prlimit for one of them:
# prlimit -p628
RESOURCE DESCRIPTION SOFT HARD UNITS
AS address space limit unlimited unlimited bytes
CORE max core file size 0 unlimited bytes
CPU CPU time unlimited
2009 May 27
2
Inotify instance limit for user exceeded, disabling?
I'm seeing this message in my /var/log/maillog:
May 26 12:35:00 agencymail dovecot: IMAP(info at example.com): Inotify
instance limit for user exceeded, disabling. Increase
/proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_instances
I rummaged through google, and found :
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot-cvs/2008-May/011132.html
which says I need to increase /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_instances
(no
2011 Nov 02
1
nproc parameter in efpFunctional
Hello all,
could anyone explain the exact meaning of parameter nproc? Why different
values of nproc give so different critical values, i.e.
meanL2BB$computeCritval(0.05,nproc=3)
[1] 0.9984853
meanL2BB$computeCritval(0.05,nproc=1)
[1] 0.4594827
The strucchange-package description gives "integer specifying for which
number of processes Brownian motions should be simulated" - do I need